Cargando…
Matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation for cartilage treatment: A systematic review
OBJECTIVES: Matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) has been developed and applied in the clinical practice in the last decade to overcome most of the disadvantages of the first generation procedures. The purpose of this systematic review is to document and analyse the availabl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3626217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23610698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.22.2000092 |
_version_ | 1782266167469015040 |
---|---|
author | Kon, E. Filardo, G. Di Matteo, B. Perdisa, F. Marcacci, M. |
author_facet | Kon, E. Filardo, G. Di Matteo, B. Perdisa, F. Marcacci, M. |
author_sort | Kon, E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) has been developed and applied in the clinical practice in the last decade to overcome most of the disadvantages of the first generation procedures. The purpose of this systematic review is to document and analyse the available literature on the results of MACT in the treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee. METHODS: All studies published in English addressing MACT procedures were identified, including those that fulfilled the following criteria: 1) level I-IV evidence, 2) measures of functional or clinical outcome, 3) outcome related to cartilage lesions of the knee cartilage. RESULTS: The literature analysis showed a progressively increasing number of articles per year. A total of 51 articles were selected: three randomised studies, ten comparative studies, 33 case series and five case reports. Several scaffolds have been developed and studied, with good results reported at short to medium follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: MACT procedures are a therapeutic option for the treatment of chondral lesions that can offer a positive outcome over time for specific patient categories, but high-level studies are lacking. Systematic long-term evaluation of these techniques and randomised controlled trials are necessary to confirm the potential of this treatment approach, especially when comparing against less ambitious traditional treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3626217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36262172013-04-22 Matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation for cartilage treatment: A systematic review Kon, E. Filardo, G. Di Matteo, B. Perdisa, F. Marcacci, M. Bone Joint Res Knee OBJECTIVES: Matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) has been developed and applied in the clinical practice in the last decade to overcome most of the disadvantages of the first generation procedures. The purpose of this systematic review is to document and analyse the available literature on the results of MACT in the treatment of chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee. METHODS: All studies published in English addressing MACT procedures were identified, including those that fulfilled the following criteria: 1) level I-IV evidence, 2) measures of functional or clinical outcome, 3) outcome related to cartilage lesions of the knee cartilage. RESULTS: The literature analysis showed a progressively increasing number of articles per year. A total of 51 articles were selected: three randomised studies, ten comparative studies, 33 case series and five case reports. Several scaffolds have been developed and studied, with good results reported at short to medium follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: MACT procedures are a therapeutic option for the treatment of chondral lesions that can offer a positive outcome over time for specific patient categories, but high-level studies are lacking. Systematic long-term evaluation of these techniques and randomised controlled trials are necessary to confirm the potential of this treatment approach, especially when comparing against less ambitious traditional treatments. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2013-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3626217/ /pubmed/23610698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.22.2000092 Text en ©2013 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery ©2013 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Knee Kon, E. Filardo, G. Di Matteo, B. Perdisa, F. Marcacci, M. Matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation for cartilage treatment: A systematic review |
title | Matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation
for cartilage treatment: A systematic review |
title_full | Matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation
for cartilage treatment: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation
for cartilage treatment: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation
for cartilage treatment: A systematic review |
title_short | Matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation
for cartilage treatment: A systematic review |
title_sort | matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation
for cartilage treatment: a systematic review |
topic | Knee |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3626217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23610698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.22.2000092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kone matrixassistedautologouschondrocytetransplantationforcartilagetreatmentasystematicreview AT filardog matrixassistedautologouschondrocytetransplantationforcartilagetreatmentasystematicreview AT dimatteob matrixassistedautologouschondrocytetransplantationforcartilagetreatmentasystematicreview AT perdisaf matrixassistedautologouschondrocytetransplantationforcartilagetreatmentasystematicreview AT marcaccim matrixassistedautologouschondrocytetransplantationforcartilagetreatmentasystematicreview |