Cargando…
Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Quality indicators (QI) are used in many health care areas to measure, compare, and improve the quality of care. Ideas of quality differ between health care providers and patients, yet patients are not regularly involved in QI development nor does a methodological standard for patient in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3616132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23569365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S39803 |
_version_ | 1782265109557542912 |
---|---|
author | Kötter, Thomas Schaefer, Friederike Anna Scherer, Martin Blozik, Eva |
author_facet | Kötter, Thomas Schaefer, Friederike Anna Scherer, Martin Blozik, Eva |
author_sort | Kötter, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Quality indicators (QI) are used in many health care areas to measure, compare, and improve the quality of care. Ideas of quality differ between health care providers and patients, yet patients are not regularly involved in QI development nor does a methodological standard for patient involvement in QI development exist. In this study we systematically reviewed the medical journal articles and gray literature for published approaches for involving patients in QI development. METHODS: We searched medical literature databases (Medline, Excerpta Medica database, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), screened websites, and contacted experts in the field of QI development for publications on approaches to patient involvement in QI development. RESULTS: Eleven relevant journal articles and four web-published documents were included. Four major approaches to patient involvement were extracted from the literature: (1) focus group interviews, (2) self-administered questionnaires, (3) individual interviews, and (4) participation in panels during systematic consensus processes. Patients’ views were collected by involving patients, patient representatives, or family members. CONCLUSION: Although there is a large body of literature on QI, publications that describe approaches to patient involvement in QI development are scarce. In principle, indirect and direct methods of patient involvement can be distinguished, and it seems most promising to combine different approaches. However, the limited number of publications identified clearly shows that further research in this field is overdue and that the quality of reporting found in studies within this field needs to be improved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3616132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36161322013-04-08 Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review Kötter, Thomas Schaefer, Friederike Anna Scherer, Martin Blozik, Eva Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Quality indicators (QI) are used in many health care areas to measure, compare, and improve the quality of care. Ideas of quality differ between health care providers and patients, yet patients are not regularly involved in QI development nor does a methodological standard for patient involvement in QI development exist. In this study we systematically reviewed the medical journal articles and gray literature for published approaches for involving patients in QI development. METHODS: We searched medical literature databases (Medline, Excerpta Medica database, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), screened websites, and contacted experts in the field of QI development for publications on approaches to patient involvement in QI development. RESULTS: Eleven relevant journal articles and four web-published documents were included. Four major approaches to patient involvement were extracted from the literature: (1) focus group interviews, (2) self-administered questionnaires, (3) individual interviews, and (4) participation in panels during systematic consensus processes. Patients’ views were collected by involving patients, patient representatives, or family members. CONCLUSION: Although there is a large body of literature on QI, publications that describe approaches to patient involvement in QI development are scarce. In principle, indirect and direct methods of patient involvement can be distinguished, and it seems most promising to combine different approaches. However, the limited number of publications identified clearly shows that further research in this field is overdue and that the quality of reporting found in studies within this field needs to be improved. Dove Medical Press 2013-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3616132/ /pubmed/23569365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S39803 Text en © 2013 Kötter et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kötter, Thomas Schaefer, Friederike Anna Scherer, Martin Blozik, Eva Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review |
title | Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review |
title_full | Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review |
title_short | Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review |
title_sort | involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3616132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23569365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S39803 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kotterthomas involvingpatientsinqualityindicatordevelopmentasystematicreview AT schaeferfriederikeanna involvingpatientsinqualityindicatordevelopmentasystematicreview AT scherermartin involvingpatientsinqualityindicatordevelopmentasystematicreview AT blozikeva involvingpatientsinqualityindicatordevelopmentasystematicreview |