Cargando…

Reporting of analyses from randomized controlled trials with multiple arms: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Multiple-arm randomized trials can be more complex in their design, data analysis, and result reporting than two-arm trials. We conducted a systematic review to assess the reporting of analyses in reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with multiple arms. METHODS: The literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Baron, Gabriel, Perrodeau, Elodie, Boutron, Isabelle, Ravaud, Philippe
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2013
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23531230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-84

Ejemplares similares

Reporting funding source or conflict of interest in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, no evidence of a large impact on general practitioners’ confidence in conclusions, a three-arm randomized controlled trial
por: du Vaure, Céline Buffel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses
por: Baudard, Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Timing and Completeness of Trial Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and Published in Journals
por: Riveros, Carolina, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
por: Yavchitz, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Impact of sending email reminders of the legal requirement for posting results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cohort embedded pragmatic randomized controlled trial
por: Maruani, Annabel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Meta-analyses including non-randomized studies of therapeutic interventions: a methodological review
por: Faber, Timor, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Ethgen, Morgane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Outcomes in Registered, Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials of Patient Education
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Inadequate description of educational interventions in ongoing randomized controlled trials
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials
por: Kapp, Philipp, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey
por: Heim, Amytis, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of “spin” in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients’/caregivers’ interpretation of treatment benefit
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Correction to: Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of “spin” in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients’/caregivers’ interpretation of treatment benefit
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Methods of Blinding in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Pharmacologic Treatments: A Systematic Review
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Interpretation of health news items reported with or without spin: protocol for a prospective meta-analysis of 16 randomised controlled trials
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Development and Evaluation of a Pedagogical Tool to Improve Understanding of a Quality Checklist: A Randomised Controlled Trial
por: Fourcade, Lola, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Efficacy of first dose of covid-19 vaccine versus no vaccination on symptoms of patients with long covid: target trial emulation based on ComPaRe e-cohort
por: Tran, Viet-Thi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial
por: Barnes, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Ethgen, Morgane, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Correction to: Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Comparison of serious adverse events posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in corresponding journal articles
por: Tang, Eve, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessment of transparency and selective reporting of interventional trials studying colorectal cancer
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence
por: Naidoo, Nivantha, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Geographical Representativeness of Published and Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials. The Example of: Tobacco Consumption and HIV Infection
por: Ahmad, Nizar, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov
por: Baudart, Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparison of Treatment Effect Estimates for Pharmacological Randomized Controlled Trials Enrolling Older Adults Only and Those including Adults: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
por: Seegers, Valérie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Variation in severe postpartum hemorrhage management: A national vignette-based study
por: Rousseau, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Factors associated with online media attention to research: a cohort study of articles evaluating cancer treatments
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Impact of Osteopathic Treatment on Pain in Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis – A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study
por: Hubert, Dominique, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Potential workload in applying clinical practice guidelines for patients with chronic conditions and multimorbidity: a systematic analysis
por: Buffel du Vaure, Céline, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

ASSIST Applicability Scoring of Surgical trials. An Investigator-reported aSsessment Tool
por: Tourabaly, Idriss, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The VEPRO trial: A cross-over randomised controlled trial comparing 2 progressive lenses for patients with presbyopia
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study
por: Yavchitz, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Applicability and generalisability of published results of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies evaluating four orthopaedic procedures: methodological systematic review
por: Pibouleau, Leslie, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Availability of Results of Trials Studying Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma over the Past 10 Years
por: Pellat, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_tt7k5jqpddck5rfuqb6oldv7gb