Cargando…

HP1γ expression is elevated in prostate cancer and is superior to Gleason score as a predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: Aberrant chromatin structure in cancer cells results from altered proteins involved in its packaging. Heterochromatin protein 1 gamma (HP1γ) is a non-histone heterochromatic protein that functions to maintain chromatin stability and is important in embryonic development. Given an interes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Slezak, Jon, Truong, Matthew, Huang, Wei, Jarrard, David
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2013
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3618256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23522301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-148

Ejemplares similares

Gleason Pattern 5 is a Possible Pathologic Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
por: Ikeda, Masaomi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?
por: Chung, Mun Su, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Reporting Gleason grade/score in synoptic reports of radical prostatectomies
por: Renshaw, Andrew A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Risk prediction models for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score
por: Hu, Xin-Hai, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The Impact of Pathologic Upgrading of Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on the Risk of the Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Park, Juhyun, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A 10-gene signature as a predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer and a Gleason score ≥7
por: Wu, Xiangkun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
por: Geybels, Milan S., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Gleason Score 7 and Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 After Radical Prostatectomy
por: Leng, Yi-Hsueh, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
por: Milonas, Daimantas, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Histopathological Ratios to Predict Gleason Score Agreement between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy
por: Fiorentino, Vincenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Wenzel, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Does Gleason score of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence and oncological outcomes? Protocol for systematic review
por: John, Athul, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Higher Prostate Weight Is Inversely Associated with Gleason Score Upgrading in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
por: Reis, Leonardo Oliveira, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in patients with Gleason score 7 after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study
por: Li, Jiakun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Predictive Factors and Oncologic Outcome of Downgrade to Pathologic Gleason Score 6–7 after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Biopsy Gleason Score 8–10
por: Chung, Doo Yong, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort
por: Zhang, Baoling, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prediction model of gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy based on a bayesian network
por: Wang, Guipeng, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The correlation between the gleason score of the biopsy and that of the prostatectomy patch
por: Bai, W., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Subtypes of minimal residual disease, association with Gleason score, risk and time to biochemical failure in pT2 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy
por: Murray, Nigel P, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Gene expression signature of Gleason score is associated with prostate cancer outcomes in a radical prostatectomy cohort
por: Jhun, Min A., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cribriform architecture in radical prostatectomies predicts oncological outcome in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Ability of Prostate Health Index (PHI) to Predict Gleason Score in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Discriminate Patients Between Gleason Score 6 and Gleason Score Higher Than 6—A Study on 320 Patients After Radical Prostatectomy
por: Dolejsova, Olga, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Body mass index is associated with higher Gleason score and biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy in Chinese men: a retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis
por: Bai, Pei-De, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
por: Yang, Rong, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: An Indian experience
por: Nayyar, Rishi, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Gleason score and tumor laterality in radical prostatectomy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: a comparative study
por: Pereira, Renan A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Association of Age With Risk of Adverse Pathological Findings at Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
por: Kim, Daniel W., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Biochemical Recurrence in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer in Korean Men: Significance of the Primary Gleason Grade
por: Ro, Yun Kwan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Prostate cancer upgrading or downgrading of biopsy Gleason scores at radical prostatectomy: prediction of “regression to the mean” using routine clinical features with correlating biochemical relapse rates
por: Altok, Muammer, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Perspectives on the upgradation of Gleason score after radical prostatectomy: Why our uropathologists need to remain abreast with current concepts
por: Gautam, Gagan
Publicado: (2010)

Increased fatty acid synthase expression in prostate biopsy cores predicts higher Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen
por: Hamada, Shinsuke, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Preoperative prostate health index predicts adverse pathology and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
por: Novak, Vojtech, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens
por: Kim, Hwanik, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Role of inflammatory factors in prediction of Gleason score and its upgrading in localized prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
por: Wang, Shuo, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy primary Gleason score to predict biochemical failure in patients with intermediate prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy
por: Peng, Chao, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The Association of Fatty Acid Levels and Gleason Grade among Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
por: Zhao, Zhiguo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Hypertriglyceridemia Is a Potential Preoperative Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Kang, Minyong, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
por: Taguchi, Satoru, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI PIRADS scoring system
por: Alqahtani, Saeed, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Does the Time From Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Affect Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Clinical T1c Prostate Cancer?
por: Eroglu, Muzaffer, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_s4m8q0gv2u3hg6uc3g4135e5n9