Cargando…

Magnitude of discordance between registry data and death certificate when evaluating leading causes of death in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Discordance between dialysis registry and death certificate reported death has been demonstrated. Since cause of death is measured using registry data in dialysis patients and death certificate data in the general population, comparisons of cause of death proportions between dialysis pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lafrance, Jean-Philippe, Rahme, Elham, Iqbal, Sameena, Leblanc, Martine, Pichette, Vincent, Elftouh, Naoual, Vallée, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23530603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-51
_version_ 1782265210408534016
author Lafrance, Jean-Philippe
Rahme, Elham
Iqbal, Sameena
Leblanc, Martine
Pichette, Vincent
Elftouh, Naoual
Vallée, Michel
author_facet Lafrance, Jean-Philippe
Rahme, Elham
Iqbal, Sameena
Leblanc, Martine
Pichette, Vincent
Elftouh, Naoual
Vallée, Michel
author_sort Lafrance, Jean-Philippe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Discordance between dialysis registry and death certificate reported death has been demonstrated. Since cause of death is measured using registry data in dialysis patients and death certificate data in the general population, comparisons of cause of death proportions between dialysis patients and the general population may be biased. Our aim was to compare the proportion of deaths attributed to cardiovascular disease (CVD), malignancy, and infections between patients receiving dialysis and the general population using death certificates for both, and to quantify the magnitude of discrepancy between registry and death certificate estimates in dialysis patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 5858 patients initiating maintenance dialysis between 2001 and 2007 was conducted. Cause of death was obtained from both registry and death certificate data for dialysis patients, and from death certificate data for the general population. RESULTS: Compared to the general population, use of death certificate data in dialysis patients resulted in smaller differences in the proportion of deaths attributed to CVD or infection than that from the registry. In the general population, the proportion of deaths due to CVD is 29.3% for men and 28.2% for women, and the proportion of deaths due to infection is 3.3% for men and 3.6% for women. For men, the proportion of deaths in dialysis patients due to CVD using registry data is 41.5%, compared with a proportion of 32.1% using death certificate data. Similarly for women, the proportion of deaths due to CVD using registry data is 35.2% and that using death certificate data 24.3%. The proportion of deaths due to infection in dialysis patients follows the same pattern: for men, the proportion of deaths due to infection using registry data is 9.9% and that from death certificate data at 5.0%; while for women the proportions are 11.6% and 4.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While absolute cause-specific mortality rates did differ, evaluation of causes of death using death certificate in dialysis patients in Quebec revealed that they do not have substantially different proportion of death due to CVD or infections than the general population. Infections appeared to be a frequent complication leading to death, suggesting that infections are an important target to consider for reducing mortality in dialysis populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3617030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36170302013-04-05 Magnitude of discordance between registry data and death certificate when evaluating leading causes of death in dialysis patients Lafrance, Jean-Philippe Rahme, Elham Iqbal, Sameena Leblanc, Martine Pichette, Vincent Elftouh, Naoual Vallée, Michel BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Discordance between dialysis registry and death certificate reported death has been demonstrated. Since cause of death is measured using registry data in dialysis patients and death certificate data in the general population, comparisons of cause of death proportions between dialysis patients and the general population may be biased. Our aim was to compare the proportion of deaths attributed to cardiovascular disease (CVD), malignancy, and infections between patients receiving dialysis and the general population using death certificates for both, and to quantify the magnitude of discrepancy between registry and death certificate estimates in dialysis patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 5858 patients initiating maintenance dialysis between 2001 and 2007 was conducted. Cause of death was obtained from both registry and death certificate data for dialysis patients, and from death certificate data for the general population. RESULTS: Compared to the general population, use of death certificate data in dialysis patients resulted in smaller differences in the proportion of deaths attributed to CVD or infection than that from the registry. In the general population, the proportion of deaths due to CVD is 29.3% for men and 28.2% for women, and the proportion of deaths due to infection is 3.3% for men and 3.6% for women. For men, the proportion of deaths in dialysis patients due to CVD using registry data is 41.5%, compared with a proportion of 32.1% using death certificate data. Similarly for women, the proportion of deaths due to CVD using registry data is 35.2% and that using death certificate data 24.3%. The proportion of deaths due to infection in dialysis patients follows the same pattern: for men, the proportion of deaths due to infection using registry data is 9.9% and that from death certificate data at 5.0%; while for women the proportions are 11.6% and 4.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While absolute cause-specific mortality rates did differ, evaluation of causes of death using death certificate in dialysis patients in Quebec revealed that they do not have substantially different proportion of death due to CVD or infections than the general population. Infections appeared to be a frequent complication leading to death, suggesting that infections are an important target to consider for reducing mortality in dialysis populations. BioMed Central 2013-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3617030/ /pubmed/23530603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-51 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lafrance et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lafrance, Jean-Philippe
Rahme, Elham
Iqbal, Sameena
Leblanc, Martine
Pichette, Vincent
Elftouh, Naoual
Vallée, Michel
Magnitude of discordance between registry data and death certificate when evaluating leading causes of death in dialysis patients
title Magnitude of discordance between registry data and death certificate when evaluating leading causes of death in dialysis patients
title_full Magnitude of discordance between registry data and death certificate when evaluating leading causes of death in dialysis patients
title_fullStr Magnitude of discordance between registry data and death certificate when evaluating leading causes of death in dialysis patients
title_full_unstemmed Magnitude of discordance between registry data and death certificate when evaluating leading causes of death in dialysis patients
title_short Magnitude of discordance between registry data and death certificate when evaluating leading causes of death in dialysis patients
title_sort magnitude of discordance between registry data and death certificate when evaluating leading causes of death in dialysis patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23530603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-51
work_keys_str_mv AT lafrancejeanphilippe magnitudeofdiscordancebetweenregistrydataanddeathcertificatewhenevaluatingleadingcausesofdeathindialysispatients
AT rahmeelham magnitudeofdiscordancebetweenregistrydataanddeathcertificatewhenevaluatingleadingcausesofdeathindialysispatients
AT iqbalsameena magnitudeofdiscordancebetweenregistrydataanddeathcertificatewhenevaluatingleadingcausesofdeathindialysispatients
AT leblancmartine magnitudeofdiscordancebetweenregistrydataanddeathcertificatewhenevaluatingleadingcausesofdeathindialysispatients
AT pichettevincent magnitudeofdiscordancebetweenregistrydataanddeathcertificatewhenevaluatingleadingcausesofdeathindialysispatients
AT elftouhnaoual magnitudeofdiscordancebetweenregistrydataanddeathcertificatewhenevaluatingleadingcausesofdeathindialysispatients
AT valleemichel magnitudeofdiscordancebetweenregistrydataanddeathcertificatewhenevaluatingleadingcausesofdeathindialysispatients