Cargando…

Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Quality indicators (QI) are used in many health care areas to measure, compare, and improve the quality of care. Ideas of quality differ between health care providers and patients, yet patients are not regularly involved in QI development nor does a methodological standard for patient in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kötter, Thomas, Schaefer, Friederike Anna, Scherer, Martin, Blozik, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3616132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23569365
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S39803
_version_ 1782265109557542912
author Kötter, Thomas
Schaefer, Friederike Anna
Scherer, Martin
Blozik, Eva
author_facet Kötter, Thomas
Schaefer, Friederike Anna
Scherer, Martin
Blozik, Eva
author_sort Kötter, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality indicators (QI) are used in many health care areas to measure, compare, and improve the quality of care. Ideas of quality differ between health care providers and patients, yet patients are not regularly involved in QI development nor does a methodological standard for patient involvement in QI development exist. In this study we systematically reviewed the medical journal articles and gray literature for published approaches for involving patients in QI development. METHODS: We searched medical literature databases (Medline, Excerpta Medica database, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), screened websites, and contacted experts in the field of QI development for publications on approaches to patient involvement in QI development. RESULTS: Eleven relevant journal articles and four web-published documents were included. Four major approaches to patient involvement were extracted from the literature: (1) focus group interviews, (2) self-administered questionnaires, (3) individual interviews, and (4) participation in panels during systematic consensus processes. Patients’ views were collected by involving patients, patient representatives, or family members. CONCLUSION: Although there is a large body of literature on QI, publications that describe approaches to patient involvement in QI development are scarce. In principle, indirect and direct methods of patient involvement can be distinguished, and it seems most promising to combine different approaches. However, the limited number of publications identified clearly shows that further research in this field is overdue and that the quality of reporting found in studies within this field needs to be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3616132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36161322013-04-08 Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review Kötter, Thomas Schaefer, Friederike Anna Scherer, Martin Blozik, Eva Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Quality indicators (QI) are used in many health care areas to measure, compare, and improve the quality of care. Ideas of quality differ between health care providers and patients, yet patients are not regularly involved in QI development nor does a methodological standard for patient involvement in QI development exist. In this study we systematically reviewed the medical journal articles and gray literature for published approaches for involving patients in QI development. METHODS: We searched medical literature databases (Medline, Excerpta Medica database, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), screened websites, and contacted experts in the field of QI development for publications on approaches to patient involvement in QI development. RESULTS: Eleven relevant journal articles and four web-published documents were included. Four major approaches to patient involvement were extracted from the literature: (1) focus group interviews, (2) self-administered questionnaires, (3) individual interviews, and (4) participation in panels during systematic consensus processes. Patients’ views were collected by involving patients, patient representatives, or family members. CONCLUSION: Although there is a large body of literature on QI, publications that describe approaches to patient involvement in QI development are scarce. In principle, indirect and direct methods of patient involvement can be distinguished, and it seems most promising to combine different approaches. However, the limited number of publications identified clearly shows that further research in this field is overdue and that the quality of reporting found in studies within this field needs to be improved. Dove Medical Press 2013-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3616132/ /pubmed/23569365 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S39803 Text en © 2013 Kötter et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kötter, Thomas
Schaefer, Friederike Anna
Scherer, Martin
Blozik, Eva
Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review
title Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review
title_full Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review
title_fullStr Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review
title_short Involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review
title_sort involving patients in quality indicator development – a systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3616132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23569365
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S39803
work_keys_str_mv AT kotterthomas involvingpatientsinqualityindicatordevelopmentasystematicreview
AT schaeferfriederikeanna involvingpatientsinqualityindicatordevelopmentasystematicreview
AT scherermartin involvingpatientsinqualityindicatordevelopmentasystematicreview
AT blozikeva involvingpatientsinqualityindicatordevelopmentasystematicreview