Cargando…

A prospective randomized study of conservative versus surgical treatment of unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal finger joint

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of conservative versus operative treatment for unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the fingers with respect to preservation of joint stability, mobility, and pain. The study was conducted as a prospective stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Werlinrud, Jens Christian, Petersen, Kirstin, Lauritsen, Jens, Larsen, Søren, Schrøder, Henrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23436143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-013-0154-y
_version_ 1782265997610188800
author Werlinrud, Jens Christian
Petersen, Kirstin
Lauritsen, Jens
Larsen, Søren
Schrøder, Henrik
author_facet Werlinrud, Jens Christian
Petersen, Kirstin
Lauritsen, Jens
Larsen, Søren
Schrøder, Henrik
author_sort Werlinrud, Jens Christian
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to assess the effect of conservative versus operative treatment for unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the fingers with respect to preservation of joint stability, mobility, and pain. The study was conducted as a prospective study in which 83 patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: (1) conservative treatment with a rigid splint for 2 weeks, (2) surgical reattachment of the palmar plate in local anesthesia followed by 2 weeks of immobilization in a plaster cast. Both groups were thereafter treated by taping to the neighboring finger for 3 weeks. With regard to hyperextension instability, stiffness, and pain, there is no significant difference in outcome between patients with traumatic palmar plate lesions and hyperextension instability treated with surgical repair and patients treated conservatively with a splint. We do not recommend primary surgical repair of unstable isolated palmar plate lesions in the proximal interphalangeal joints of the 4 ulnar fingers. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic, Level II.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3623926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36239262013-04-12 A prospective randomized study of conservative versus surgical treatment of unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal finger joint Werlinrud, Jens Christian Petersen, Kirstin Lauritsen, Jens Larsen, Søren Schrøder, Henrik Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Original Article The aim of this study was to assess the effect of conservative versus operative treatment for unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the fingers with respect to preservation of joint stability, mobility, and pain. The study was conducted as a prospective study in which 83 patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: (1) conservative treatment with a rigid splint for 2 weeks, (2) surgical reattachment of the palmar plate in local anesthesia followed by 2 weeks of immobilization in a plaster cast. Both groups were thereafter treated by taping to the neighboring finger for 3 weeks. With regard to hyperextension instability, stiffness, and pain, there is no significant difference in outcome between patients with traumatic palmar plate lesions and hyperextension instability treated with surgical repair and patients treated conservatively with a splint. We do not recommend primary surgical repair of unstable isolated palmar plate lesions in the proximal interphalangeal joints of the 4 ulnar fingers. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic, Level II. Springer Milan 2013-02-23 2013-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3623926/ /pubmed/23436143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-013-0154-y Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Werlinrud, Jens Christian
Petersen, Kirstin
Lauritsen, Jens
Larsen, Søren
Schrøder, Henrik
A prospective randomized study of conservative versus surgical treatment of unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal finger joint
title A prospective randomized study of conservative versus surgical treatment of unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal finger joint
title_full A prospective randomized study of conservative versus surgical treatment of unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal finger joint
title_fullStr A prospective randomized study of conservative versus surgical treatment of unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal finger joint
title_full_unstemmed A prospective randomized study of conservative versus surgical treatment of unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal finger joint
title_short A prospective randomized study of conservative versus surgical treatment of unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal finger joint
title_sort prospective randomized study of conservative versus surgical treatment of unstable palmar plate disruption in the proximal interphalangeal finger joint
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23436143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-013-0154-y
work_keys_str_mv AT werlinrudjenschristian aprospectiverandomizedstudyofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofunstablepalmarplatedisruptionintheproximalinterphalangealfingerjoint
AT petersenkirstin aprospectiverandomizedstudyofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofunstablepalmarplatedisruptionintheproximalinterphalangealfingerjoint
AT lauritsenjens aprospectiverandomizedstudyofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofunstablepalmarplatedisruptionintheproximalinterphalangealfingerjoint
AT larsensøren aprospectiverandomizedstudyofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofunstablepalmarplatedisruptionintheproximalinterphalangealfingerjoint
AT schrøderhenrik aprospectiverandomizedstudyofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofunstablepalmarplatedisruptionintheproximalinterphalangealfingerjoint
AT werlinrudjenschristian prospectiverandomizedstudyofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofunstablepalmarplatedisruptionintheproximalinterphalangealfingerjoint
AT petersenkirstin prospectiverandomizedstudyofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofunstablepalmarplatedisruptionintheproximalinterphalangealfingerjoint
AT lauritsenjens prospectiverandomizedstudyofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofunstablepalmarplatedisruptionintheproximalinterphalangealfingerjoint
AT larsensøren prospectiverandomizedstudyofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofunstablepalmarplatedisruptionintheproximalinterphalangealfingerjoint
AT schrøderhenrik prospectiverandomizedstudyofconservativeversussurgicaltreatmentofunstablepalmarplatedisruptionintheproximalinterphalangealfingerjoint