Cargando…

Probabilistic strain optimization under constraint uncertainty

BACKGROUND: An important step in strain optimization is to identify reactions whose activities should be modified to achieve the desired cellular objective. Preferably, these reactions are identified systematically, as the number of possible combinations of reaction modifications could be very large...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yousofshahi, Mona, Orshansky, Michael, Lee, Kyongbum, Hassoun, Soha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3626866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23548040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-7-29
_version_ 1782266259450101760
author Yousofshahi, Mona
Orshansky, Michael
Lee, Kyongbum
Hassoun, Soha
author_facet Yousofshahi, Mona
Orshansky, Michael
Lee, Kyongbum
Hassoun, Soha
author_sort Yousofshahi, Mona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An important step in strain optimization is to identify reactions whose activities should be modified to achieve the desired cellular objective. Preferably, these reactions are identified systematically, as the number of possible combinations of reaction modifications could be very large. Over the last several years, a number of computational methods have been described for identifying combinations of reaction modifications. However, none of these methods explicitly address uncertainties in implementing the reaction activity modifications. In this work, we model the uncertainties as probability distributions in the flux carrying capacities of reactions. Based on this model, we develop an optimization method that identifies reactions for flux capacity modifications to predict outcomes with high statistical likelihood. RESULTS: We compare three optimization methods that select an intervention set comprising up- or down-regulation of reaction flux capacity: CCOpt (Chance constrained optimization), DetOpt (Deterministic optimization), and MCOpt (Monte Carlo-based optimization). We evaluate the methods using a Monte Carlo simulation-based method, MCEval (Monte Carlo Evaluations). We present two case studies analyzing a CHO cell and an adipocyte model. The flux capacity distributions required for our methods were estimated from maximal reaction velocities or elementary mode analysis. The intervention set selected by CCOpt consistently outperforms the intervention set selected by DetOpt in terms of tolerance to flux capacity variations. MCEval shows that the optimal flux predicted based on the CCOpt intervention set is more likely to be obtained, in a probabilistic sense, than the flux predicted by DetOpt. The intervention sets identified by CCOpt and MCOpt were similar; however, the exhaustive sampling required by MCOpt incurred significantly greater computational cost. CONCLUSIONS: Maximizing tolerance to variable engineering outcomes (in modifying enzyme activities) can identify intervention sets that statistically improve the desired cellular objective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3626866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36268662013-04-24 Probabilistic strain optimization under constraint uncertainty Yousofshahi, Mona Orshansky, Michael Lee, Kyongbum Hassoun, Soha BMC Syst Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: An important step in strain optimization is to identify reactions whose activities should be modified to achieve the desired cellular objective. Preferably, these reactions are identified systematically, as the number of possible combinations of reaction modifications could be very large. Over the last several years, a number of computational methods have been described for identifying combinations of reaction modifications. However, none of these methods explicitly address uncertainties in implementing the reaction activity modifications. In this work, we model the uncertainties as probability distributions in the flux carrying capacities of reactions. Based on this model, we develop an optimization method that identifies reactions for flux capacity modifications to predict outcomes with high statistical likelihood. RESULTS: We compare three optimization methods that select an intervention set comprising up- or down-regulation of reaction flux capacity: CCOpt (Chance constrained optimization), DetOpt (Deterministic optimization), and MCOpt (Monte Carlo-based optimization). We evaluate the methods using a Monte Carlo simulation-based method, MCEval (Monte Carlo Evaluations). We present two case studies analyzing a CHO cell and an adipocyte model. The flux capacity distributions required for our methods were estimated from maximal reaction velocities or elementary mode analysis. The intervention set selected by CCOpt consistently outperforms the intervention set selected by DetOpt in terms of tolerance to flux capacity variations. MCEval shows that the optimal flux predicted based on the CCOpt intervention set is more likely to be obtained, in a probabilistic sense, than the flux predicted by DetOpt. The intervention sets identified by CCOpt and MCOpt were similar; however, the exhaustive sampling required by MCOpt incurred significantly greater computational cost. CONCLUSIONS: Maximizing tolerance to variable engineering outcomes (in modifying enzyme activities) can identify intervention sets that statistically improve the desired cellular objective. BioMed Central 2013-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3626866/ /pubmed/23548040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-7-29 Text en Copyright © 2013 Yousofshahi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yousofshahi, Mona
Orshansky, Michael
Lee, Kyongbum
Hassoun, Soha
Probabilistic strain optimization under constraint uncertainty
title Probabilistic strain optimization under constraint uncertainty
title_full Probabilistic strain optimization under constraint uncertainty
title_fullStr Probabilistic strain optimization under constraint uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Probabilistic strain optimization under constraint uncertainty
title_short Probabilistic strain optimization under constraint uncertainty
title_sort probabilistic strain optimization under constraint uncertainty
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3626866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23548040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-7-29
work_keys_str_mv AT yousofshahimona probabilisticstrainoptimizationunderconstraintuncertainty
AT orshanskymichael probabilisticstrainoptimizationunderconstraintuncertainty
AT leekyongbum probabilisticstrainoptimizationunderconstraintuncertainty
AT hassounsoha probabilisticstrainoptimizationunderconstraintuncertainty