Cargando…
Setting Priorities for Regional Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean Sea
Spatial prioritization in conservation is required to direct limited resources to where actions are most urgently needed and most likely to produce effective conservation outcomes. In an effort to advance the protection of a highly threatened hotspot of marine biodiversity, the Mediterranean Sea, mu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3618442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23577060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059038 |
_version_ | 1782265421466959872 |
---|---|
author | Micheli, Fiorenza Levin, Noam Giakoumi, Sylvaine Katsanevakis, Stelios Abdulla, Ameer Coll, Marta Fraschetti, Simonetta Kark, Salit Koutsoubas, Drosos Mackelworth, Peter Maiorano, Luigi Possingham, Hugh P. |
author_facet | Micheli, Fiorenza Levin, Noam Giakoumi, Sylvaine Katsanevakis, Stelios Abdulla, Ameer Coll, Marta Fraschetti, Simonetta Kark, Salit Koutsoubas, Drosos Mackelworth, Peter Maiorano, Luigi Possingham, Hugh P. |
author_sort | Micheli, Fiorenza |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spatial prioritization in conservation is required to direct limited resources to where actions are most urgently needed and most likely to produce effective conservation outcomes. In an effort to advance the protection of a highly threatened hotspot of marine biodiversity, the Mediterranean Sea, multiple spatial conservation plans have been developed in recent years. Here, we review and integrate these different plans with the goal of identifying priority conservation areas that represent the current consensus among the different initiatives. A review of six existing and twelve proposed conservation initiatives highlights gaps in conservation and management planning, particularly within the southern and eastern regions of the Mediterranean and for offshore and deep sea habitats. The eighteen initiatives vary substantially in their extent (covering 0.1–58.5% of the Mediterranean Sea) and in the location of additional proposed conservation and management areas. Differences in the criteria, approaches and data used explain such variation. Despite the diversity among proposals, our analyses identified ten areas, encompassing 10% of the Mediterranean Sea, that are consistently identified among the existing proposals, with an additional 10% selected by at least five proposals. These areas represent top priorities for immediate conservation action. Despite the plethora of initiatives, major challenges face Mediterranean biodiversity and conservation. These include the need for spatial prioritization within a comprehensive framework for regional conservation planning, the acquisition of additional information from data-poor areas, species or habitats, and addressing the challenges of establishing transboundary governance and collaboration in socially, culturally and politically complex conditions. Collective prioritised action, not new conservation plans, is needed for the north, western, and high seas of the Mediterranean, while developing initial information-based plans for the south and eastern Mediterranean is an urgent requirement for true regional conservation planning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3618442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36184422013-04-10 Setting Priorities for Regional Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean Sea Micheli, Fiorenza Levin, Noam Giakoumi, Sylvaine Katsanevakis, Stelios Abdulla, Ameer Coll, Marta Fraschetti, Simonetta Kark, Salit Koutsoubas, Drosos Mackelworth, Peter Maiorano, Luigi Possingham, Hugh P. PLoS One Research Article Spatial prioritization in conservation is required to direct limited resources to where actions are most urgently needed and most likely to produce effective conservation outcomes. In an effort to advance the protection of a highly threatened hotspot of marine biodiversity, the Mediterranean Sea, multiple spatial conservation plans have been developed in recent years. Here, we review and integrate these different plans with the goal of identifying priority conservation areas that represent the current consensus among the different initiatives. A review of six existing and twelve proposed conservation initiatives highlights gaps in conservation and management planning, particularly within the southern and eastern regions of the Mediterranean and for offshore and deep sea habitats. The eighteen initiatives vary substantially in their extent (covering 0.1–58.5% of the Mediterranean Sea) and in the location of additional proposed conservation and management areas. Differences in the criteria, approaches and data used explain such variation. Despite the diversity among proposals, our analyses identified ten areas, encompassing 10% of the Mediterranean Sea, that are consistently identified among the existing proposals, with an additional 10% selected by at least five proposals. These areas represent top priorities for immediate conservation action. Despite the plethora of initiatives, major challenges face Mediterranean biodiversity and conservation. These include the need for spatial prioritization within a comprehensive framework for regional conservation planning, the acquisition of additional information from data-poor areas, species or habitats, and addressing the challenges of establishing transboundary governance and collaboration in socially, culturally and politically complex conditions. Collective prioritised action, not new conservation plans, is needed for the north, western, and high seas of the Mediterranean, while developing initial information-based plans for the south and eastern Mediterranean is an urgent requirement for true regional conservation planning. Public Library of Science 2013-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3618442/ /pubmed/23577060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059038 Text en © 2013 Micheli et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Micheli, Fiorenza Levin, Noam Giakoumi, Sylvaine Katsanevakis, Stelios Abdulla, Ameer Coll, Marta Fraschetti, Simonetta Kark, Salit Koutsoubas, Drosos Mackelworth, Peter Maiorano, Luigi Possingham, Hugh P. Setting Priorities for Regional Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean Sea |
title | Setting Priorities for Regional Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean Sea |
title_full | Setting Priorities for Regional Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean Sea |
title_fullStr | Setting Priorities for Regional Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean Sea |
title_full_unstemmed | Setting Priorities for Regional Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean Sea |
title_short | Setting Priorities for Regional Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean Sea |
title_sort | setting priorities for regional conservation planning in the mediterranean sea |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3618442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23577060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michelifiorenza settingprioritiesforregionalconservationplanninginthemediterraneansea AT levinnoam settingprioritiesforregionalconservationplanninginthemediterraneansea AT giakoumisylvaine settingprioritiesforregionalconservationplanninginthemediterraneansea AT katsanevakisstelios settingprioritiesforregionalconservationplanninginthemediterraneansea AT abdullaameer settingprioritiesforregionalconservationplanninginthemediterraneansea AT collmarta settingprioritiesforregionalconservationplanninginthemediterraneansea AT fraschettisimonetta settingprioritiesforregionalconservationplanninginthemediterraneansea AT karksalit settingprioritiesforregionalconservationplanninginthemediterraneansea AT koutsoubasdrosos settingprioritiesforregionalconservationplanninginthemediterraneansea AT mackelworthpeter settingprioritiesforregionalconservationplanninginthemediterraneansea AT maioranoluigi settingprioritiesforregionalconservationplanninginthemediterraneansea AT possinghamhughp settingprioritiesforregionalconservationplanninginthemediterraneansea |