Cargando…
Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Home-based models of hospice and palliative care are promoted with the argument that most people prefer to die at home. We examined the heterogeneity in preferences for home death and explored, for the first time, changes of preference with illness progression. METHODS: We searched for s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23414145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-12-7 |
_version_ | 1782265991172980736 |
---|---|
author | Gomes, Barbara Calanzani, Natalia Gysels, Marjolein Hall, Sue Higginson, Irene J |
author_facet | Gomes, Barbara Calanzani, Natalia Gysels, Marjolein Hall, Sue Higginson, Irene J |
author_sort | Gomes, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Home-based models of hospice and palliative care are promoted with the argument that most people prefer to die at home. We examined the heterogeneity in preferences for home death and explored, for the first time, changes of preference with illness progression. METHODS: We searched for studies on adult preferences for place of care at the end of life or place of death in MEDLINE (1966–2011), EMBASE (1980–2011), psycINFO (1967–2011), CINAHL (1982–2011), six palliative care journals (2006–11) and reference lists. Standard criteria were used to grade study quality and evidence strength. Scatter plots showed the percentage preferring home death amongst patients, lay caregivers and general public, by study quality, year, weighted by sample size. RESULTS: 210 studies reported preferences of just over 100,000 people from 33 countries, including 34,021 patients, 19,514 caregivers and 29,926 general public members. 68% of studies with quantitative data were of low quality; only 76 provided the question used to elicit preferences. There was moderate evidence that most people prefer a home death–this was found in 75% of studies, 9/14 of those of high quality. Amongst the latter and excluding outliers, home preference estimates ranged 31% to 87% for patients (9 studies), 25% to 64% for caregivers (5 studies), 49% to 70% for the public (4 studies). 20% of 1395 patients in 10 studies (2 of high quality) changed their preference, but statistical significance was untested. CONCLUSIONS: Controlling for methodological weaknesses, we found evidence that most people prefer to die at home. Around four fifths of patients did not change preference as their illness progressed. This supports focusing on home-based care for patients with advanced illness yet urges policy-makers to secure hospice and palliative care elsewhere for those who think differently or change their mind. Research must be clear on how preferences are elicited. There is an urgent need for studies examining change of preferences towards death. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3623898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36238982013-04-13 Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review Gomes, Barbara Calanzani, Natalia Gysels, Marjolein Hall, Sue Higginson, Irene J BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Home-based models of hospice and palliative care are promoted with the argument that most people prefer to die at home. We examined the heterogeneity in preferences for home death and explored, for the first time, changes of preference with illness progression. METHODS: We searched for studies on adult preferences for place of care at the end of life or place of death in MEDLINE (1966–2011), EMBASE (1980–2011), psycINFO (1967–2011), CINAHL (1982–2011), six palliative care journals (2006–11) and reference lists. Standard criteria were used to grade study quality and evidence strength. Scatter plots showed the percentage preferring home death amongst patients, lay caregivers and general public, by study quality, year, weighted by sample size. RESULTS: 210 studies reported preferences of just over 100,000 people from 33 countries, including 34,021 patients, 19,514 caregivers and 29,926 general public members. 68% of studies with quantitative data were of low quality; only 76 provided the question used to elicit preferences. There was moderate evidence that most people prefer a home death–this was found in 75% of studies, 9/14 of those of high quality. Amongst the latter and excluding outliers, home preference estimates ranged 31% to 87% for patients (9 studies), 25% to 64% for caregivers (5 studies), 49% to 70% for the public (4 studies). 20% of 1395 patients in 10 studies (2 of high quality) changed their preference, but statistical significance was untested. CONCLUSIONS: Controlling for methodological weaknesses, we found evidence that most people prefer to die at home. Around four fifths of patients did not change preference as their illness progressed. This supports focusing on home-based care for patients with advanced illness yet urges policy-makers to secure hospice and palliative care elsewhere for those who think differently or change their mind. Research must be clear on how preferences are elicited. There is an urgent need for studies examining change of preferences towards death. BioMed Central 2013-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3623898/ /pubmed/23414145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-12-7 Text en Copyright © 2013 Gomes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gomes, Barbara Calanzani, Natalia Gysels, Marjolein Hall, Sue Higginson, Irene J Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review |
title | Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review |
title_full | Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review |
title_short | Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review |
title_sort | heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23414145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-12-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gomesbarbara heterogeneityandchangesinpreferencesfordyingathomeasystematicreview AT calanzaninatalia heterogeneityandchangesinpreferencesfordyingathomeasystematicreview AT gyselsmarjolein heterogeneityandchangesinpreferencesfordyingathomeasystematicreview AT hallsue heterogeneityandchangesinpreferencesfordyingathomeasystematicreview AT higginsonirenej heterogeneityandchangesinpreferencesfordyingathomeasystematicreview |