Cargando…
Smoking and Risk of Erectile Dysfunction: Systematic Review of Observational Studies with Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: There are many recent observational studies on smoking and risk of erectile dysfunction (ED) and whether smoking increases the risk of ED is still inconclusive. The objective of this meta-analysis was to synthesize evidence from studies that evaluated the association between smoking and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3616119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23573257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060443 |
_version_ | 1782265106445369344 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Shiyi Yin, Xiaoxu Wang, Yunxia Zhou, Hongfeng Song, Fujian Lu, Zuxun |
author_facet | Cao, Shiyi Yin, Xiaoxu Wang, Yunxia Zhou, Hongfeng Song, Fujian Lu, Zuxun |
author_sort | Cao, Shiyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are many recent observational studies on smoking and risk of erectile dysfunction (ED) and whether smoking increases the risk of ED is still inconclusive. The objective of this meta-analysis was to synthesize evidence from studies that evaluated the association between smoking and the risk of ED. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus in January 2013 to identify cohort and case-control studies that evaluated the association between smoking and ED. Study quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to combine the results of included studies. RESULTS: Four prospective cohort studies and four case-control studies involving 28, 586 participants were included. Because of significant heterogeneity after including case-control studies in meta-analysis, the consistent results of prospective cohort studies were considered more accurate, Because of significant heterogeneity after including case-control studies in meta-analysis, the consistent results of prospective cohort studies were considered more accurate, Compared with non-smokers, the overall odd ratio of ED in prospective cohort studies was 1.51(95% CI: 1.34 to 1.71) for current smokers, and it was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.47) for former smokers. Evidence of publication bias was not found. CONCLUSION: Evidence from epidemiological studies suggests that smoking, especially current smoking, may significantly increase the risk of ED |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3616119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36161192013-04-09 Smoking and Risk of Erectile Dysfunction: Systematic Review of Observational Studies with Meta-Analysis Cao, Shiyi Yin, Xiaoxu Wang, Yunxia Zhou, Hongfeng Song, Fujian Lu, Zuxun PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: There are many recent observational studies on smoking and risk of erectile dysfunction (ED) and whether smoking increases the risk of ED is still inconclusive. The objective of this meta-analysis was to synthesize evidence from studies that evaluated the association between smoking and the risk of ED. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus in January 2013 to identify cohort and case-control studies that evaluated the association between smoking and ED. Study quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to combine the results of included studies. RESULTS: Four prospective cohort studies and four case-control studies involving 28, 586 participants were included. Because of significant heterogeneity after including case-control studies in meta-analysis, the consistent results of prospective cohort studies were considered more accurate, Because of significant heterogeneity after including case-control studies in meta-analysis, the consistent results of prospective cohort studies were considered more accurate, Compared with non-smokers, the overall odd ratio of ED in prospective cohort studies was 1.51(95% CI: 1.34 to 1.71) for current smokers, and it was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.47) for former smokers. Evidence of publication bias was not found. CONCLUSION: Evidence from epidemiological studies suggests that smoking, especially current smoking, may significantly increase the risk of ED Public Library of Science 2013-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3616119/ /pubmed/23573257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060443 Text en © 2013 Cao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cao, Shiyi Yin, Xiaoxu Wang, Yunxia Zhou, Hongfeng Song, Fujian Lu, Zuxun Smoking and Risk of Erectile Dysfunction: Systematic Review of Observational Studies with Meta-Analysis |
title | Smoking and Risk of Erectile Dysfunction: Systematic Review of Observational Studies with Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Smoking and Risk of Erectile Dysfunction: Systematic Review of Observational Studies with Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Smoking and Risk of Erectile Dysfunction: Systematic Review of Observational Studies with Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Smoking and Risk of Erectile Dysfunction: Systematic Review of Observational Studies with Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Smoking and Risk of Erectile Dysfunction: Systematic Review of Observational Studies with Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | smoking and risk of erectile dysfunction: systematic review of observational studies with meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3616119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23573257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caoshiyi smokingandriskoferectiledysfunctionsystematicreviewofobservationalstudieswithmetaanalysis AT yinxiaoxu smokingandriskoferectiledysfunctionsystematicreviewofobservationalstudieswithmetaanalysis AT wangyunxia smokingandriskoferectiledysfunctionsystematicreviewofobservationalstudieswithmetaanalysis AT zhouhongfeng smokingandriskoferectiledysfunctionsystematicreviewofobservationalstudieswithmetaanalysis AT songfujian smokingandriskoferectiledysfunctionsystematicreviewofobservationalstudieswithmetaanalysis AT luzuxun smokingandriskoferectiledysfunctionsystematicreviewofobservationalstudieswithmetaanalysis |