Cargando…

Waiting management at the emergency department – a grounded theory study

BACKGROUND: An emergency department (ED) should offer timely care for acutely ill or injured persons that require the attention of specialized nurses and physicians. This study was aimed at exploring what is actually going on at an ED. METHODS: Qualitative data was collected 2009 to 2011 at one Swed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burström, Lena, Starrin, Bengt, Engström, Marie-Louise, Thulesius, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3626711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23496853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-95
_version_ 1782266236488384512
author Burström, Lena
Starrin, Bengt
Engström, Marie-Louise
Thulesius, Hans
author_facet Burström, Lena
Starrin, Bengt
Engström, Marie-Louise
Thulesius, Hans
author_sort Burström, Lena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An emergency department (ED) should offer timely care for acutely ill or injured persons that require the attention of specialized nurses and physicians. This study was aimed at exploring what is actually going on at an ED. METHODS: Qualitative data was collected 2009 to 2011 at one Swedish ED (ED1) with 53.000 yearly visits serving a population of 251.000. Constant comparative analysis according to classic grounded theory was applied to both focus group interviews with ED1 staff, participant observation data, and literature data. Quantitative data from ED1 and two other Swedish EDs were later analyzed and compared with the qualitative data. RESULTS: The main driver of the ED staff in this study was to reduce non-acceptable waiting. Signs of non-acceptable waiting are physical densification, contact seeking, and the emergence of critical situations. The staff reacts with frustration, shame, and eventually resignation when they cannot reduce non-acceptable waiting. Waiting management resolves the problems and is done either by reducing actual waiting time by increasing throughput of patient flow through structure pushing and shuffling around patients, or by changing the experience of waiting by calming patients and feinting maneuvers to cover up. CONCLUSION: To manage non-acceptable waiting is a driving force behind much of the staff behavior at an ED. Waiting management is done either by increasing throughput of patient flow or by changing the waiting experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3626711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36267112013-04-16 Waiting management at the emergency department – a grounded theory study Burström, Lena Starrin, Bengt Engström, Marie-Louise Thulesius, Hans BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: An emergency department (ED) should offer timely care for acutely ill or injured persons that require the attention of specialized nurses and physicians. This study was aimed at exploring what is actually going on at an ED. METHODS: Qualitative data was collected 2009 to 2011 at one Swedish ED (ED1) with 53.000 yearly visits serving a population of 251.000. Constant comparative analysis according to classic grounded theory was applied to both focus group interviews with ED1 staff, participant observation data, and literature data. Quantitative data from ED1 and two other Swedish EDs were later analyzed and compared with the qualitative data. RESULTS: The main driver of the ED staff in this study was to reduce non-acceptable waiting. Signs of non-acceptable waiting are physical densification, contact seeking, and the emergence of critical situations. The staff reacts with frustration, shame, and eventually resignation when they cannot reduce non-acceptable waiting. Waiting management resolves the problems and is done either by reducing actual waiting time by increasing throughput of patient flow through structure pushing and shuffling around patients, or by changing the experience of waiting by calming patients and feinting maneuvers to cover up. CONCLUSION: To manage non-acceptable waiting is a driving force behind much of the staff behavior at an ED. Waiting management is done either by increasing throughput of patient flow or by changing the waiting experience. BioMed Central 2013-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3626711/ /pubmed/23496853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-95 Text en Copyright © 2013 Burström et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Burström, Lena
Starrin, Bengt
Engström, Marie-Louise
Thulesius, Hans
Waiting management at the emergency department – a grounded theory study
title Waiting management at the emergency department – a grounded theory study
title_full Waiting management at the emergency department – a grounded theory study
title_fullStr Waiting management at the emergency department – a grounded theory study
title_full_unstemmed Waiting management at the emergency department – a grounded theory study
title_short Waiting management at the emergency department – a grounded theory study
title_sort waiting management at the emergency department – a grounded theory study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3626711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23496853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-95
work_keys_str_mv AT burstromlena waitingmanagementattheemergencydepartmentagroundedtheorystudy
AT starrinbengt waitingmanagementattheemergencydepartmentagroundedtheorystudy
AT engstrommarielouise waitingmanagementattheemergencydepartmentagroundedtheorystudy
AT thulesiushans waitingmanagementattheemergencydepartmentagroundedtheorystudy