Cargando…

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Clinical Trials of Radix Astragali and Its Prescriptions for Diabetic Retinopathy

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radix astragali and its prescriptions for diabetic retinopathy. Methods. A computer-based online and manual search was conducted for randomized controlled trials addressing radix astragali and its prescriptions for diabetic retinopathy. Results. 16 R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Lin, Zhang, Gai, Zhou, Yi, Lu, Xuejing, Zhang, Fuwen, Ye, Hejiang, Duan, Junguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3618930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23573153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/762783
_version_ 1782265447351058432
author Cheng, Lin
Zhang, Gai
Zhou, Yi
Lu, Xuejing
Zhang, Fuwen
Ye, Hejiang
Duan, Junguo
author_facet Cheng, Lin
Zhang, Gai
Zhou, Yi
Lu, Xuejing
Zhang, Fuwen
Ye, Hejiang
Duan, Junguo
author_sort Cheng, Lin
collection PubMed
description Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radix astragali and its prescriptions for diabetic retinopathy. Methods. A computer-based online and manual search was conducted for randomized controlled trials addressing radix astragali and its prescriptions for diabetic retinopathy. Results. 16 RCTs involving 977 subjects and 1586 eyes were identified. Meta-analysis indicated that the effect of radix astragali and its prescriptions in improving visual acuity and fundus manifestations, lowering FBG, TG, plasma viscosity, and RAI, was superior to that of control group (WMD or OR 0.20, 0.27, −0.26, −0.36, −0.93, −1.27; 95% CI [0.09, 0.30], [0.17, 0.40], [−0.51, 0.00], [−0.60, −0.12], [−1.67, −0.20], [−2.35, −0.19]; P < 0.05, resp.). In contrary, the efficacy of radix astragali and its prescriptions was not superior to those of control group in descending HbA1C and TC with WMD 0.45, −0.96 and 95% CI [−1.00, 1.90], [−2.19, 0.27], P > 0.05, respectively. GRADE software suggested that the studies were of low methodological quality. Conclusion. Radix astragali and its prescriptions were superior to other treatments for diabetic retinopathy in terms of improving visual acuity and fundus manifestations, reducing FBG, TG, RAI, and plasma viscosity. The evaluated studies were of low methodological quality, indicating that the previous findings should be read with care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3618930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36189302013-04-09 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Clinical Trials of Radix Astragali and Its Prescriptions for Diabetic Retinopathy Cheng, Lin Zhang, Gai Zhou, Yi Lu, Xuejing Zhang, Fuwen Ye, Hejiang Duan, Junguo Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Review Article Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radix astragali and its prescriptions for diabetic retinopathy. Methods. A computer-based online and manual search was conducted for randomized controlled trials addressing radix astragali and its prescriptions for diabetic retinopathy. Results. 16 RCTs involving 977 subjects and 1586 eyes were identified. Meta-analysis indicated that the effect of radix astragali and its prescriptions in improving visual acuity and fundus manifestations, lowering FBG, TG, plasma viscosity, and RAI, was superior to that of control group (WMD or OR 0.20, 0.27, −0.26, −0.36, −0.93, −1.27; 95% CI [0.09, 0.30], [0.17, 0.40], [−0.51, 0.00], [−0.60, −0.12], [−1.67, −0.20], [−2.35, −0.19]; P < 0.05, resp.). In contrary, the efficacy of radix astragali and its prescriptions was not superior to those of control group in descending HbA1C and TC with WMD 0.45, −0.96 and 95% CI [−1.00, 1.90], [−2.19, 0.27], P > 0.05, respectively. GRADE software suggested that the studies were of low methodological quality. Conclusion. Radix astragali and its prescriptions were superior to other treatments for diabetic retinopathy in terms of improving visual acuity and fundus manifestations, reducing FBG, TG, RAI, and plasma viscosity. The evaluated studies were of low methodological quality, indicating that the previous findings should be read with care. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3618930/ /pubmed/23573153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/762783 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lin Cheng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cheng, Lin
Zhang, Gai
Zhou, Yi
Lu, Xuejing
Zhang, Fuwen
Ye, Hejiang
Duan, Junguo
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Clinical Trials of Radix Astragali and Its Prescriptions for Diabetic Retinopathy
title Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Clinical Trials of Radix Astragali and Its Prescriptions for Diabetic Retinopathy
title_full Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Clinical Trials of Radix Astragali and Its Prescriptions for Diabetic Retinopathy
title_fullStr Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Clinical Trials of Radix Astragali and Its Prescriptions for Diabetic Retinopathy
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Clinical Trials of Radix Astragali and Its Prescriptions for Diabetic Retinopathy
title_short Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Clinical Trials of Radix Astragali and Its Prescriptions for Diabetic Retinopathy
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 randomized clinical trials of radix astragali and its prescriptions for diabetic retinopathy
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3618930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23573153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/762783
work_keys_str_mv AT chenglin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof16randomizedclinicaltrialsofradixastragalianditsprescriptionsfordiabeticretinopathy
AT zhanggai systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof16randomizedclinicaltrialsofradixastragalianditsprescriptionsfordiabeticretinopathy
AT zhouyi systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof16randomizedclinicaltrialsofradixastragalianditsprescriptionsfordiabeticretinopathy
AT luxuejing systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof16randomizedclinicaltrialsofradixastragalianditsprescriptionsfordiabeticretinopathy
AT zhangfuwen systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof16randomizedclinicaltrialsofradixastragalianditsprescriptionsfordiabeticretinopathy
AT yehejiang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof16randomizedclinicaltrialsofradixastragalianditsprescriptionsfordiabeticretinopathy
AT duanjunguo systematicreviewandmetaanalysisof16randomizedclinicaltrialsofradixastragalianditsprescriptionsfordiabeticretinopathy