Cargando…
A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values
BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis of high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN) and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (WDHCC) represents a challenge to experienced hepatic clinicians, radiologists and hepatopathologists. METHODS: The expression profiles of aminoacylase-1 (ACY1), sequestosome-1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23537217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-161 |
_version_ | 1782265725757423616 |
---|---|
author | Jin, Guang-Zhi Dong, Hui Yu, Wen-Long Li, Yan Lu, Xin-Yuan Yu, Hua Xian, Zhi-Hong Dong, Wei Liu, Yin-Kun Cong, Wen-Ming Wu, Meng-Chao |
author_facet | Jin, Guang-Zhi Dong, Hui Yu, Wen-Long Li, Yan Lu, Xin-Yuan Yu, Hua Xian, Zhi-Hong Dong, Wei Liu, Yin-Kun Cong, Wen-Ming Wu, Meng-Chao |
author_sort | Jin, Guang-Zhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis of high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN) and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (WDHCC) represents a challenge to experienced hepatic clinicians, radiologists and hepatopathologists. METHODS: The expression profiles of aminoacylase-1 (ACY1), sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1) and glypican-3 (GPC3) in low-grade dysplastic nodules (LGDN), HGDN and WDHCC were assessed by immunohistochemistry. The differential diagnostic performances of these three markers alone and in combination for HGDN and WDHCC were investigated by logistic regression models (HGDN = 21; WDHCC = 32) and validated in an independent test set (HGDN, n = 21; WDHCC n = 24). Postoperative overall survival and time to recurrence were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses in an independent set of 500 patients. RESULTS: ACY1, SQSTM1 and GPC3 were differentially expressed in each group. For the differential diagnosis of WDHCC from HGDN, the sensitivity and specificity of the combination of ACY1 + SQSTM1 + GPC3 for detecting WDHCC were 93.8% and 95.2% respectively in the training set, which were higher than any of the three two-marker combinations. The validities of the four diagnostic models were further confirmed in an independent test set, and corresponding good sensitivity and specificity were observed. Interestingly, GPC3 expression in HCC tissues combined with serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) was found to be an independent predictor for overall survival and time to recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: ACY1 + SQSTM1 + GPC3 combination represents a potentially valuable biomarker for distinguishing between WDHCC and HGDN using immunohistochemistry. Meanwhile, low GPC3 staining combined with positive serum AFP may play a practical role in predicting poor postoperative outcome and high tumor recurrence risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3621586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36215862013-04-10 A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values Jin, Guang-Zhi Dong, Hui Yu, Wen-Long Li, Yan Lu, Xin-Yuan Yu, Hua Xian, Zhi-Hong Dong, Wei Liu, Yin-Kun Cong, Wen-Ming Wu, Meng-Chao BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis of high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN) and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (WDHCC) represents a challenge to experienced hepatic clinicians, radiologists and hepatopathologists. METHODS: The expression profiles of aminoacylase-1 (ACY1), sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1) and glypican-3 (GPC3) in low-grade dysplastic nodules (LGDN), HGDN and WDHCC were assessed by immunohistochemistry. The differential diagnostic performances of these three markers alone and in combination for HGDN and WDHCC were investigated by logistic regression models (HGDN = 21; WDHCC = 32) and validated in an independent test set (HGDN, n = 21; WDHCC n = 24). Postoperative overall survival and time to recurrence were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses in an independent set of 500 patients. RESULTS: ACY1, SQSTM1 and GPC3 were differentially expressed in each group. For the differential diagnosis of WDHCC from HGDN, the sensitivity and specificity of the combination of ACY1 + SQSTM1 + GPC3 for detecting WDHCC were 93.8% and 95.2% respectively in the training set, which were higher than any of the three two-marker combinations. The validities of the four diagnostic models were further confirmed in an independent test set, and corresponding good sensitivity and specificity were observed. Interestingly, GPC3 expression in HCC tissues combined with serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) was found to be an independent predictor for overall survival and time to recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: ACY1 + SQSTM1 + GPC3 combination represents a potentially valuable biomarker for distinguishing between WDHCC and HGDN using immunohistochemistry. Meanwhile, low GPC3 staining combined with positive serum AFP may play a practical role in predicting poor postoperative outcome and high tumor recurrence risk. BioMed Central 2013-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3621586/ /pubmed/23537217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-161 Text en Copyright © 2013 Jin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jin, Guang-Zhi Dong, Hui Yu, Wen-Long Li, Yan Lu, Xin-Yuan Yu, Hua Xian, Zhi-Hong Dong, Wei Liu, Yin-Kun Cong, Wen-Ming Wu, Meng-Chao A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values |
title | A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values |
title_full | A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values |
title_fullStr | A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values |
title_short | A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values |
title_sort | novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated hcc from dysplastic nodules and outcome values |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23537217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinguangzhi anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT donghui anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT yuwenlong anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT liyan anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT luxinyuan anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT yuhua anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT xianzhihong anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT dongwei anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT liuyinkun anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT congwenming anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT wumengchao anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT jinguangzhi novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT donghui novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT yuwenlong novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT liyan novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT luxinyuan novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT yuhua novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT xianzhihong novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT dongwei novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT liuyinkun novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT congwenming novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues AT wumengchao novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues |