Cargando…

Set-level threshold-free tests on the intrinsic volumes of SPMs

Conventionally, set-level inference on statistical parametric maps (SPMs) is based on the topological features of an excursion set above some threshold—for example, the number of clusters or Euler characteristic. The expected Euler characteristic—under the null hypothesis—can be predicted from an in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnes, Gareth R., Ridgway, Gerard R., Flandin, Guillaume, Woolrich, Mark, Friston, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3625125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23246858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.046
_version_ 1782266069880143872
author Barnes, Gareth R.
Ridgway, Gerard R.
Flandin, Guillaume
Woolrich, Mark
Friston, Karl
author_facet Barnes, Gareth R.
Ridgway, Gerard R.
Flandin, Guillaume
Woolrich, Mark
Friston, Karl
author_sort Barnes, Gareth R.
collection PubMed
description Conventionally, set-level inference on statistical parametric maps (SPMs) is based on the topological features of an excursion set above some threshold—for example, the number of clusters or Euler characteristic. The expected Euler characteristic—under the null hypothesis—can be predicted from an intrinsic measure or volume of the SPM, such as the resel counts or the Lipschitz–Killing curvatures (LKC). We propose a new approach that performs a null hypothesis omnibus test on an SPM, by testing whether its intrinsic volume (described by LKC coefficients) is different from the volume of the underlying residual fields: intuitively, whether the number of peaks in the statistical field (testing for signal) and the residual fields (noise) are consistent or not. Crucially, this new test requires no arbitrary feature-defining threshold but is nevertheless sensitive to distributed or spatially extended patterns. We show the similarities between our approach and conventional topological inference—in terms of false positive rate control and sensitivity to treatment effects—in two and three dimensional simulations. The test consistently improves on classical approaches for moderate (> 20) degrees of freedom. We also demonstrate the application to real data and illustrate the comparison of the expected and observed Euler characteristics over the complete threshold range.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3625125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36251252013-04-15 Set-level threshold-free tests on the intrinsic volumes of SPMs Barnes, Gareth R. Ridgway, Gerard R. Flandin, Guillaume Woolrich, Mark Friston, Karl Neuroimage Article Conventionally, set-level inference on statistical parametric maps (SPMs) is based on the topological features of an excursion set above some threshold—for example, the number of clusters or Euler characteristic. The expected Euler characteristic—under the null hypothesis—can be predicted from an intrinsic measure or volume of the SPM, such as the resel counts or the Lipschitz–Killing curvatures (LKC). We propose a new approach that performs a null hypothesis omnibus test on an SPM, by testing whether its intrinsic volume (described by LKC coefficients) is different from the volume of the underlying residual fields: intuitively, whether the number of peaks in the statistical field (testing for signal) and the residual fields (noise) are consistent or not. Crucially, this new test requires no arbitrary feature-defining threshold but is nevertheless sensitive to distributed or spatially extended patterns. We show the similarities between our approach and conventional topological inference—in terms of false positive rate control and sensitivity to treatment effects—in two and three dimensional simulations. The test consistently improves on classical approaches for moderate (> 20) degrees of freedom. We also demonstrate the application to real data and illustrate the comparison of the expected and observed Euler characteristics over the complete threshold range. Academic Press 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3625125/ /pubmed/23246858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.046 Text en © 2013 Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Barnes, Gareth R.
Ridgway, Gerard R.
Flandin, Guillaume
Woolrich, Mark
Friston, Karl
Set-level threshold-free tests on the intrinsic volumes of SPMs
title Set-level threshold-free tests on the intrinsic volumes of SPMs
title_full Set-level threshold-free tests on the intrinsic volumes of SPMs
title_fullStr Set-level threshold-free tests on the intrinsic volumes of SPMs
title_full_unstemmed Set-level threshold-free tests on the intrinsic volumes of SPMs
title_short Set-level threshold-free tests on the intrinsic volumes of SPMs
title_sort set-level threshold-free tests on the intrinsic volumes of spms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3625125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23246858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.046
work_keys_str_mv AT barnesgarethr setlevelthresholdfreetestsontheintrinsicvolumesofspms
AT ridgwaygerardr setlevelthresholdfreetestsontheintrinsicvolumesofspms
AT flandinguillaume setlevelthresholdfreetestsontheintrinsicvolumesofspms
AT woolrichmark setlevelthresholdfreetestsontheintrinsicvolumesofspms
AT fristonkarl setlevelthresholdfreetestsontheintrinsicvolumesofspms