Cargando…
Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation
BACKGROUND: The cortical silent period (CSP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is affected by changes in TMS intensity. Some studies have shown that CSP is shortened or prolonged by short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF), Those studies,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23547559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-43 |
_version_ | 1782265730550464512 |
---|---|
author | Kojima, Sho Onishi, Hideaki Sugawara, Kazuhiro Kirimoto, Hikari Suzuki, Makoto Tamaki, Hiroyuki |
author_facet | Kojima, Sho Onishi, Hideaki Sugawara, Kazuhiro Kirimoto, Hikari Suzuki, Makoto Tamaki, Hiroyuki |
author_sort | Kojima, Sho |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The cortical silent period (CSP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is affected by changes in TMS intensity. Some studies have shown that CSP is shortened or prolonged by short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF), Those studies, however, used different TMS intensities to adjust the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP). Therefore, it is unclear whether changes in CSP duration are induced by changes in TMS intensities or by SICI and ICF. The purpose of this study was to confirm the effects of muscle contractions and stimulus intensities on MEP amplitude and the duration of CSP induced by single-pulse TMS and to clarify the effects of SICI and ICF on CSP duration. MEP evoked by TMS was detected from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle in 15 healthy subjects. First, MEP and CSP were induced by single-pulse TMS with an intensity of 100% active motor threshold (AMT) at four muscle contraction levels [10%, 30%, 50%, and 70% electromyogram (EMG)]. Next, MEP and CSP were induced by seven TMS intensities (100%, 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, 150%, and 160% AMT) during muscle contraction of 10% EMG. Finally, SICI and ICF were recorded at the four muscle contraction levels (0%, 10%, 30%, and 50% EMG). RESULTS: MEP amplitudes increased with increases in muscle contraction and stimulus intensity. However, CSP duration did not differ at different muscle contraction levels and was prolonged with increases in stimulus intensity. CSP was shortened with SICI compared with CSP induced by single-pulse TMS and with ICF at all muscle contraction levels, whereas CSP duration was not significantly changed with ICF. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that CSP duration is affected by TMS intensity but not by the muscle contraction level. This study demonstrated that CSP is shortened with SICI, but it is not altered with ICF. These results indicate that after SICI, CSP duration is affected by the activity of inhibitory intermediate neurons that are activated by the conditioning SICI stimulus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3621611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36216112013-04-10 Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation Kojima, Sho Onishi, Hideaki Sugawara, Kazuhiro Kirimoto, Hikari Suzuki, Makoto Tamaki, Hiroyuki BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: The cortical silent period (CSP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is affected by changes in TMS intensity. Some studies have shown that CSP is shortened or prolonged by short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF), Those studies, however, used different TMS intensities to adjust the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP). Therefore, it is unclear whether changes in CSP duration are induced by changes in TMS intensities or by SICI and ICF. The purpose of this study was to confirm the effects of muscle contractions and stimulus intensities on MEP amplitude and the duration of CSP induced by single-pulse TMS and to clarify the effects of SICI and ICF on CSP duration. MEP evoked by TMS was detected from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle in 15 healthy subjects. First, MEP and CSP were induced by single-pulse TMS with an intensity of 100% active motor threshold (AMT) at four muscle contraction levels [10%, 30%, 50%, and 70% electromyogram (EMG)]. Next, MEP and CSP were induced by seven TMS intensities (100%, 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, 150%, and 160% AMT) during muscle contraction of 10% EMG. Finally, SICI and ICF were recorded at the four muscle contraction levels (0%, 10%, 30%, and 50% EMG). RESULTS: MEP amplitudes increased with increases in muscle contraction and stimulus intensity. However, CSP duration did not differ at different muscle contraction levels and was prolonged with increases in stimulus intensity. CSP was shortened with SICI compared with CSP induced by single-pulse TMS and with ICF at all muscle contraction levels, whereas CSP duration was not significantly changed with ICF. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that CSP duration is affected by TMS intensity but not by the muscle contraction level. This study demonstrated that CSP is shortened with SICI, but it is not altered with ICF. These results indicate that after SICI, CSP duration is affected by the activity of inhibitory intermediate neurons that are activated by the conditioning SICI stimulus. BioMed Central 2013-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3621611/ /pubmed/23547559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-43 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kojima et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kojima, Sho Onishi, Hideaki Sugawara, Kazuhiro Kirimoto, Hikari Suzuki, Makoto Tamaki, Hiroyuki Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title | Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_full | Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_fullStr | Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_short | Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_sort | modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23547559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-43 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kojimasho modulationofthecorticalsilentperiodelicitedbysingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulation AT onishihideaki modulationofthecorticalsilentperiodelicitedbysingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulation AT sugawarakazuhiro modulationofthecorticalsilentperiodelicitedbysingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulation AT kirimotohikari modulationofthecorticalsilentperiodelicitedbysingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulation AT suzukimakoto modulationofthecorticalsilentperiodelicitedbysingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulation AT tamakihiroyuki modulationofthecorticalsilentperiodelicitedbysingleandpairedpulsetranscranialmagneticstimulation |