Cargando…
Evaluation of Biomonitoring Data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a Risk Assessment Context: Perspectives across Chemicals
Background: Biomonitoring data reported in the National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals [NER; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012)] provide information on the presence and concentrations of > 400 chemicals in human blood and urine. Biomonitoring Equivalents (BEs)...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23232556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205740 |
_version_ | 1782265670972473344 |
---|---|
author | Aylward, Lesa L. Kirman, Christopher R. Schoeny, Rita Portier, Christopher J. Hays, Sean M. |
author_facet | Aylward, Lesa L. Kirman, Christopher R. Schoeny, Rita Portier, Christopher J. Hays, Sean M. |
author_sort | Aylward, Lesa L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Biomonitoring data reported in the National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals [NER; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012)] provide information on the presence and concentrations of > 400 chemicals in human blood and urine. Biomonitoring Equivalents (BEs) and other risk assessment–based values now allow interpretation of these biomonitoring data in a public health risk context. Objectives: We compared the measured biomarker concentrations in the NER with BEs and similar risk assessment values to provide an across-chemical risk assessment perspective on the measured levels for approximately 130 analytes in the NER. Methods: We identified available risk assessment–based biomarker screening values, including BEs and Human Biomonitoring-I (HBM-I) values from the German Human Biomonitoring Commission. Geometric mean and 95th percentile population biomarker concentrations from the NER were compared to the available screening values to generate chemical-specific hazard quotients (HQs) or cancer risk estimates. Conclusions: Most analytes in the NER show HQ values of < 1; however, some (including acrylamide, dioxin-like chemicals, benzene, xylene, several metals, di-2(ethylhexyl)phthalate, and some legacy organochlorine pesticides) approach or exceed HQ values of 1 or cancer risks of > 1 × 10(–4) at the geometric mean or 95th percentile, suggesting exposure levels may exceed published human health benchmarks. This analysis provides for the first time a means for examining population biomonitoring data for multiple environmental chemicals in the context of the risk assessments for those chemicals. The results of these comparisons can be used to focus more detailed chemical-specific examination of the data and inform priorities for chemical risk management and research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3621178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36211782013-04-11 Evaluation of Biomonitoring Data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a Risk Assessment Context: Perspectives across Chemicals Aylward, Lesa L. Kirman, Christopher R. Schoeny, Rita Portier, Christopher J. Hays, Sean M. Environ Health Perspect Review Background: Biomonitoring data reported in the National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals [NER; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012)] provide information on the presence and concentrations of > 400 chemicals in human blood and urine. Biomonitoring Equivalents (BEs) and other risk assessment–based values now allow interpretation of these biomonitoring data in a public health risk context. Objectives: We compared the measured biomarker concentrations in the NER with BEs and similar risk assessment values to provide an across-chemical risk assessment perspective on the measured levels for approximately 130 analytes in the NER. Methods: We identified available risk assessment–based biomarker screening values, including BEs and Human Biomonitoring-I (HBM-I) values from the German Human Biomonitoring Commission. Geometric mean and 95th percentile population biomarker concentrations from the NER were compared to the available screening values to generate chemical-specific hazard quotients (HQs) or cancer risk estimates. Conclusions: Most analytes in the NER show HQ values of < 1; however, some (including acrylamide, dioxin-like chemicals, benzene, xylene, several metals, di-2(ethylhexyl)phthalate, and some legacy organochlorine pesticides) approach or exceed HQ values of 1 or cancer risks of > 1 × 10(–4) at the geometric mean or 95th percentile, suggesting exposure levels may exceed published human health benchmarks. This analysis provides for the first time a means for examining population biomonitoring data for multiple environmental chemicals in the context of the risk assessments for those chemicals. The results of these comparisons can be used to focus more detailed chemical-specific examination of the data and inform priorities for chemical risk management and research. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2012-12-11 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3621178/ /pubmed/23232556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205740 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Review Aylward, Lesa L. Kirman, Christopher R. Schoeny, Rita Portier, Christopher J. Hays, Sean M. Evaluation of Biomonitoring Data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a Risk Assessment Context: Perspectives across Chemicals |
title | Evaluation of Biomonitoring Data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a Risk Assessment Context: Perspectives across Chemicals |
title_full | Evaluation of Biomonitoring Data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a Risk Assessment Context: Perspectives across Chemicals |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Biomonitoring Data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a Risk Assessment Context: Perspectives across Chemicals |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Biomonitoring Data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a Risk Assessment Context: Perspectives across Chemicals |
title_short | Evaluation of Biomonitoring Data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a Risk Assessment Context: Perspectives across Chemicals |
title_sort | evaluation of biomonitoring data from the cdc national exposure report in a risk assessment context: perspectives across chemicals |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23232556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205740 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aylwardlesal evaluationofbiomonitoringdatafromthecdcnationalexposurereportinariskassessmentcontextperspectivesacrosschemicals AT kirmanchristopherr evaluationofbiomonitoringdatafromthecdcnationalexposurereportinariskassessmentcontextperspectivesacrosschemicals AT schoenyrita evaluationofbiomonitoringdatafromthecdcnationalexposurereportinariskassessmentcontextperspectivesacrosschemicals AT portierchristopherj evaluationofbiomonitoringdatafromthecdcnationalexposurereportinariskassessmentcontextperspectivesacrosschemicals AT haysseanm evaluationofbiomonitoringdatafromthecdcnationalexposurereportinariskassessmentcontextperspectivesacrosschemicals |