Cargando…

Language Delay Is Not Predictable from Available Risk Factors

Aims. To investigate factors associated with language delay in a cohort of 30-month-old children and determine if identification of language delay requires active contact with families. Methods. Data were collected at a pilot universal 30-month health contact. Health visitors used a simple two-item...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Philip, McQuaige, Fiona, Thompson, Lucy, McConnachie, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3618945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23576912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/947018
_version_ 1782265450739007488
author Wilson, Philip
McQuaige, Fiona
Thompson, Lucy
McConnachie, Alex
author_facet Wilson, Philip
McQuaige, Fiona
Thompson, Lucy
McConnachie, Alex
author_sort Wilson, Philip
collection PubMed
description Aims. To investigate factors associated with language delay in a cohort of 30-month-old children and determine if identification of language delay requires active contact with families. Methods. Data were collected at a pilot universal 30-month health contact. Health visitors used a simple two-item language screen. Data were obtained for 315 children; language delay was found in 33. The predictive capacity of 13 variables which could realistically be known before the 30-month contact was analysed. Results. Seven variables were significantly associated with language delay in univariate analysis, but in logistic regression only five of these variables remained significant. Conclusion. The presence of one or more risk factors had a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 45%, but a positive predictive value of only 15%. The presence of one or more of these risk factors thus can not reliably be used to identify language delayed children, nor is it possible to define an “at risk” population because male gender was the only significant demographic factor and it had an unacceptably low specificity (52.5%). It is not possible to predict which children will have language delay at 30 months. Identification of this important ESSENCE disorder requires direct clinical contact with all families.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3618945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36189452013-04-10 Language Delay Is Not Predictable from Available Risk Factors Wilson, Philip McQuaige, Fiona Thompson, Lucy McConnachie, Alex ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Aims. To investigate factors associated with language delay in a cohort of 30-month-old children and determine if identification of language delay requires active contact with families. Methods. Data were collected at a pilot universal 30-month health contact. Health visitors used a simple two-item language screen. Data were obtained for 315 children; language delay was found in 33. The predictive capacity of 13 variables which could realistically be known before the 30-month contact was analysed. Results. Seven variables were significantly associated with language delay in univariate analysis, but in logistic regression only five of these variables remained significant. Conclusion. The presence of one or more risk factors had a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 45%, but a positive predictive value of only 15%. The presence of one or more of these risk factors thus can not reliably be used to identify language delayed children, nor is it possible to define an “at risk” population because male gender was the only significant demographic factor and it had an unacceptably low specificity (52.5%). It is not possible to predict which children will have language delay at 30 months. Identification of this important ESSENCE disorder requires direct clinical contact with all families. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3618945/ /pubmed/23576912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/947018 Text en Copyright © 2013 Philip Wilson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilson, Philip
McQuaige, Fiona
Thompson, Lucy
McConnachie, Alex
Language Delay Is Not Predictable from Available Risk Factors
title Language Delay Is Not Predictable from Available Risk Factors
title_full Language Delay Is Not Predictable from Available Risk Factors
title_fullStr Language Delay Is Not Predictable from Available Risk Factors
title_full_unstemmed Language Delay Is Not Predictable from Available Risk Factors
title_short Language Delay Is Not Predictable from Available Risk Factors
title_sort language delay is not predictable from available risk factors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3618945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23576912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/947018
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonphilip languagedelayisnotpredictablefromavailableriskfactors
AT mcquaigefiona languagedelayisnotpredictablefromavailableriskfactors
AT thompsonlucy languagedelayisnotpredictablefromavailableriskfactors
AT mcconnachiealex languagedelayisnotpredictablefromavailableriskfactors