Cargando…
Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock
Introduction. The accuracy and clinical applicability of an improved model-based system for tracking hemodynamic changes is assessed in an animal study on septic shock. Methods. This study used cardiovascular measurements recorded during a porcine trial studying the efficacy of large-pore hemofiltra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23585774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/505417 |
_version_ | 1782265666714206208 |
---|---|
author | Revie, James A. Stevenson, David Chase, J. Geoffrey Pretty, Chris J. Lambermont, Bernard C. Ghuysen, Alexandre Kolh, Philippe Shaw, Geoffrey M. Desaive, Thomas |
author_facet | Revie, James A. Stevenson, David Chase, J. Geoffrey Pretty, Chris J. Lambermont, Bernard C. Ghuysen, Alexandre Kolh, Philippe Shaw, Geoffrey M. Desaive, Thomas |
author_sort | Revie, James A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. The accuracy and clinical applicability of an improved model-based system for tracking hemodynamic changes is assessed in an animal study on septic shock. Methods. This study used cardiovascular measurements recorded during a porcine trial studying the efficacy of large-pore hemofiltration for treating septic shock. Four Pietrain pigs were instrumented and induced with septic shock. A subset of the measured data, representing clinically available measurements, was used to identify subject-specific cardiovascular models. These models were then validated against the remaining measurements. Results. The system accurately matched independent measures of left and right ventricle end diastolic volumes and maximum left and right ventricular pressures to percentage errors less than 20% (except for the 95th percentile error in maximum right ventricular pressure) and all R (2) > 0.76. An average decrease of 42% in systemic resistance, a main cardiovascular consequence of septic shock, was observed 120 minutes after the infusion of the endotoxin, consistent with experimentally measured trends. Moreover, modelled temporal trends in right ventricular end systolic elastance and afterload tracked changes in corresponding experimentally derived metrics. Conclusions. These results demonstrate that this model-based method can monitor disease-dependent changes in preload, afterload, and contractility in porcine study of septic shock. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3621159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36211592013-04-12 Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock Revie, James A. Stevenson, David Chase, J. Geoffrey Pretty, Chris J. Lambermont, Bernard C. Ghuysen, Alexandre Kolh, Philippe Shaw, Geoffrey M. Desaive, Thomas Comput Math Methods Med Research Article Introduction. The accuracy and clinical applicability of an improved model-based system for tracking hemodynamic changes is assessed in an animal study on septic shock. Methods. This study used cardiovascular measurements recorded during a porcine trial studying the efficacy of large-pore hemofiltration for treating septic shock. Four Pietrain pigs were instrumented and induced with septic shock. A subset of the measured data, representing clinically available measurements, was used to identify subject-specific cardiovascular models. These models were then validated against the remaining measurements. Results. The system accurately matched independent measures of left and right ventricle end diastolic volumes and maximum left and right ventricular pressures to percentage errors less than 20% (except for the 95th percentile error in maximum right ventricular pressure) and all R (2) > 0.76. An average decrease of 42% in systemic resistance, a main cardiovascular consequence of septic shock, was observed 120 minutes after the infusion of the endotoxin, consistent with experimentally measured trends. Moreover, modelled temporal trends in right ventricular end systolic elastance and afterload tracked changes in corresponding experimentally derived metrics. Conclusions. These results demonstrate that this model-based method can monitor disease-dependent changes in preload, afterload, and contractility in porcine study of septic shock. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3621159/ /pubmed/23585774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/505417 Text en Copyright © 2013 James A. Revie et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Revie, James A. Stevenson, David Chase, J. Geoffrey Pretty, Chris J. Lambermont, Bernard C. Ghuysen, Alexandre Kolh, Philippe Shaw, Geoffrey M. Desaive, Thomas Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock |
title | Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock |
title_full | Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock |
title_short | Evaluation of a Model-Based Hemodynamic Monitoring Method in a Porcine Study of Septic Shock |
title_sort | evaluation of a model-based hemodynamic monitoring method in a porcine study of septic shock |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23585774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/505417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reviejamesa evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock AT stevensondavid evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock AT chasejgeoffrey evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock AT prettychrisj evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock AT lambermontbernardc evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock AT ghuysenalexandre evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock AT kolhphilippe evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock AT shawgeoffreym evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock AT desaivethomas evaluationofamodelbasedhemodynamicmonitoringmethodinaporcinestudyofsepticshock |