Cargando…
Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme
Languages and cultures, like organisms, are constantly evolving. Words, like genes, can come and go–spreading around or going extinct. Here I discuss the spread of one small subset of words that are meant to convey “comprehensiveness” in some way: the “omes” and other words derived from “genome” or...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-1-6 |
_version_ | 1782265263387836416 |
---|---|
author | Eisen, Jonathan A |
author_facet | Eisen, Jonathan A |
author_sort | Eisen, Jonathan A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Languages and cultures, like organisms, are constantly evolving. Words, like genes, can come and go–spreading around or going extinct. Here I discuss the spread of one small subset of words that are meant to convey “comprehensiveness” in some way: the “omes” and other words derived from “genome” or “genomics.” I focus on a bad aspect of this spread the use of what I refer to as “badomics” words. I discuss why these should be considered bad and how to distinguish badomics words from good ones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3617454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36174542013-04-11 Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme Eisen, Jonathan A Gigascience Commentary Languages and cultures, like organisms, are constantly evolving. Words, like genes, can come and go–spreading around or going extinct. Here I discuss the spread of one small subset of words that are meant to convey “comprehensiveness” in some way: the “omes” and other words derived from “genome” or “genomics.” I focus on a bad aspect of this spread the use of what I refer to as “badomics” words. I discuss why these should be considered bad and how to distinguish badomics words from good ones. BioMed Central 2012-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3617454/ /pubmed/23587201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-1-6 Text en Copyright © 2012 Eisen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Eisen, Jonathan A Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme |
title | Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme |
title_full | Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme |
title_fullStr | Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme |
title_full_unstemmed | Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme |
title_short | Badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme |
title_sort | badomics words and the power and peril of the ome-meme |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23587201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-1-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eisenjonathana badomicswordsandthepowerandperiloftheomememe |