Cargando…
A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine whether small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval alter oocyte yields in patients undergoing IVF in comparison to standard large diameter needles. METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study of 21 consecutive favorable prognosis patients. In eac...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3620559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-22 |
_version_ | 1782265623644995584 |
---|---|
author | Kushnir, Vitaly A Kim, Ann Gleicher, Norbert Barad, David H |
author_facet | Kushnir, Vitaly A Kim, Ann Gleicher, Norbert Barad, David H |
author_sort | Kushnir, Vitaly A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine whether small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval alter oocyte yields in patients undergoing IVF in comparison to standard large diameter needles. METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study of 21 consecutive favorable prognosis patients. In each patient one ovary was randomly allocated to retrieval with either a 20 G/ 35 mm (thin) or 17 G/ 35 mm (standard) needle, the other ovary was then retrieved with the opposite needle. RESULTS: The standard diameter needle was used to collect a total of 215 oocytes from 355 aspirated follicles (60.6%) compared to 203 oocytes from 352 aspirated follicles (57.7%) with the thinner needle (p = 0.23). Stratifying outcomes by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), as indicator of ovarian reserve, and by body mass index (BMI) the oocyte yields, still, did not differ (AMH, r (17) = −0.20, p = 0.44; BMI, r (17) =0.02, p = 0.96). Outcomes also did not vary among women with diminished ovarian reserve (p = 0.17) and in women with normal ovarian reserve (p = 1.00). Operating time was, however, significantly increased by 3.3 minutes per ovary (z = −3.08, p = 0.002) with the thinner needle. CONCLUSIONS: Needle diameter does not affect oocyte yield, including in obese patients and patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Thinner needles appear to significantly prolong operating time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3620559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36205592013-04-10 A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval Kushnir, Vitaly A Kim, Ann Gleicher, Norbert Barad, David H Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine whether small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval alter oocyte yields in patients undergoing IVF in comparison to standard large diameter needles. METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot study of 21 consecutive favorable prognosis patients. In each patient one ovary was randomly allocated to retrieval with either a 20 G/ 35 mm (thin) or 17 G/ 35 mm (standard) needle, the other ovary was then retrieved with the opposite needle. RESULTS: The standard diameter needle was used to collect a total of 215 oocytes from 355 aspirated follicles (60.6%) compared to 203 oocytes from 352 aspirated follicles (57.7%) with the thinner needle (p = 0.23). Stratifying outcomes by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), as indicator of ovarian reserve, and by body mass index (BMI) the oocyte yields, still, did not differ (AMH, r (17) = −0.20, p = 0.44; BMI, r (17) =0.02, p = 0.96). Outcomes also did not vary among women with diminished ovarian reserve (p = 0.17) and in women with normal ovarian reserve (p = 1.00). Operating time was, however, significantly increased by 3.3 minutes per ovary (z = −3.08, p = 0.002) with the thinner needle. CONCLUSIONS: Needle diameter does not affect oocyte yield, including in obese patients and patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Thinner needles appear to significantly prolong operating time. BioMed Central 2013-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3620559/ /pubmed/23510450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-22 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kushnir et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Kushnir, Vitaly A Kim, Ann Gleicher, Norbert Barad, David H A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval |
title | A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval |
title_full | A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval |
title_fullStr | A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval |
title_short | A pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval |
title_sort | pilot trial of large versus small diameter needles for oocyte retrieval |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3620559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kushnirvitalya apilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval AT kimann apilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval AT gleichernorbert apilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval AT baraddavidh apilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval AT kushnirvitalya pilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval AT kimann pilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval AT gleichernorbert pilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval AT baraddavidh pilottrialoflargeversussmalldiameterneedlesforoocyteretrieval |