Cargando…

Anticipatory Governance: Bioethical Expertise for Human/Animal Chimeras

The governance demands generated by the use of human/animal chimeras in scientific research offer both a challenge and an opportunity for the development of new forms of anticipatory governance through the novel application of bioethical expertise. Anticipatory governance can be seen to have three s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harvey, Alison, Salter, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23576848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2011.630069
_version_ 1782265312338509824
author Harvey, Alison
Salter, Brian
author_facet Harvey, Alison
Salter, Brian
author_sort Harvey, Alison
collection PubMed
description The governance demands generated by the use of human/animal chimeras in scientific research offer both a challenge and an opportunity for the development of new forms of anticipatory governance through the novel application of bioethical expertise. Anticipatory governance can be seen to have three stages of development whereby bioethical experts move from a reactive to a proactive stance at the edge of what is scientifically possible. In the process, the ethicists move upstream in their engagement with the science of human-to-animal chimeras. To what extent is the anticipatory coestablishment of the principles and operational rules of governance at this early stage in the development of the human-to-animal research field likely to result in a framework for bioethical decision making that is in support of science? The process of anticipatory governance is characterised by the entwining of the scientific and the philosophical so that judgements against science are also found to be philosophically unfounded, and conversely, those activities that are permissible are deemed so on both scientific and ethical grounds. Through what is presented as an organic process, the emerging bioethical framework for human-to-animal chimera research becomes a legitimating framework within which ‘good’ science can safely progress. Science gives bioethical expertise access to new governance territory; bioethical expertise gives science access to political acceptability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3617809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36178092013-04-08 Anticipatory Governance: Bioethical Expertise for Human/Animal Chimeras Harvey, Alison Salter, Brian Sci Cult (Lond) Research Article The governance demands generated by the use of human/animal chimeras in scientific research offer both a challenge and an opportunity for the development of new forms of anticipatory governance through the novel application of bioethical expertise. Anticipatory governance can be seen to have three stages of development whereby bioethical experts move from a reactive to a proactive stance at the edge of what is scientifically possible. In the process, the ethicists move upstream in their engagement with the science of human-to-animal chimeras. To what extent is the anticipatory coestablishment of the principles and operational rules of governance at this early stage in the development of the human-to-animal research field likely to result in a framework for bioethical decision making that is in support of science? The process of anticipatory governance is characterised by the entwining of the scientific and the philosophical so that judgements against science are also found to be philosophically unfounded, and conversely, those activities that are permissible are deemed so on both scientific and ethical grounds. Through what is presented as an organic process, the emerging bioethical framework for human-to-animal chimera research becomes a legitimating framework within which ‘good’ science can safely progress. Science gives bioethical expertise access to new governance territory; bioethical expertise gives science access to political acceptability. Taylor & Francis 2012-02-21 2012-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3617809/ /pubmed/23576848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2011.630069 Text en © 2012 Process Press http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harvey, Alison
Salter, Brian
Anticipatory Governance: Bioethical Expertise for Human/Animal Chimeras
title Anticipatory Governance: Bioethical Expertise for Human/Animal Chimeras
title_full Anticipatory Governance: Bioethical Expertise for Human/Animal Chimeras
title_fullStr Anticipatory Governance: Bioethical Expertise for Human/Animal Chimeras
title_full_unstemmed Anticipatory Governance: Bioethical Expertise for Human/Animal Chimeras
title_short Anticipatory Governance: Bioethical Expertise for Human/Animal Chimeras
title_sort anticipatory governance: bioethical expertise for human/animal chimeras
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3617809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23576848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2011.630069
work_keys_str_mv AT harveyalison anticipatorygovernancebioethicalexpertiseforhumananimalchimeras
AT salterbrian anticipatorygovernancebioethicalexpertiseforhumananimalchimeras