Cargando…

Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios

BACKGROUND: Forests play an important role in the global carbon flow. They can store carbon and can also provide wood which can substitute other materials. In EU27 the standing biomass is steadily increasing. Increments and harvests seem to have reached a plateau between 2005 and 2010. One reason fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kindermann, Georg E, Schörghuber, Stefan, Linkosalo, Tapio, Sanchez, Anabel, Rammer, Werner, Seidl, Rupert, Lexer, Manfred J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3622572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23369357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-8-2
_version_ 1782265845585543168
author Kindermann, Georg E
Schörghuber, Stefan
Linkosalo, Tapio
Sanchez, Anabel
Rammer, Werner
Seidl, Rupert
Lexer, Manfred J
author_facet Kindermann, Georg E
Schörghuber, Stefan
Linkosalo, Tapio
Sanchez, Anabel
Rammer, Werner
Seidl, Rupert
Lexer, Manfred J
author_sort Kindermann, Georg E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Forests play an important role in the global carbon flow. They can store carbon and can also provide wood which can substitute other materials. In EU27 the standing biomass is steadily increasing. Increments and harvests seem to have reached a plateau between 2005 and 2010. One reason for reaching this plateau will be the circumstance that the forests are getting older. High ages have the advantage that they typical show high carbon concentration and the disadvantage that the increment rates are decreasing. It should be investigated how biomass stock, harvests and increments will develop under different climate scenarios and two management scenarios where one is forcing to store high biomass amounts in forests and the other tries to have high increment rates and much harvested wood. RESULTS: A management which is maximising standing biomass will raise the stem wood carbon stocks from 30 tC/ha to 50 tC/ha until 2100. A management which is maximising increments will lower the stock to 20 tC/ha until 2100. The estimates for the climate scenarios A1b, B1 and E1 are different but there is much more effect by the management target than by the climate scenario. By maximising increments the harvests are 0.4 tC/ha/year higher than in the management which maximises the standing biomass. The increments until 2040 are close together but around 2100 the increments when maximising standing biomass are approximately 50 % lower than those when maximising increments. Cold regions will benefit from the climate changes in the climate scenarios by showing higher increments. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that forest management should maximise increments, not stocks to be more efficient in sense of climate change mitigation. This is true especially for regions which have already high carbon stocks in forests, what is the case in many regions in Europe. During the time span 2010–2100 the forests of EU27 will absorb additional 1750 million tC if they are managed to maximise increments compared if they are managed to maximise standing biomass. Incentives which will increase the standing biomass beyond the increment optimal biomass should therefore be avoided. Mechanisms which will maximise increments and sustainable harvests need to be developed to have substantial amounts of wood which can be used as substitution of non sustainable materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3622572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36225722013-04-15 Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios Kindermann, Georg E Schörghuber, Stefan Linkosalo, Tapio Sanchez, Anabel Rammer, Werner Seidl, Rupert Lexer, Manfred J Carbon Balance Manag Research BACKGROUND: Forests play an important role in the global carbon flow. They can store carbon and can also provide wood which can substitute other materials. In EU27 the standing biomass is steadily increasing. Increments and harvests seem to have reached a plateau between 2005 and 2010. One reason for reaching this plateau will be the circumstance that the forests are getting older. High ages have the advantage that they typical show high carbon concentration and the disadvantage that the increment rates are decreasing. It should be investigated how biomass stock, harvests and increments will develop under different climate scenarios and two management scenarios where one is forcing to store high biomass amounts in forests and the other tries to have high increment rates and much harvested wood. RESULTS: A management which is maximising standing biomass will raise the stem wood carbon stocks from 30 tC/ha to 50 tC/ha until 2100. A management which is maximising increments will lower the stock to 20 tC/ha until 2100. The estimates for the climate scenarios A1b, B1 and E1 are different but there is much more effect by the management target than by the climate scenario. By maximising increments the harvests are 0.4 tC/ha/year higher than in the management which maximises the standing biomass. The increments until 2040 are close together but around 2100 the increments when maximising standing biomass are approximately 50 % lower than those when maximising increments. Cold regions will benefit from the climate changes in the climate scenarios by showing higher increments. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that forest management should maximise increments, not stocks to be more efficient in sense of climate change mitigation. This is true especially for regions which have already high carbon stocks in forests, what is the case in many regions in Europe. During the time span 2010–2100 the forests of EU27 will absorb additional 1750 million tC if they are managed to maximise increments compared if they are managed to maximise standing biomass. Incentives which will increase the standing biomass beyond the increment optimal biomass should therefore be avoided. Mechanisms which will maximise increments and sustainable harvests need to be developed to have substantial amounts of wood which can be used as substitution of non sustainable materials. BioMed Central 2013-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3622572/ /pubmed/23369357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-8-2 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kindermann et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kindermann, Georg E
Schörghuber, Stefan
Linkosalo, Tapio
Sanchez, Anabel
Rammer, Werner
Seidl, Rupert
Lexer, Manfred J
Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios
title Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios
title_full Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios
title_fullStr Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios
title_short Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios
title_sort potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the european union under different management and climate scenarios
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3622572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23369357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-8-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kindermanngeorge potentialstocksandincrementsofwoodybiomassintheeuropeanunionunderdifferentmanagementandclimatescenarios
AT schorghuberstefan potentialstocksandincrementsofwoodybiomassintheeuropeanunionunderdifferentmanagementandclimatescenarios
AT linkosalotapio potentialstocksandincrementsofwoodybiomassintheeuropeanunionunderdifferentmanagementandclimatescenarios
AT sanchezanabel potentialstocksandincrementsofwoodybiomassintheeuropeanunionunderdifferentmanagementandclimatescenarios
AT rammerwerner potentialstocksandincrementsofwoodybiomassintheeuropeanunionunderdifferentmanagementandclimatescenarios
AT seidlrupert potentialstocksandincrementsofwoodybiomassintheeuropeanunionunderdifferentmanagementandclimatescenarios
AT lexermanfredj potentialstocksandincrementsofwoodybiomassintheeuropeanunionunderdifferentmanagementandclimatescenarios