Cargando…

A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine whether small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval alter oocyte yields in patients undergoing IVF in comparison to standard large diameter needles. METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study of 21 consecutive favorable prognosis patients. In eac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kushnir, Vitaly A, Kim, Ann, Gleicher, Norbert, Barad, David H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3620559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-22
_version_ 1782265623644995584
author Kushnir, Vitaly A
Kim, Ann
Gleicher, Norbert
Barad, David H
author_facet Kushnir, Vitaly A
Kim, Ann
Gleicher, Norbert
Barad, David H
author_sort Kushnir, Vitaly A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine whether small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval alter oocyte yields in patients undergoing IVF in comparison to standard large diameter needles. METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study of 21 consecutive favorable prognosis patients. In each patient one ovary was randomly allocated to retrieval with either a 20 G/ 35 mm (thin) or 17 G/ 35 mm (standard) needle, the other ovary was then retrieved with the opposite needle. RESULTS: The standard diameter needle was used to collect a total of 215 oocytes from 355 aspirated follicles (60.6%) compared to 203 oocytes from 352 aspirated follicles (57.7%) with the thinner needle (p = 0.23). Stratifying outcomes by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), as indicator of ovarian reserve, and by body mass index (BMI) the oocyte yields, still, did not differ (AMH, r (17) = −0.20, p = 0.44; BMI, r (17) =0.02, p = 0.96). Outcomes also did not vary among women with diminished ovarian reserve (p = 0.17) and in women with normal ovarian reserve (p = 1.00). Operating time was, however, significantly increased by 3.3 minutes per ovary (z = −3.08, p = 0.002) with the thinner needle. CONCLUSIONS: Needle diameter does not affect oocyte yield, including in obese patients and patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Thinner needles appear to significantly prolong operating time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3620559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36205592013-04-10 A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval Kushnir, Vitaly A Kim, Ann Gleicher, Norbert Barad, David H Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine whether small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval alter oocyte yields in patients undergoing IVF in comparison to standard large diameter needles. METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study of 21 consecutive favorable prognosis patients. In each patient one ovary was randomly allocated to retrieval with either a 20 G/ 35 mm (thin) or 17 G/ 35 mm (standard) needle, the other ovary was then retrieved with the opposite needle. RESULTS: The standard diameter needle was used to collect a total of 215 oocytes from 355 aspirated follicles (60.6%) compared to 203 oocytes from 352 aspirated follicles (57.7%) with the thinner needle (p = 0.23). Stratifying outcomes by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), as indicator of ovarian reserve, and by body mass index (BMI) the oocyte yields, still, did not differ (AMH, r (17) = −0.20, p = 0.44; BMI, r (17) =0.02, p = 0.96). Outcomes also did not vary among women with diminished ovarian reserve (p = 0.17) and in women with normal ovarian reserve (p = 1.00). Operating time was, however, significantly increased by 3.3 minutes per ovary (z = −3.08, p = 0.002) with the thinner needle. CONCLUSIONS: Needle diameter does not affect oocyte yield, including in obese patients and patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Thinner needles appear to significantly prolong operating time. BioMed Central 2013-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3620559/ /pubmed/23510450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-22 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kushnir et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kushnir, Vitaly A
Kim, Ann
Gleicher, Norbert
Barad, David H
A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval
title A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval
title_full A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval
title_fullStr A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval
title_full_unstemmed A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval
title_short A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval
title_sort pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3620559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-22
work_keys_str_mv AT kushnirvitalya apilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval
AT kimann apilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval
AT gleichernorbert apilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval
AT baraddavidh apilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval
AT kushnirvitalya pilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval
AT kimann pilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval
AT gleichernorbert pilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval
AT baraddavidh pilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval