Cargando…

Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution()

Some people have a concern for a fair distribution of incomes while others do not. Does such a concern matter for majority voting on redistribution? Fairness preferences are relevant for redistribution outcomes only if fair-minded voters are pivotal. Pivotality, in turn, depends on the structure of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Höchtl, Wolfgang, Sausgruber, Rupert, Tyran, Jean-Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IASP 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23564967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.004
_version_ 1782265285159419904
author Höchtl, Wolfgang
Sausgruber, Rupert
Tyran, Jean-Robert
author_facet Höchtl, Wolfgang
Sausgruber, Rupert
Tyran, Jean-Robert
author_sort Höchtl, Wolfgang
collection PubMed
description Some people have a concern for a fair distribution of incomes while others do not. Does such a concern matter for majority voting on redistribution? Fairness preferences are relevant for redistribution outcomes only if fair-minded voters are pivotal. Pivotality, in turn, depends on the structure of income classes. We experimentally study voting on redistribution between two income classes and show that the effect of inequality aversion is asymmetric. Inequality aversion is more likely to matter if the “rich” are in majority. With a “poor” majority, we find that redistribution outcomes look as if all voters were exclusively motivated by self-interest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3617627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher IASP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36176272013-04-05 Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution() Höchtl, Wolfgang Sausgruber, Rupert Tyran, Jean-Robert Eur Econ Rev Article Some people have a concern for a fair distribution of incomes while others do not. Does such a concern matter for majority voting on redistribution? Fairness preferences are relevant for redistribution outcomes only if fair-minded voters are pivotal. Pivotality, in turn, depends on the structure of income classes. We experimentally study voting on redistribution between two income classes and show that the effect of inequality aversion is asymmetric. Inequality aversion is more likely to matter if the “rich” are in majority. With a “poor” majority, we find that redistribution outcomes look as if all voters were exclusively motivated by self-interest. IASP 2012-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3617627/ /pubmed/23564967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.004 Text en © 2012 Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Höchtl, Wolfgang
Sausgruber, Rupert
Tyran, Jean-Robert
Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution()
title Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution()
title_full Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution()
title_fullStr Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution()
title_full_unstemmed Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution()
title_short Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution()
title_sort inequality aversion and voting on redistribution()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23564967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.004
work_keys_str_mv AT hochtlwolfgang inequalityaversionandvotingonredistribution
AT sausgruberrupert inequalityaversionandvotingonredistribution
AT tyranjeanrobert inequalityaversionandvotingonredistribution