Cargando…

Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromsø study

BACKGROUND: Most current knowledge of the incidence of medical adverse events (AEs) comes from studies carried out in hospital settings. Little is known about AEs occurring outside hospitals, in spite the fact that most of contacts between patients and health care take place in primary care. Small s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hotvedt, Ragnar, Førde, Olav Helge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23384420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-46
_version_ 1782265951084871680
author Hotvedt, Ragnar
Førde, Olav Helge
author_facet Hotvedt, Ragnar
Førde, Olav Helge
author_sort Hotvedt, Ragnar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most current knowledge of the incidence of medical adverse events (AEs) comes from studies carried out in hospital settings. Little is known about AEs occurring outside hospitals, in spite the fact that most of contacts between patients and health care take place in primary care. Small sample population studies report that 4–49% of the general public have experienced AEs related to their own or family members´ care. The purpose with the present study was to investigate the occurrence of experienced medical adverse events in a large general population. METHODS: We invited 19763 inhabitants of a municipality in northern Norway, age 30 years and older, to fill in a questionnaire. Main outcome measures were life time prevalence of AEs experienced by respondents or their first degree relatives, perceived responsibility for and predictors of such events, as well as formal complaints as a reaction to the events. RESULTS: The response rate was 66%. Nine and 10% of the respondents reported self-experienced adverse events, and 15 and 19% (men and women, respectively) that their relatives had experienced AEs. Logistic regression models showed that the strongest predictors of reporting self-experienced adverse events were: Having been persuaded to accept an unwanted examination or treatment, difficulties in getting a referral from primary to specialist health care, and inadequate communication with the doctor. Of the respondents who had experienced adverse events personally, 62% placed the responsibility for the event on the general practitioner, 39% on the hospital doctor, and 19% on failing routines or cooperation. Only 7% of men and 14% of women who reported self-experienced events handed in a formal complaint. CONCLUSIONS: The public predominantly place the responsibility for medical adverse events on doctors, in particular general practitioners, and to a lesser degree on the system. This should be emphasised by doctors and managers who communicate with patients who have experienced AEs, and in patient safety work. Only a small fraction of adverse events results in a formal written complaint. Therefore, such complaints are of limited value as a basis for patient safety work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3623705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36237052013-04-12 Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromsø study Hotvedt, Ragnar Førde, Olav Helge BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Most current knowledge of the incidence of medical adverse events (AEs) comes from studies carried out in hospital settings. Little is known about AEs occurring outside hospitals, in spite the fact that most of contacts between patients and health care take place in primary care. Small sample population studies report that 4–49% of the general public have experienced AEs related to their own or family members´ care. The purpose with the present study was to investigate the occurrence of experienced medical adverse events in a large general population. METHODS: We invited 19763 inhabitants of a municipality in northern Norway, age 30 years and older, to fill in a questionnaire. Main outcome measures were life time prevalence of AEs experienced by respondents or their first degree relatives, perceived responsibility for and predictors of such events, as well as formal complaints as a reaction to the events. RESULTS: The response rate was 66%. Nine and 10% of the respondents reported self-experienced adverse events, and 15 and 19% (men and women, respectively) that their relatives had experienced AEs. Logistic regression models showed that the strongest predictors of reporting self-experienced adverse events were: Having been persuaded to accept an unwanted examination or treatment, difficulties in getting a referral from primary to specialist health care, and inadequate communication with the doctor. Of the respondents who had experienced adverse events personally, 62% placed the responsibility for the event on the general practitioner, 39% on the hospital doctor, and 19% on failing routines or cooperation. Only 7% of men and 14% of women who reported self-experienced events handed in a formal complaint. CONCLUSIONS: The public predominantly place the responsibility for medical adverse events on doctors, in particular general practitioners, and to a lesser degree on the system. This should be emphasised by doctors and managers who communicate with patients who have experienced AEs, and in patient safety work. Only a small fraction of adverse events results in a formal written complaint. Therefore, such complaints are of limited value as a basis for patient safety work. BioMed Central 2013-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3623705/ /pubmed/23384420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-46 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hotvedt and Førde.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hotvedt, Ragnar
Førde, Olav Helge
Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromsø study
title Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromsø study
title_full Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromsø study
title_fullStr Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromsø study
title_full_unstemmed Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromsø study
title_short Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromsø study
title_sort doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. a cross sectional population study. the tromsø study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23384420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-46
work_keys_str_mv AT hotvedtragnar doctorsaretoblameforperceivedmedicaladverseeventsacrosssectionalpopulationstudythetromsøstudy
AT førdeolavhelge doctorsaretoblameforperceivedmedicaladverseeventsacrosssectionalpopulationstudythetromsøstudy