Cargando…

Stress Triangle: Do Introduced Predators Exert Indirect Costs on Native Predators and Prey?

Non-consumptive effects of predators on each other and on prey populations often exceed the effects of direct predation. These effects can arise from fear responses elevating glucocorticoid (GC) hormone levels (predator stress hypothesis) or from increased vigilance that reduces foraging efficiency...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anson, Jennifer R., Dickman, Chris R., Boonstra, Rudy, Jessop, Tim S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23585861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060916
_version_ 1782265742481162240
author Anson, Jennifer R.
Dickman, Chris R.
Boonstra, Rudy
Jessop, Tim S.
author_facet Anson, Jennifer R.
Dickman, Chris R.
Boonstra, Rudy
Jessop, Tim S.
author_sort Anson, Jennifer R.
collection PubMed
description Non-consumptive effects of predators on each other and on prey populations often exceed the effects of direct predation. These effects can arise from fear responses elevating glucocorticoid (GC) hormone levels (predator stress hypothesis) or from increased vigilance that reduces foraging efficiency and body condition (predator sensitive foraging hypothesis); both responses can lead to immunosuppression and increased parasite loads. Non-consumptive effects of invasive predators have been little studied, even though their direct impacts on local species are usually greater than those of their native counterparts. To address this issue, we explored the non-consumptive effects of the invasive red fox Vulpes vulpes on two native species in eastern Australia: a reptilian predator, the lace monitor Varanus varius and a marsupial, the ringtail possum Pseudocheirus peregrinus. In particular, we tested predictions derived from the above two hypotheses by comparing the basal glucocorticoid levels, foraging behaviour, body condition and haemoparasite loads of both native species in areas with and without fox suppression. Lace monitors showed no GC response or differences in haemoparasite loads but were more likely to trade safety for higher food rewards, and had higher body condition, in areas of fox suppression than in areas where foxes remained abundant. In contrast, ringtails showed no physiological or behavioural differences between fox-suppressed and control areas. Predator sensitive foraging is a non-consumptive cost for lace monitors in the presence of the fox and most likely represents a response to competition. The ringtail’s lack of response to the fox potentially represents complete naiveté or strong and rapid selection to the invasive predator. We suggest evolutionary responses are often overlooked in interactions between native and introduced species, but must be incorporated if we are to understand the suite of forces that shape community assembly and function in the wake of biological invasions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3621665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36216652013-04-12 Stress Triangle: Do Introduced Predators Exert Indirect Costs on Native Predators and Prey? Anson, Jennifer R. Dickman, Chris R. Boonstra, Rudy Jessop, Tim S. PLoS One Research Article Non-consumptive effects of predators on each other and on prey populations often exceed the effects of direct predation. These effects can arise from fear responses elevating glucocorticoid (GC) hormone levels (predator stress hypothesis) or from increased vigilance that reduces foraging efficiency and body condition (predator sensitive foraging hypothesis); both responses can lead to immunosuppression and increased parasite loads. Non-consumptive effects of invasive predators have been little studied, even though their direct impacts on local species are usually greater than those of their native counterparts. To address this issue, we explored the non-consumptive effects of the invasive red fox Vulpes vulpes on two native species in eastern Australia: a reptilian predator, the lace monitor Varanus varius and a marsupial, the ringtail possum Pseudocheirus peregrinus. In particular, we tested predictions derived from the above two hypotheses by comparing the basal glucocorticoid levels, foraging behaviour, body condition and haemoparasite loads of both native species in areas with and without fox suppression. Lace monitors showed no GC response or differences in haemoparasite loads but were more likely to trade safety for higher food rewards, and had higher body condition, in areas of fox suppression than in areas where foxes remained abundant. In contrast, ringtails showed no physiological or behavioural differences between fox-suppressed and control areas. Predator sensitive foraging is a non-consumptive cost for lace monitors in the presence of the fox and most likely represents a response to competition. The ringtail’s lack of response to the fox potentially represents complete naiveté or strong and rapid selection to the invasive predator. We suggest evolutionary responses are often overlooked in interactions between native and introduced species, but must be incorporated if we are to understand the suite of forces that shape community assembly and function in the wake of biological invasions. Public Library of Science 2013-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3621665/ /pubmed/23585861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060916 Text en © 2013 Anson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Anson, Jennifer R.
Dickman, Chris R.
Boonstra, Rudy
Jessop, Tim S.
Stress Triangle: Do Introduced Predators Exert Indirect Costs on Native Predators and Prey?
title Stress Triangle: Do Introduced Predators Exert Indirect Costs on Native Predators and Prey?
title_full Stress Triangle: Do Introduced Predators Exert Indirect Costs on Native Predators and Prey?
title_fullStr Stress Triangle: Do Introduced Predators Exert Indirect Costs on Native Predators and Prey?
title_full_unstemmed Stress Triangle: Do Introduced Predators Exert Indirect Costs on Native Predators and Prey?
title_short Stress Triangle: Do Introduced Predators Exert Indirect Costs on Native Predators and Prey?
title_sort stress triangle: do introduced predators exert indirect costs on native predators and prey?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23585861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060916
work_keys_str_mv AT ansonjenniferr stresstriangledointroducedpredatorsexertindirectcostsonnativepredatorsandprey
AT dickmanchrisr stresstriangledointroducedpredatorsexertindirectcostsonnativepredatorsandprey
AT boonstrarudy stresstriangledointroducedpredatorsexertindirectcostsonnativepredatorsandprey
AT jessoptims stresstriangledointroducedpredatorsexertindirectcostsonnativepredatorsandprey