Cargando…

Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO(2) removal versus ‘conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: The prospective randomized Xtravent-study

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by damage to the lung caused by various insults, including ventilation itself, and tidal hyperinflation can lead to ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). We investigated the effects of a low tidal volume (V (T)) strategy (V (T) ≈ 3 ml...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bein, Thomas, Weber-Carstens, Steffen, Goldmann, Anton, Müller, Thomas, Staudinger, Thomas, Brederlau, Jörg, Muellenbach, Ralf, Dembinski, Rolf, Graf, Bernhard M., Wewalka, Marlene, Philipp, Alois, Wernecke, Klaus-Dieter, Lubnow, Matthias, Slutsky, Arthur S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3625408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23306584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2787-6
_version_ 1782266093185794048
author Bein, Thomas
Weber-Carstens, Steffen
Goldmann, Anton
Müller, Thomas
Staudinger, Thomas
Brederlau, Jörg
Muellenbach, Ralf
Dembinski, Rolf
Graf, Bernhard M.
Wewalka, Marlene
Philipp, Alois
Wernecke, Klaus-Dieter
Lubnow, Matthias
Slutsky, Arthur S.
author_facet Bein, Thomas
Weber-Carstens, Steffen
Goldmann, Anton
Müller, Thomas
Staudinger, Thomas
Brederlau, Jörg
Muellenbach, Ralf
Dembinski, Rolf
Graf, Bernhard M.
Wewalka, Marlene
Philipp, Alois
Wernecke, Klaus-Dieter
Lubnow, Matthias
Slutsky, Arthur S.
author_sort Bein, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by damage to the lung caused by various insults, including ventilation itself, and tidal hyperinflation can lead to ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). We investigated the effects of a low tidal volume (V (T)) strategy (V (T) ≈ 3 ml/kg/predicted body weight [PBW]) using pumpless extracorporeal lung assist in established ARDS. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled after a ‘stabilization period’ (24 h with optimized therapy and high PEEP). They were randomly assigned to receive a low V (T) ventilation (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO(2) elimination, or to a ARDSNet strategy (≈6 ml/kg) without the extracorporeal device. The primary outcome was the 28-days and 60-days ventilator-free days (VFD). Secondary outcome parameters were respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, analgesic/sedation use, complications and hospital mortality. RESULTS: Ventilation with very low V (T)’s was easy to implement with extracorporeal CO(2)-removal. VFD’s within 60 days were not different between the study group (33.2 ± 20) and the control group (29.2 ± 21, p = 0.469), but in more hypoxemic patients (PaO(2)/FIO(2) ≤150) a post hoc analysis demonstrated significant improved VFD-60 in study patients (40.9 ± 12.8) compared to control (28.2 ± 16.4, p = 0.033). The mortality rate was low (16.5 %) and did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of very low V (T) combined with extracorporeal CO(2) removal has the potential to further reduce VILI compared with a ‘normal’ lung protective management. Whether this strategy will improve survival in ARDS patients remains to be determined (Clinical trials NCT 00538928). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2787-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3625408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36254082013-04-15 Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO(2) removal versus ‘conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: The prospective randomized Xtravent-study Bein, Thomas Weber-Carstens, Steffen Goldmann, Anton Müller, Thomas Staudinger, Thomas Brederlau, Jörg Muellenbach, Ralf Dembinski, Rolf Graf, Bernhard M. Wewalka, Marlene Philipp, Alois Wernecke, Klaus-Dieter Lubnow, Matthias Slutsky, Arthur S. Intensive Care Med Original BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by damage to the lung caused by various insults, including ventilation itself, and tidal hyperinflation can lead to ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). We investigated the effects of a low tidal volume (V (T)) strategy (V (T) ≈ 3 ml/kg/predicted body weight [PBW]) using pumpless extracorporeal lung assist in established ARDS. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled after a ‘stabilization period’ (24 h with optimized therapy and high PEEP). They were randomly assigned to receive a low V (T) ventilation (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO(2) elimination, or to a ARDSNet strategy (≈6 ml/kg) without the extracorporeal device. The primary outcome was the 28-days and 60-days ventilator-free days (VFD). Secondary outcome parameters were respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, analgesic/sedation use, complications and hospital mortality. RESULTS: Ventilation with very low V (T)’s was easy to implement with extracorporeal CO(2)-removal. VFD’s within 60 days were not different between the study group (33.2 ± 20) and the control group (29.2 ± 21, p = 0.469), but in more hypoxemic patients (PaO(2)/FIO(2) ≤150) a post hoc analysis demonstrated significant improved VFD-60 in study patients (40.9 ± 12.8) compared to control (28.2 ± 16.4, p = 0.033). The mortality rate was low (16.5 %) and did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of very low V (T) combined with extracorporeal CO(2) removal has the potential to further reduce VILI compared with a ‘normal’ lung protective management. Whether this strategy will improve survival in ARDS patients remains to be determined (Clinical trials NCT 00538928). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2787-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2013-01-10 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3625408/ /pubmed/23306584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2787-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original
Bein, Thomas
Weber-Carstens, Steffen
Goldmann, Anton
Müller, Thomas
Staudinger, Thomas
Brederlau, Jörg
Muellenbach, Ralf
Dembinski, Rolf
Graf, Bernhard M.
Wewalka, Marlene
Philipp, Alois
Wernecke, Klaus-Dieter
Lubnow, Matthias
Slutsky, Arthur S.
Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO(2) removal versus ‘conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: The prospective randomized Xtravent-study
title Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO(2) removal versus ‘conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: The prospective randomized Xtravent-study
title_full Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO(2) removal versus ‘conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: The prospective randomized Xtravent-study
title_fullStr Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO(2) removal versus ‘conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: The prospective randomized Xtravent-study
title_full_unstemmed Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO(2) removal versus ‘conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: The prospective randomized Xtravent-study
title_short Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO(2) removal versus ‘conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: The prospective randomized Xtravent-study
title_sort lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal co(2) removal versus ‘conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ards: the prospective randomized xtravent-study
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3625408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23306584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2787-6
work_keys_str_mv AT beinthomas lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT webercarstenssteffen lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT goldmannanton lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT mullerthomas lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT staudingerthomas lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT brederlaujorg lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT muellenbachralf lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT dembinskirolf lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT grafbernhardm lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT wewalkamarlene lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT philippalois lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT werneckeklausdieter lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT lubnowmatthias lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy
AT slutskyarthurs lowertidalvolumestrategy3mlkgcombinedwithextracorporealco2removalversusconventionalprotectiveventilation6mlkginsevereardstheprospectiverandomizedxtraventstudy