Cargando…

Development of a Childhood Attachment and Relational Trauma Screen (CARTS): a relational-socioecological framework for surveying attachment security and childhood trauma history

BACKGROUND: Current psychometric measures of childhood trauma history generally fail to assess the relational-socioecological context within which childhood maltreatment occurs, including the relationship of abusers to abused persons, the emotional availability of caregivers, and the respondent'...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frewen, Paul A., Evans, Barrie, Goodman, Jason, Halliday, Aaron, Boylan, James, Moran, Greg, Reiss, Jeffrey, Schore, Allan, Lanius, Ruth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3622711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23580403
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.20232
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Current psychometric measures of childhood trauma history generally fail to assess the relational-socioecological context within which childhood maltreatment occurs, including the relationship of abusers to abused persons, the emotional availability of caregivers, and the respondent's own thoughts, feelings, and actions in response to maltreatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a computerized approach to measuring the relational-socioecological context within which childhood maltreatment occurs. METHOD: The psychometric properties of a Childhood Attachment and Relational Trauma Screen (CARTS) were evaluated as a retrospective survey of childhood maltreatment history designed to be appropriate for completion by adults. Participants were undergraduates (n=222), an internet sample (n=123), and psychiatric outpatients (n=30). RESULTS: The internal reliability, convergent, and concurrent validity of the CARTS were supported across samples. Paired differences in means and correlations between rated item-descriptiveness to self, mothers, and fathers also accorded with findings of prior attachment and maltreatment research, illustrating the utility of assessing the occurrence and effects of maltreatment within a relational-socioecological framework. CONCLUSIONS: Results preliminarily support a new survey methodology for assessing childhood maltreatment within a relational-socioecological framework. Further psychometric evaluation of the CARTS is warranted.