Cargando…
Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process
INTRODUCTION: Evidence in the medical literature suggests that trial registration may not be preventing selective reporting of results. We wondered about the place of such information in the peer-review process. METHOD: We asked 1,503 corresponding authors of clinical trials and 1,733 reviewers to c...
Autores principales: | Mathieu, Sylvain, Chan, An-Wen, Ravaud, Philippe |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3622662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23593154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059910 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey
por: Heim, Amytis, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Outcomes in Registered, Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials of Patient Education
por: Pino, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Participant Informed Consent in Cluster Randomized Trials: Review
por: Giraudeau, Bruno, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov
por: Baudart, Marie, et al.
Publicado: (2016)