Cargando…

Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Home-based models of hospice and palliative care are promoted with the argument that most people prefer to die at home. We examined the heterogeneity in preferences for home death and explored, for the first time, changes of preference with illness progression. METHODS: We searched for s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomes, Barbara, Calanzani, Natalia, Gysels, Marjolein, Hall, Sue, Higginson, Irene J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23414145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-12-7
_version_ 1782265991172980736
author Gomes, Barbara
Calanzani, Natalia
Gysels, Marjolein
Hall, Sue
Higginson, Irene J
author_facet Gomes, Barbara
Calanzani, Natalia
Gysels, Marjolein
Hall, Sue
Higginson, Irene J
author_sort Gomes, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Home-based models of hospice and palliative care are promoted with the argument that most people prefer to die at home. We examined the heterogeneity in preferences for home death and explored, for the first time, changes of preference with illness progression. METHODS: We searched for studies on adult preferences for place of care at the end of life or place of death in MEDLINE (1966–2011), EMBASE (1980–2011), psycINFO (1967–2011), CINAHL (1982–2011), six palliative care journals (2006–11) and reference lists. Standard criteria were used to grade study quality and evidence strength. Scatter plots showed the percentage preferring home death amongst patients, lay caregivers and general public, by study quality, year, weighted by sample size. RESULTS: 210 studies reported preferences of just over 100,000 people from 33 countries, including 34,021 patients, 19,514 caregivers and 29,926 general public members. 68% of studies with quantitative data were of low quality; only 76 provided the question used to elicit preferences. There was moderate evidence that most people prefer a home death–this was found in 75% of studies, 9/14 of those of high quality. Amongst the latter and excluding outliers, home preference estimates ranged 31% to 87% for patients (9 studies), 25% to 64% for caregivers (5 studies), 49% to 70% for the public (4 studies). 20% of 1395 patients in 10 studies (2 of high quality) changed their preference, but statistical significance was untested. CONCLUSIONS: Controlling for methodological weaknesses, we found evidence that most people prefer to die at home. Around four fifths of patients did not change preference as their illness progressed. This supports focusing on home-based care for patients with advanced illness yet urges policy-makers to secure hospice and palliative care elsewhere for those who think differently or change their mind. Research must be clear on how preferences are elicited. There is an urgent need for studies examining change of preferences towards death.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3623898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36238982013-04-13 Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review Gomes, Barbara Calanzani, Natalia Gysels, Marjolein Hall, Sue Higginson, Irene J BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Home-based models of hospice and palliative care are promoted with the argument that most people prefer to die at home. We examined the heterogeneity in preferences for home death and explored, for the first time, changes of preference with illness progression. METHODS: We searched for studies on adult preferences for place of care at the end of life or place of death in MEDLINE (1966–2011), EMBASE (1980–2011), psycINFO (1967–2011), CINAHL (1982–2011), six palliative care journals (2006–11) and reference lists. Standard criteria were used to grade study quality and evidence strength. Scatter plots showed the percentage preferring home death amongst patients, lay caregivers and general public, by study quality, year, weighted by sample size. RESULTS: 210 studies reported preferences of just over 100,000 people from 33 countries, including 34,021 patients, 19,514 caregivers and 29,926 general public members. 68% of studies with quantitative data were of low quality; only 76 provided the question used to elicit preferences. There was moderate evidence that most people prefer a home death–this was found in 75% of studies, 9/14 of those of high quality. Amongst the latter and excluding outliers, home preference estimates ranged 31% to 87% for patients (9 studies), 25% to 64% for caregivers (5 studies), 49% to 70% for the public (4 studies). 20% of 1395 patients in 10 studies (2 of high quality) changed their preference, but statistical significance was untested. CONCLUSIONS: Controlling for methodological weaknesses, we found evidence that most people prefer to die at home. Around four fifths of patients did not change preference as their illness progressed. This supports focusing on home-based care for patients with advanced illness yet urges policy-makers to secure hospice and palliative care elsewhere for those who think differently or change their mind. Research must be clear on how preferences are elicited. There is an urgent need for studies examining change of preferences towards death. BioMed Central 2013-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3623898/ /pubmed/23414145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-12-7 Text en Copyright © 2013 Gomes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gomes, Barbara
Calanzani, Natalia
Gysels, Marjolein
Hall, Sue
Higginson, Irene J
Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review
title Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review
title_full Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review
title_fullStr Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review
title_short Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review
title_sort heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23414145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-12-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gomesbarbara heterogeneityandchangesinpreferencesfordyingathomeasystematicreview
AT calanzaninatalia heterogeneityandchangesinpreferencesfordyingathomeasystematicreview
AT gyselsmarjolein heterogeneityandchangesinpreferencesfordyingathomeasystematicreview
AT hallsue heterogeneityandchangesinpreferencesfordyingathomeasystematicreview
AT higginsonirenej heterogeneityandchangesinpreferencesfordyingathomeasystematicreview