Cargando…
Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution()
Some people have a concern for a fair distribution of incomes while others do not. Does such a concern matter for majority voting on redistribution? Fairness preferences are relevant for redistribution outcomes only if fair-minded voters are pivotal. Pivotality, in turn, depends on the structure of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IASP
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23564967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.004 |
_version_ | 1782265285159419904 |
---|---|
author | Höchtl, Wolfgang Sausgruber, Rupert Tyran, Jean-Robert |
author_facet | Höchtl, Wolfgang Sausgruber, Rupert Tyran, Jean-Robert |
author_sort | Höchtl, Wolfgang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Some people have a concern for a fair distribution of incomes while others do not. Does such a concern matter for majority voting on redistribution? Fairness preferences are relevant for redistribution outcomes only if fair-minded voters are pivotal. Pivotality, in turn, depends on the structure of income classes. We experimentally study voting on redistribution between two income classes and show that the effect of inequality aversion is asymmetric. Inequality aversion is more likely to matter if the “rich” are in majority. With a “poor” majority, we find that redistribution outcomes look as if all voters were exclusively motivated by self-interest. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3617627 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | IASP |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36176272013-04-05 Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution() Höchtl, Wolfgang Sausgruber, Rupert Tyran, Jean-Robert Eur Econ Rev Article Some people have a concern for a fair distribution of incomes while others do not. Does such a concern matter for majority voting on redistribution? Fairness preferences are relevant for redistribution outcomes only if fair-minded voters are pivotal. Pivotality, in turn, depends on the structure of income classes. We experimentally study voting on redistribution between two income classes and show that the effect of inequality aversion is asymmetric. Inequality aversion is more likely to matter if the “rich” are in majority. With a “poor” majority, we find that redistribution outcomes look as if all voters were exclusively motivated by self-interest. IASP 2012-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3617627/ /pubmed/23564967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.004 Text en © 2012 Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Article Höchtl, Wolfgang Sausgruber, Rupert Tyran, Jean-Robert Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution() |
title | Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution() |
title_full | Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution() |
title_fullStr | Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution() |
title_full_unstemmed | Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution() |
title_short | Inequality aversion and voting on redistribution() |
title_sort | inequality aversion and voting on redistribution() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23564967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hochtlwolfgang inequalityaversionandvotingonredistribution AT sausgruberrupert inequalityaversionandvotingonredistribution AT tyranjeanrobert inequalityaversionandvotingonredistribution |