Cargando…

Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review

Slaughterhouse wastes are a potential reservoir of bacterial, viral, prion and parasitic pathogens, capable of infecting both animals and humans. A quick, cost effective and safe disposal method is thus essential in order to reduce the risk of disease following animal slaughter. Different methods fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H., Insam, Heribert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3622235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22694189
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2012.694410
_version_ 1782265812105560064
author Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H.
Insam, Heribert
author_facet Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H.
Insam, Heribert
author_sort Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H.
collection PubMed
description Slaughterhouse wastes are a potential reservoir of bacterial, viral, prion and parasitic pathogens, capable of infecting both animals and humans. A quick, cost effective and safe disposal method is thus essential in order to reduce the risk of disease following animal slaughter. Different methods for the disposal of such wastes exist, including composting, anaerobic digestion (AD), alkaline hydrolysis (AH), rendering, incineration and burning. Composting is a disposal method that allows a recycling of the slaughterhouse waste nutrients back into the earth. The high fat and protein content of slaughterhouse wastes mean however, that such wastes are an excellent substrate for AD processes, resulting in both the disposal of wastes, a recycling of nutrients (soil amendment with sludge), and in methane production. Concerns exist as to whether AD and composting processes can inactivate pathogens. In contrast, AH is capable of the inactivation of almost all known microorganisms. This review was conducted in order to compare three different methods of slaughterhouse waste disposal, as regards to their ability to inactivate various microbial pathogens. The intention was to investigate whether AD could be used for waste disposal (either alone, or in combination with another process) such that both energy can be obtained and potentially hazardous materials be disposed of.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3622235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36222352013-04-12 Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H. Insam, Heribert Crit Rev Microbiol Review Article Slaughterhouse wastes are a potential reservoir of bacterial, viral, prion and parasitic pathogens, capable of infecting both animals and humans. A quick, cost effective and safe disposal method is thus essential in order to reduce the risk of disease following animal slaughter. Different methods for the disposal of such wastes exist, including composting, anaerobic digestion (AD), alkaline hydrolysis (AH), rendering, incineration and burning. Composting is a disposal method that allows a recycling of the slaughterhouse waste nutrients back into the earth. The high fat and protein content of slaughterhouse wastes mean however, that such wastes are an excellent substrate for AD processes, resulting in both the disposal of wastes, a recycling of nutrients (soil amendment with sludge), and in methane production. Concerns exist as to whether AD and composting processes can inactivate pathogens. In contrast, AH is capable of the inactivation of almost all known microorganisms. This review was conducted in order to compare three different methods of slaughterhouse waste disposal, as regards to their ability to inactivate various microbial pathogens. The intention was to investigate whether AD could be used for waste disposal (either alone, or in combination with another process) such that both energy can be obtained and potentially hazardous materials be disposed of. Informa Healthcare 2013-05 2012-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3622235/ /pubmed/22694189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2012.694410 Text en © 2013 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H.
Insam, Heribert
Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review
title Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review
title_full Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review
title_fullStr Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review
title_full_unstemmed Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review
title_short Treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: A review
title_sort treatment alternatives of slaughterhouse wastes, and their effect on the inactivation of different pathogens: a review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3622235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22694189
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2012.694410
work_keys_str_mv AT frankewhittleingridh treatmentalternativesofslaughterhousewastesandtheireffectontheinactivationofdifferentpathogensareview
AT insamheribert treatmentalternativesofslaughterhousewastesandtheireffectontheinactivationofdifferentpathogensareview