Cargando…
Trawling bats exploit an echo-acoustic ground effect
A water surface acts not only as an optic mirror but also as an acoustic mirror. Echolocation calls emitted by bats at low heights above water are reflected away from the bat, and hence the background clutter is reduced. Moreover, targets on the surface create an enhanced echo. Here, we formally qua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23576990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00065 |
_version_ | 1782265259199823872 |
---|---|
author | Zsebok, Sandor Kroll, Ferdinand Heinrich, Melina Genzel, Daria Siemers, Björn M. Wiegrebe, Lutz |
author_facet | Zsebok, Sandor Kroll, Ferdinand Heinrich, Melina Genzel, Daria Siemers, Björn M. Wiegrebe, Lutz |
author_sort | Zsebok, Sandor |
collection | PubMed |
description | A water surface acts not only as an optic mirror but also as an acoustic mirror. Echolocation calls emitted by bats at low heights above water are reflected away from the bat, and hence the background clutter is reduced. Moreover, targets on the surface create an enhanced echo. Here, we formally quantified the effect of the surface and target height on both target detection and -discrimination in a combined laboratory and field approach with Myotis daubentonii. In a two-alternative, forced-choice paradigm, the bats had to detect a mealworm and discriminate it from an inedible dummy (20 mm PVC disc). Psychophysical performance was measured as a function of height above either smooth surfaces (water or PVC) or above a clutter surface (artificial grass). At low heights above the clutter surface (10, 20, or 35 cm), the bats' detection performance was worse than above a smooth surface. At a height of 50 cm, the surface structure had no influence on target detection. Above the clutter surface, also target discrimination was significantly impaired with decreasing target height. A detailed analysis of the bats' echolocation calls during target approach shows that above the clutter surface, the bats produce calls with significantly higher peak frequency. Flight-path reconstruction revealed that the bats attacked an target from below over water but from above over a clutter surface. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that trawling bats exploit an echo-acoustic ground effect, in terms of a spatio-temporal integration of direct reflections with indirect reflections from the water surface, to optimize prey detection and -discrimination not only for prey on the water but also for some range above. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3617400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36174002013-04-10 Trawling bats exploit an echo-acoustic ground effect Zsebok, Sandor Kroll, Ferdinand Heinrich, Melina Genzel, Daria Siemers, Björn M. Wiegrebe, Lutz Front Physiol Physiology A water surface acts not only as an optic mirror but also as an acoustic mirror. Echolocation calls emitted by bats at low heights above water are reflected away from the bat, and hence the background clutter is reduced. Moreover, targets on the surface create an enhanced echo. Here, we formally quantified the effect of the surface and target height on both target detection and -discrimination in a combined laboratory and field approach with Myotis daubentonii. In a two-alternative, forced-choice paradigm, the bats had to detect a mealworm and discriminate it from an inedible dummy (20 mm PVC disc). Psychophysical performance was measured as a function of height above either smooth surfaces (water or PVC) or above a clutter surface (artificial grass). At low heights above the clutter surface (10, 20, or 35 cm), the bats' detection performance was worse than above a smooth surface. At a height of 50 cm, the surface structure had no influence on target detection. Above the clutter surface, also target discrimination was significantly impaired with decreasing target height. A detailed analysis of the bats' echolocation calls during target approach shows that above the clutter surface, the bats produce calls with significantly higher peak frequency. Flight-path reconstruction revealed that the bats attacked an target from below over water but from above over a clutter surface. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that trawling bats exploit an echo-acoustic ground effect, in terms of a spatio-temporal integration of direct reflections with indirect reflections from the water surface, to optimize prey detection and -discrimination not only for prey on the water but also for some range above. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3617400/ /pubmed/23576990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00065 Text en Copyright © 2013 Zsebok, Kroll, Heinrich, Genzel, Siemers and Wiegrebe. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Zsebok, Sandor Kroll, Ferdinand Heinrich, Melina Genzel, Daria Siemers, Björn M. Wiegrebe, Lutz Trawling bats exploit an echo-acoustic ground effect |
title | Trawling bats exploit an echo-acoustic ground effect |
title_full | Trawling bats exploit an echo-acoustic ground effect |
title_fullStr | Trawling bats exploit an echo-acoustic ground effect |
title_full_unstemmed | Trawling bats exploit an echo-acoustic ground effect |
title_short | Trawling bats exploit an echo-acoustic ground effect |
title_sort | trawling bats exploit an echo-acoustic ground effect |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23576990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zseboksandor trawlingbatsexploitanechoacousticgroundeffect AT krollferdinand trawlingbatsexploitanechoacousticgroundeffect AT heinrichmelina trawlingbatsexploitanechoacousticgroundeffect AT genzeldaria trawlingbatsexploitanechoacousticgroundeffect AT siemersbjornm trawlingbatsexploitanechoacousticgroundeffect AT wiegrebelutz trawlingbatsexploitanechoacousticgroundeffect |