Cargando…

Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock

Introduction. The accuracy and clinical applicability of an improved model-based system for tracking hemodynamic changes is assessed in an animal study on septic shock. Methods. This study used cardiovascular measurements recorded during a porcine trial studying the efficacy of large-pore hemofiltra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Revie, James A., Stevenson, David, Chase, J. Geoffrey, Pretty, Chris J., Lambermont, Bernard C., Ghuysen, Alexandre, Kolh, Philippe, Shaw, Geoffrey M., Desaive, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23585774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/505417
_version_ 1782265666714206208
author Revie, James A.
Stevenson, David
Chase, J. Geoffrey
Pretty, Chris J.
Lambermont, Bernard C.
Ghuysen, Alexandre
Kolh, Philippe
Shaw, Geoffrey M.
Desaive, Thomas
author_facet Revie, James A.
Stevenson, David
Chase, J. Geoffrey
Pretty, Chris J.
Lambermont, Bernard C.
Ghuysen, Alexandre
Kolh, Philippe
Shaw, Geoffrey M.
Desaive, Thomas
author_sort Revie, James A.
collection PubMed
description Introduction. The accuracy and clinical applicability of an improved model-based system for tracking hemodynamic changes is assessed in an animal study on septic shock. Methods. This study used cardiovascular measurements recorded during a porcine trial studying the efficacy of large-pore hemofiltration for treating septic shock. Four Pietrain pigs were instrumented and induced with septic shock. A subset of the measured data, representing clinically available measurements, was used to identify subject-specific cardiovascular models. These models were then validated against the remaining measurements. Results. The system accurately matched independent measures of left and right ventricle end diastolic volumes and maximum left and right ventricular pressures to percentage errors less than 20% (except for the 95th percentile error in maximum right ventricular pressure) and all R (2) > 0.76. An average decrease of 42% in systemic resistance, a main cardiovascular consequence of septic shock, was observed 120 minutes after the infusion of the endotoxin, consistent with experimentally measured trends. Moreover, modelled temporal trends in right ventricular end systolic elastance and afterload tracked changes in corresponding experimentally derived metrics. Conclusions. These results demonstrate that this model-based method can monitor disease-dependent changes in preload, afterload, and contractility in porcine study of septic shock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3621159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36211592013-04-12 Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock Revie, James A. Stevenson, David Chase, J. Geoffrey Pretty, Chris J. Lambermont, Bernard C. Ghuysen, Alexandre Kolh, Philippe Shaw, Geoffrey M. Desaive, Thomas Comput Math Methods Med Research Article Introduction. The accuracy and clinical applicability of an improved model-based system for tracking hemodynamic changes is assessed in an animal study on septic shock. Methods. This study used cardiovascular measurements recorded during a porcine trial studying the efficacy of large-pore hemofiltration for treating septic shock. Four Pietrain pigs were instrumented and induced with septic shock. A subset of the measured data, representing clinically available measurements, was used to identify subject-specific cardiovascular models. These models were then validated against the remaining measurements. Results. The system accurately matched independent measures of left and right ventricle end diastolic volumes and maximum left and right ventricular pressures to percentage errors less than 20% (except for the 95th percentile error in maximum right ventricular pressure) and all R (2) > 0.76. An average decrease of 42% in systemic resistance, a main cardiovascular consequence of septic shock, was observed 120 minutes after the infusion of the endotoxin, consistent with experimentally measured trends. Moreover, modelled temporal trends in right ventricular end systolic elastance and afterload tracked changes in corresponding experimentally derived metrics. Conclusions. These results demonstrate that this model-based method can monitor disease-dependent changes in preload, afterload, and contractility in porcine study of septic shock. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3621159/ /pubmed/23585774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/505417 Text en Copyright © 2013 James A. Revie et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Revie, James A.
Stevenson, David
Chase, J. Geoffrey
Pretty, Chris J.
Lambermont, Bernard C.
Ghuysen, Alexandre
Kolh, Philippe
Shaw, Geoffrey M.
Desaive, Thomas
Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock
title Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock
title_full Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock
title_short Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock
title_sort evaluation of a model-based hemodynamic monitoring method in a porcine study of septic shock
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23585774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/505417
work_keys_str_mv AT reviejamesa evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock
AT stevensondavid evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock
AT chasejgeoffrey evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock
AT prettychrisj evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock
AT lambermontbernardc evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock
AT ghuysenalexandre evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock
AT kolhphilippe evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock
AT shawgeoffreym evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock
AT desaivethomas evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock