Cargando…
Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review
Slaughterhouse wastes are a potential reservoir of bacterial, viral, prion and parasitic pathogens, capable of infecting both animals and humans. A quick, cost effective and safe disposal method is thus essential in order to reduce the risk of disease following animal slaughter. Different methods fo...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3622235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22694189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2012.694410 |
_version_ | 1782265812105560064 |
---|---|
author | Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H. Insam, Heribert |
author_facet | Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H. Insam, Heribert |
author_sort | Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Slaughterhouse wastes are a potential reservoir of bacterial, viral, prion and parasitic pathogens, capable of infecting both animals and humans. A quick, cost effective and safe disposal method is thus essential in order to reduce the risk of disease following animal slaughter. Different methods for the disposal of such wastes exist, including composting, anaerobic digestion (AD), alkaline hydrolysis (AH), rendering, incineration and burning. Composting is a disposal method that allows a recycling of the slaughterhouse waste nutrients back into the earth. The high fat and protein content of slaughterhouse wastes mean however, that such wastes are an excellent substrate for AD processes, resulting in both the disposal of wastes, a recycling of nutrients (soil amendment with sludge), and in methane production. Concerns exist as to whether AD and composting processes can inactivate pathogens. In contrast, AH is capable of the inactivation of almost all known microorganisms. This review was conducted in order to compare three different methods of slaughterhouse waste disposal, as regards to their ability to inactivate various microbial pathogens. The intention was to investigate whether AD could be used for waste disposal (either alone, or in combination with another process) such that both energy can be obtained and potentially hazardous materials be disposed of. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3622235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36222352013-04-12 Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H. Insam, Heribert Crit Rev Microbiol Review Article Slaughterhouse wastes are a potential reservoir of bacterial, viral, prion and parasitic pathogens, capable of infecting both animals and humans. A quick, cost effective and safe disposal method is thus essential in order to reduce the risk of disease following animal slaughter. Different methods for the disposal of such wastes exist, including composting, anaerobic digestion (AD), alkaline hydrolysis (AH), rendering, incineration and burning. Composting is a disposal method that allows a recycling of the slaughterhouse waste nutrients back into the earth. The high fat and protein content of slaughterhouse wastes mean however, that such wastes are an excellent substrate for AD processes, resulting in both the disposal of wastes, a recycling of nutrients (soil amendment with sludge), and in methane production. Concerns exist as to whether AD and composting processes can inactivate pathogens. In contrast, AH is capable of the inactivation of almost all known microorganisms. This review was conducted in order to compare three different methods of slaughterhouse waste disposal, as regards to their ability to inactivate various microbial pathogens. The intention was to investigate whether AD could be used for waste disposal (either alone, or in combination with another process) such that both energy can be obtained and potentially hazardous materials be disposed of. Informa Healthcare 2013-05 2012-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3622235/ /pubmed/22694189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2012.694410 Text en © 2013 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H. Insam, Heribert Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review |
title | Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review |
title_full | Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review |
title_fullStr | Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review |
title_short | Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review |
title_sort | treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: a review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3622235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22694189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2012.694410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frankewhittleingridh treatmentalternativesofslaughterhousewastesandtheireffectontheinactivationofdifferentpathogensareview AT insamheribert treatmentalternativesofslaughterhousewastesandtheireffectontheinactivationofdifferentpathogensareview |