Cargando…

A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values

BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis of high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN) and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (WDHCC) represents a challenge to experienced hepatic clinicians, radiologists and hepatopathologists. METHODS: The expression profiles of aminoacylase-1 (ACY1), sequestosome-1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Guang-Zhi, Dong, Hui, Yu, Wen-Long, Li, Yan, Lu, Xin-Yuan, Yu, Hua, Xian, Zhi-Hong, Dong, Wei, Liu, Yin-Kun, Cong, Wen-Ming, Wu, Meng-Chao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23537217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-161
_version_ 1782265725757423616
author Jin, Guang-Zhi
Dong, Hui
Yu, Wen-Long
Li, Yan
Lu, Xin-Yuan
Yu, Hua
Xian, Zhi-Hong
Dong, Wei
Liu, Yin-Kun
Cong, Wen-Ming
Wu, Meng-Chao
author_facet Jin, Guang-Zhi
Dong, Hui
Yu, Wen-Long
Li, Yan
Lu, Xin-Yuan
Yu, Hua
Xian, Zhi-Hong
Dong, Wei
Liu, Yin-Kun
Cong, Wen-Ming
Wu, Meng-Chao
author_sort Jin, Guang-Zhi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis of high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN) and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (WDHCC) represents a challenge to experienced hepatic clinicians, radiologists and hepatopathologists. METHODS: The expression profiles of aminoacylase-1 (ACY1), sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1) and glypican-3 (GPC3) in low-grade dysplastic nodules (LGDN), HGDN and WDHCC were assessed by immunohistochemistry. The differential diagnostic performances of these three markers alone and in combination for HGDN and WDHCC were investigated by logistic regression models (HGDN = 21; WDHCC = 32) and validated in an independent test set (HGDN, n = 21; WDHCC n = 24). Postoperative overall survival and time to recurrence were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses in an independent set of 500 patients. RESULTS: ACY1, SQSTM1 and GPC3 were differentially expressed in each group. For the differential diagnosis of WDHCC from HGDN, the sensitivity and specificity of the combination of ACY1 + SQSTM1 + GPC3 for detecting WDHCC were 93.8% and 95.2% respectively in the training set, which were higher than any of the three two-marker combinations. The validities of the four diagnostic models were further confirmed in an independent test set, and corresponding good sensitivity and specificity were observed. Interestingly, GPC3 expression in HCC tissues combined with serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) was found to be an independent predictor for overall survival and time to recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: ACY1 + SQSTM1 + GPC3 combination represents a potentially valuable biomarker for distinguishing between WDHCC and HGDN using immunohistochemistry. Meanwhile, low GPC3 staining combined with positive serum AFP may play a practical role in predicting poor postoperative outcome and high tumor recurrence risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3621586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36215862013-04-10 A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values Jin, Guang-Zhi Dong, Hui Yu, Wen-Long Li, Yan Lu, Xin-Yuan Yu, Hua Xian, Zhi-Hong Dong, Wei Liu, Yin-Kun Cong, Wen-Ming Wu, Meng-Chao BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis of high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN) and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (WDHCC) represents a challenge to experienced hepatic clinicians, radiologists and hepatopathologists. METHODS: The expression profiles of aminoacylase-1 (ACY1), sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1) and glypican-3 (GPC3) in low-grade dysplastic nodules (LGDN), HGDN and WDHCC were assessed by immunohistochemistry. The differential diagnostic performances of these three markers alone and in combination for HGDN and WDHCC were investigated by logistic regression models (HGDN = 21; WDHCC = 32) and validated in an independent test set (HGDN, n = 21; WDHCC n = 24). Postoperative overall survival and time to recurrence were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses in an independent set of 500 patients. RESULTS: ACY1, SQSTM1 and GPC3 were differentially expressed in each group. For the differential diagnosis of WDHCC from HGDN, the sensitivity and specificity of the combination of ACY1 + SQSTM1 + GPC3 for detecting WDHCC were 93.8% and 95.2% respectively in the training set, which were higher than any of the three two-marker combinations. The validities of the four diagnostic models were further confirmed in an independent test set, and corresponding good sensitivity and specificity were observed. Interestingly, GPC3 expression in HCC tissues combined with serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) was found to be an independent predictor for overall survival and time to recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: ACY1 + SQSTM1 + GPC3 combination represents a potentially valuable biomarker for distinguishing between WDHCC and HGDN using immunohistochemistry. Meanwhile, low GPC3 staining combined with positive serum AFP may play a practical role in predicting poor postoperative outcome and high tumor recurrence risk. BioMed Central 2013-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3621586/ /pubmed/23537217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-161 Text en Copyright © 2013 Jin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jin, Guang-Zhi
Dong, Hui
Yu, Wen-Long
Li, Yan
Lu, Xin-Yuan
Yu, Hua
Xian, Zhi-Hong
Dong, Wei
Liu, Yin-Kun
Cong, Wen-Ming
Wu, Meng-Chao
A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values
title A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values
title_full A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values
title_fullStr A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values
title_full_unstemmed A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values
title_short A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values
title_sort novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated hcc from dysplastic nodules and outcome values
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23537217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-161
work_keys_str_mv AT jinguangzhi anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT donghui anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT yuwenlong anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT liyan anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT luxinyuan anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT yuhua anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT xianzhihong anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT dongwei anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT liuyinkun anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT congwenming anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT wumengchao anovelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT jinguangzhi novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT donghui novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT yuwenlong novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT liyan novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT luxinyuan novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT yuhua novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT xianzhihong novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT dongwei novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT liuyinkun novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT congwenming novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues
AT wumengchao novelpanelofbiomarkersindistinctionofsmallwelldifferentiatedhccfromdysplasticnodulesandoutcomevalues