Cargando…

Use of a Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring Device in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Outpatient ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring is a routine part of the management of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Current systems are limited by patient convenience and practicality. METHODS: We compared the Zio® Patch, a single-use, noninvasive waterproof long-te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenberg, Michael A, Samuel, Michelle, Thosani, Amit, Zimetbaum, Peter J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3618372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23240827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.12053
_version_ 1782265411699474432
author Rosenberg, Michael A
Samuel, Michelle
Thosani, Amit
Zimetbaum, Peter J
author_facet Rosenberg, Michael A
Samuel, Michelle
Thosani, Amit
Zimetbaum, Peter J
author_sort Rosenberg, Michael A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Outpatient ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring is a routine part of the management of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Current systems are limited by patient convenience and practicality. METHODS: We compared the Zio® Patch, a single-use, noninvasive waterproof long-term continuous monitoring patch, with a 24-hour Holter monitor in 74 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF referred for Holter monitoring for detection of arrhythmias. RESULTS: The Zio® Patch was well tolerated, with a mean monitoring period of 10.8 ± 2.8 days (range 4–14 days). Over a 24-hour period, there was excellent agreement between the Zio® Patch and Holter for identifying AF events and estimating AF burden. Although there was no difference in AF burden estimated by the Zio® Patch and the Holter monitor, AF events were identified in 18 additional individuals, and the documented pattern of AF (persistent or paroxysmal) changed in 21 patients after Zio® Patch monitoring. Other clinically relevant cardiac events recorded on the Zio® Patch after the first 24 hours of monitoring, including symptomatic ventricular pauses, prompted referrals for pacemaker placement or changes in medications. As a result of the findings from the Zio® Patch, 28.4% of patients had a change in their clinical management. CONCLUSIONS: The Zio® Patch was well tolerated, and allowed significantly longer continuous monitoring than a Holter, resulting in an improvement in clinical accuracy, the detection of potentially malignant arrhythmias, and a meaningful change in clinical management. Further studies are necessary to examine the long-term impact of the use of the Zio® Patch in AF management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3618372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36183722013-04-08 Use of a Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring Device in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study Rosenberg, Michael A Samuel, Michelle Thosani, Amit Zimetbaum, Peter J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Devices BACKGROUND: Outpatient ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring is a routine part of the management of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Current systems are limited by patient convenience and practicality. METHODS: We compared the Zio® Patch, a single-use, noninvasive waterproof long-term continuous monitoring patch, with a 24-hour Holter monitor in 74 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF referred for Holter monitoring for detection of arrhythmias. RESULTS: The Zio® Patch was well tolerated, with a mean monitoring period of 10.8 ± 2.8 days (range 4–14 days). Over a 24-hour period, there was excellent agreement between the Zio® Patch and Holter for identifying AF events and estimating AF burden. Although there was no difference in AF burden estimated by the Zio® Patch and the Holter monitor, AF events were identified in 18 additional individuals, and the documented pattern of AF (persistent or paroxysmal) changed in 21 patients after Zio® Patch monitoring. Other clinically relevant cardiac events recorded on the Zio® Patch after the first 24 hours of monitoring, including symptomatic ventricular pauses, prompted referrals for pacemaker placement or changes in medications. As a result of the findings from the Zio® Patch, 28.4% of patients had a change in their clinical management. CONCLUSIONS: The Zio® Patch was well tolerated, and allowed significantly longer continuous monitoring than a Holter, resulting in an improvement in clinical accuracy, the detection of potentially malignant arrhythmias, and a meaningful change in clinical management. Further studies are necessary to examine the long-term impact of the use of the Zio® Patch in AF management. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-03 2012-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3618372/ /pubmed/23240827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.12053 Text en © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Devices
Rosenberg, Michael A
Samuel, Michelle
Thosani, Amit
Zimetbaum, Peter J
Use of a Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring Device in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study
title Use of a Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring Device in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study
title_full Use of a Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring Device in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Use of a Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring Device in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Use of a Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring Device in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study
title_short Use of a Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring Device in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study
title_sort use of a noninvasive continuous monitoring device in the management of atrial fibrillation: a pilot study
topic Devices
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3618372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23240827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.12053
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenbergmichaela useofanoninvasivecontinuousmonitoringdeviceinthemanagementofatrialfibrillationapilotstudy
AT samuelmichelle useofanoninvasivecontinuousmonitoringdeviceinthemanagementofatrialfibrillationapilotstudy
AT thosaniamit useofanoninvasivecontinuousmonitoringdeviceinthemanagementofatrialfibrillationapilotstudy
AT zimetbaumpeterj useofanoninvasivecontinuousmonitoringdeviceinthemanagementofatrialfibrillationapilotstudy