Cargando…
Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment
Is it permissible to harm one to save many? Classic moral dilemmas are often defined by the conflict between a putatively rational response to maximize aggregate welfare (i.e., the utilitarian judgment) and an emotional aversion to harm (i.e., the non-utilitarian judgment). Here, we address two ques...
Autores principales: | Gleichgerrcht, Ezequiel, Young, Liane |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23593213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060418 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reduced empathic concern leads to utilitarian moral judgments in trait alexithymia
por: Patil, Indrajeet, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good
por: Kahane, Guy, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Serotonin Transporter Genotype (5-HTTLPR) Predicts Utilitarian Moral Judgments
por: Marsh, Abigail A., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Fickle Judgments in Moral Dilemmas: Time Pressure and Utilitarian Judgments in an Interdependent Culture
por: Hashimoto, Hirofumi, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Utilitarian Moral Judgment Exclusively Coheres with Inference from Is to Ought
por: Elqayam, Shira, et al.
Publicado: (2017)