Cargando…

Automatic thickness estimation for skeletal muscle in ultrasonography: evaluation of two enhancement methods

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography is a convenient technique to investigate muscle properties and has been widely used to look into muscle functions since it is non-invasive and real-time. Muscle thickness, a quantification which can effectively reflect the muscle activities during muscle contraction, is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Pan, Chen, Ye, Ao, Lijuan, Xie, Gaosheng, Li, Huihui, Wang, Lei, Zhou, Yongjin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3626569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23339544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-6
_version_ 1782266204382035968
author Han, Pan
Chen, Ye
Ao, Lijuan
Xie, Gaosheng
Li, Huihui
Wang, Lei
Zhou, Yongjin
author_facet Han, Pan
Chen, Ye
Ao, Lijuan
Xie, Gaosheng
Li, Huihui
Wang, Lei
Zhou, Yongjin
author_sort Han, Pan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography is a convenient technique to investigate muscle properties and has been widely used to look into muscle functions since it is non-invasive and real-time. Muscle thickness, a quantification which can effectively reflect the muscle activities during muscle contraction, is an important measure for musculoskeletal studies using ultrasonography. The traditional manual operation to read muscle thickness is subjective and time-consuming, therefore a number of studies have focused on the automatic estimation of muscle fascicle orientation and muscle thickness, to which the speckle noises in ultrasound images could be the major obstacle. There have been two popular methods proposed to enhance the hyperechoic regions over the speckles in ultrasonography, namely Gabor Filtering and Multiscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering (MVEF). METHODS: A study on gastrocnemius muscle is conducted to quantitatively evaluate whether and how these two methods could help the automatic estimation of the muscle thickness based on Revoting Hough Transform (RVHT). The muscle thickness results obtained from each of the two methods are compared with the results from manual measurement, respectively. Data from an aged subject with cerebral infarction is also studied. RESULTS: It’s shown in the experiments that, Gabor Filtering and MVEF can both enable RVHT to generate comparable results of muscle thickness to those by manual drawing (mean ± SD, 1.45 ± 0.48 and 1.38 ± 0.56 mm respectively). However, the MVEF method requires much less computation than Gabor Filtering. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods, as preprocessing procedure can enable RVHT the automatic estimation of muscle thickness and MVEF is believed to be a better choice for real-time applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3626569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36265692013-04-23 Automatic thickness estimation for skeletal muscle in ultrasonography: evaluation of two enhancement methods Han, Pan Chen, Ye Ao, Lijuan Xie, Gaosheng Li, Huihui Wang, Lei Zhou, Yongjin Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography is a convenient technique to investigate muscle properties and has been widely used to look into muscle functions since it is non-invasive and real-time. Muscle thickness, a quantification which can effectively reflect the muscle activities during muscle contraction, is an important measure for musculoskeletal studies using ultrasonography. The traditional manual operation to read muscle thickness is subjective and time-consuming, therefore a number of studies have focused on the automatic estimation of muscle fascicle orientation and muscle thickness, to which the speckle noises in ultrasound images could be the major obstacle. There have been two popular methods proposed to enhance the hyperechoic regions over the speckles in ultrasonography, namely Gabor Filtering and Multiscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering (MVEF). METHODS: A study on gastrocnemius muscle is conducted to quantitatively evaluate whether and how these two methods could help the automatic estimation of the muscle thickness based on Revoting Hough Transform (RVHT). The muscle thickness results obtained from each of the two methods are compared with the results from manual measurement, respectively. Data from an aged subject with cerebral infarction is also studied. RESULTS: It’s shown in the experiments that, Gabor Filtering and MVEF can both enable RVHT to generate comparable results of muscle thickness to those by manual drawing (mean ± SD, 1.45 ± 0.48 and 1.38 ± 0.56 mm respectively). However, the MVEF method requires much less computation than Gabor Filtering. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods, as preprocessing procedure can enable RVHT the automatic estimation of muscle thickness and MVEF is believed to be a better choice for real-time applications. BioMed Central 2013-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3626569/ /pubmed/23339544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-6 Text en Copyright © 2013 Han et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Han, Pan
Chen, Ye
Ao, Lijuan
Xie, Gaosheng
Li, Huihui
Wang, Lei
Zhou, Yongjin
Automatic thickness estimation for skeletal muscle in ultrasonography: evaluation of two enhancement methods
title Automatic thickness estimation for skeletal muscle in ultrasonography: evaluation of two enhancement methods
title_full Automatic thickness estimation for skeletal muscle in ultrasonography: evaluation of two enhancement methods
title_fullStr Automatic thickness estimation for skeletal muscle in ultrasonography: evaluation of two enhancement methods
title_full_unstemmed Automatic thickness estimation for skeletal muscle in ultrasonography: evaluation of two enhancement methods
title_short Automatic thickness estimation for skeletal muscle in ultrasonography: evaluation of two enhancement methods
title_sort automatic thickness estimation for skeletal muscle in ultrasonography: evaluation of two enhancement methods
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3626569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23339544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-12-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hanpan automaticthicknessestimationforskeletalmuscleinultrasonographyevaluationoftwoenhancementmethods
AT chenye automaticthicknessestimationforskeletalmuscleinultrasonographyevaluationoftwoenhancementmethods
AT aolijuan automaticthicknessestimationforskeletalmuscleinultrasonographyevaluationoftwoenhancementmethods
AT xiegaosheng automaticthicknessestimationforskeletalmuscleinultrasonographyevaluationoftwoenhancementmethods
AT lihuihui automaticthicknessestimationforskeletalmuscleinultrasonographyevaluationoftwoenhancementmethods
AT wanglei automaticthicknessestimationforskeletalmuscleinultrasonographyevaluationoftwoenhancementmethods
AT zhouyongjin automaticthicknessestimationforskeletalmuscleinultrasonographyevaluationoftwoenhancementmethods