Cargando…

Endosymbiont diversity among sibling weevil species competing for the same resource

BACKGROUND: Whereas the impact of endosymbionts on the ecology of their hosts is well known in some insect species, the question of whether host communities are influenced by endosymbionts remains largely unanswered. Notably, the coexistence of host species competing with each other, which is expect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merville, Adrien, Venner, Samuel, Henri, Hélène, Vallier, Agnès, Menu, Frédéric, Vavre, Fabrice, Heddi, Abdelaziz, Bel-Venner, Marie-Claude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23379718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-28
_version_ 1782265949502570496
author Merville, Adrien
Venner, Samuel
Henri, Hélène
Vallier, Agnès
Menu, Frédéric
Vavre, Fabrice
Heddi, Abdelaziz
Bel-Venner, Marie-Claude
author_facet Merville, Adrien
Venner, Samuel
Henri, Hélène
Vallier, Agnès
Menu, Frédéric
Vavre, Fabrice
Heddi, Abdelaziz
Bel-Venner, Marie-Claude
author_sort Merville, Adrien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whereas the impact of endosymbionts on the ecology of their hosts is well known in some insect species, the question of whether host communities are influenced by endosymbionts remains largely unanswered. Notably, the coexistence of host species competing with each other, which is expected to be stabilized by their ecological differences, could be facilitated by differences in their endosymbionts. Yet, the composition of endosymbiotic communities housed by natural communities of competing host species is still almost unknown. In this study, we started filling this gap by describing and comparing the bacterial endosymbiotic communities of four sibling weevil species (Curculio spp.) that compete with each other to lay eggs into oak acorns (Quercus spp.) and exhibit marked ecological differences. RESULTS: All four species housed the primary endosymbiont Candidatus Curculioniphilus buchneri, yet each of these had a clearly distinct community of secondary endosymbionts, including Rickettsia, Spiroplasma, and two Wolbachia strains. Notably, three weevil species harbored their own predominant facultative endosymbiont and possessed the remaining symbionts at a residual infection level. CONCLUSIONS: The four competing species clearly harbor distinct endosymbiotic communities. We discuss how such endosymbiotic communities could spread and keep distinct in the four insect species, and how these symbionts might affect the organization and species richness of host communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3623666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36236662013-04-12 Endosymbiont diversity among sibling weevil species competing for the same resource Merville, Adrien Venner, Samuel Henri, Hélène Vallier, Agnès Menu, Frédéric Vavre, Fabrice Heddi, Abdelaziz Bel-Venner, Marie-Claude BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Whereas the impact of endosymbionts on the ecology of their hosts is well known in some insect species, the question of whether host communities are influenced by endosymbionts remains largely unanswered. Notably, the coexistence of host species competing with each other, which is expected to be stabilized by their ecological differences, could be facilitated by differences in their endosymbionts. Yet, the composition of endosymbiotic communities housed by natural communities of competing host species is still almost unknown. In this study, we started filling this gap by describing and comparing the bacterial endosymbiotic communities of four sibling weevil species (Curculio spp.) that compete with each other to lay eggs into oak acorns (Quercus spp.) and exhibit marked ecological differences. RESULTS: All four species housed the primary endosymbiont Candidatus Curculioniphilus buchneri, yet each of these had a clearly distinct community of secondary endosymbionts, including Rickettsia, Spiroplasma, and two Wolbachia strains. Notably, three weevil species harbored their own predominant facultative endosymbiont and possessed the remaining symbionts at a residual infection level. CONCLUSIONS: The four competing species clearly harbor distinct endosymbiotic communities. We discuss how such endosymbiotic communities could spread and keep distinct in the four insect species, and how these symbionts might affect the organization and species richness of host communities. BioMed Central 2013-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3623666/ /pubmed/23379718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-28 Text en Copyright © 2013 Merville et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Merville, Adrien
Venner, Samuel
Henri, Hélène
Vallier, Agnès
Menu, Frédéric
Vavre, Fabrice
Heddi, Abdelaziz
Bel-Venner, Marie-Claude
Endosymbiont diversity among sibling weevil species competing for the same resource
title Endosymbiont diversity among sibling weevil species competing for the same resource
title_full Endosymbiont diversity among sibling weevil species competing for the same resource
title_fullStr Endosymbiont diversity among sibling weevil species competing for the same resource
title_full_unstemmed Endosymbiont diversity among sibling weevil species competing for the same resource
title_short Endosymbiont diversity among sibling weevil species competing for the same resource
title_sort endosymbiont diversity among sibling weevil species competing for the same resource
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23379718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-28
work_keys_str_mv AT mervilleadrien endosymbiontdiversityamongsiblingweevilspeciescompetingforthesameresource
AT vennersamuel endosymbiontdiversityamongsiblingweevilspeciescompetingforthesameresource
AT henrihelene endosymbiontdiversityamongsiblingweevilspeciescompetingforthesameresource
AT vallieragnes endosymbiontdiversityamongsiblingweevilspeciescompetingforthesameresource
AT menufrederic endosymbiontdiversityamongsiblingweevilspeciescompetingforthesameresource
AT vavrefabrice endosymbiontdiversityamongsiblingweevilspeciescompetingforthesameresource
AT heddiabdelaziz endosymbiontdiversityamongsiblingweevilspeciescompetingforthesameresource
AT belvennermarieclaude endosymbiontdiversityamongsiblingweevilspeciescompetingforthesameresource