Cargando…
Effect of GutGard in the Management of Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study
A randomized, double blind placebo controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of GutGard (root extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra) in the management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) gastric load. Participants diagnosed with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to two groups to orally...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23606875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/263805 |
_version_ | 1782265912810799104 |
---|---|
author | Puram, Sreenivasulu Suh, Hyung Chae Kim, Seung Un Bethapudi, Bharathi Joseph, Joshua Allan Agarwal, Amit Kudiganti, Venkateswarlu |
author_facet | Puram, Sreenivasulu Suh, Hyung Chae Kim, Seung Un Bethapudi, Bharathi Joseph, Joshua Allan Agarwal, Amit Kudiganti, Venkateswarlu |
author_sort | Puram, Sreenivasulu |
collection | PubMed |
description | A randomized, double blind placebo controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of GutGard (root extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra) in the management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) gastric load. Participants diagnosed with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to two groups to orally receive 150 mg of GutGard (n = 55) or placebo (n = 52) once daily for 60 days. H. pylori infection was assessed using (13)C-urea breath test ((13)C-UBT) at days 0, 30, and 60. Stool Antigen test (HpSA) was also performed on days 0, 30, and 60. Repeated measures of analysis of variance (RMANOVA), chi-square, and Fisher's exact probability tests were used to compare the treatment outcomes. A significant interaction effect between group and time (P = 0.00) and significant difference in mean Delta Over Baseline (DOB) values between GutGard (n = 50) and placebo (n = 50) treated groups after intervention period were observed. On day 60, the results of HpSA test were negative in 28 subjects (56%) in GutGard treated group whereas in placebo treated group only 2 subjects (4%) showed negative response; the difference between the groups was statistically significant. On day 60, the results of (13)C-UBT were negative in 24 (48%) in GutGard treated group and the difference between the groups was statistically significant. The findings suggest GutGard is effective in the management of H. pylori. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3623263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36232632013-04-19 Effect of GutGard in the Management of Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study Puram, Sreenivasulu Suh, Hyung Chae Kim, Seung Un Bethapudi, Bharathi Joseph, Joshua Allan Agarwal, Amit Kudiganti, Venkateswarlu Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article A randomized, double blind placebo controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of GutGard (root extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra) in the management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) gastric load. Participants diagnosed with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to two groups to orally receive 150 mg of GutGard (n = 55) or placebo (n = 52) once daily for 60 days. H. pylori infection was assessed using (13)C-urea breath test ((13)C-UBT) at days 0, 30, and 60. Stool Antigen test (HpSA) was also performed on days 0, 30, and 60. Repeated measures of analysis of variance (RMANOVA), chi-square, and Fisher's exact probability tests were used to compare the treatment outcomes. A significant interaction effect between group and time (P = 0.00) and significant difference in mean Delta Over Baseline (DOB) values between GutGard (n = 50) and placebo (n = 50) treated groups after intervention period were observed. On day 60, the results of HpSA test were negative in 28 subjects (56%) in GutGard treated group whereas in placebo treated group only 2 subjects (4%) showed negative response; the difference between the groups was statistically significant. On day 60, the results of (13)C-UBT were negative in 24 (48%) in GutGard treated group and the difference between the groups was statistically significant. The findings suggest GutGard is effective in the management of H. pylori. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3623263/ /pubmed/23606875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/263805 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sreenivasulu Puram et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Puram, Sreenivasulu Suh, Hyung Chae Kim, Seung Un Bethapudi, Bharathi Joseph, Joshua Allan Agarwal, Amit Kudiganti, Venkateswarlu Effect of GutGard in the Management of Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study |
title | Effect of GutGard in the Management of Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study |
title_full | Effect of GutGard in the Management of Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study |
title_fullStr | Effect of GutGard in the Management of Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of GutGard in the Management of Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study |
title_short | Effect of GutGard in the Management of Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study |
title_sort | effect of gutgard in the management of helicobacter pylori: a randomized double blind placebo controlled study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23606875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/263805 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT puramsreenivasulu effectofgutgardinthemanagementofhelicobacterpyloriarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy AT suhhyungchae effectofgutgardinthemanagementofhelicobacterpyloriarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy AT kimseungun effectofgutgardinthemanagementofhelicobacterpyloriarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy AT bethapudibharathi effectofgutgardinthemanagementofhelicobacterpyloriarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy AT josephjoshuaallan effectofgutgardinthemanagementofhelicobacterpyloriarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy AT agarwalamit effectofgutgardinthemanagementofhelicobacterpyloriarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy AT kudigantivenkateswarlu effectofgutgardinthemanagementofhelicobacterpyloriarandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy |