Cargando…

Analysis of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a well-described surgical technique and has gained wide clinical acceptance. Laparoscopic appendectomy offers fewer wound infections, faster recovery and an earlier return to work in comparison to open surgery. However, concerns still exist regarding the ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiudelis, Mindaugas, Ignatavicius, Povilas, Zviniene, Kristina, Grizas, Saulius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630557
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2011.31535
_version_ 1782266295290429440
author Kiudelis, Mindaugas
Ignatavicius, Povilas
Zviniene, Kristina
Grizas, Saulius
author_facet Kiudelis, Mindaugas
Ignatavicius, Povilas
Zviniene, Kristina
Grizas, Saulius
author_sort Kiudelis, Mindaugas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a well-described surgical technique and has gained wide clinical acceptance. Laparoscopic appendectomy offers fewer wound infections, faster recovery and an earlier return to work in comparison to open surgery. However, concerns still exist regarding the appendiceal stump closure. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the overall incidence and specific intraoperative and postoperative complications after application of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture versus endoloops for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred fifty two consecutive patients according to the following inclusion criteria were included in the study: 1. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed during the study period; 2. Acute phlegmonous or gangrenous appendicitis without perforation was diagnosed during operation. Exclusion criteria - patients with acute perforated appendicitis and local or diffuse peritonitis. Data was grouped according to the appendiceal stump closure technique, with either endoloops – 112 patients (73.7 percent) or intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture – 40 patients (26.3 per cent). The primary outcome measure was the rate of intraabdominal surgical-site infection, defined as post-operative intra-abdominal abscess. Secondary outcome variables were intraoperative and postoperative complications, duration of operation, hospital stay. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in overall intraoperative and postoperative complications rate and in hospital stay. The median duration of operation was significantly shorter when the endoloop was used. The use of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture instead of endoloop to close the appendiceal stump decreased the total cost of laparoscopic appendectomy. CONCLUSIONS: According our study results, intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture appendiceal stump closure technique is acceptable laparoscopic procedure, which intraoperative and postoperative results do not differ from endoloops technique. The total cost of this procedure is 80 € cheaper then endoloops technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3627155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36271552013-04-29 Analysis of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure Kiudelis, Mindaugas Ignatavicius, Povilas Zviniene, Kristina Grizas, Saulius Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a well-described surgical technique and has gained wide clinical acceptance. Laparoscopic appendectomy offers fewer wound infections, faster recovery and an earlier return to work in comparison to open surgery. However, concerns still exist regarding the appendiceal stump closure. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the overall incidence and specific intraoperative and postoperative complications after application of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture versus endoloops for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred fifty two consecutive patients according to the following inclusion criteria were included in the study: 1. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed during the study period; 2. Acute phlegmonous or gangrenous appendicitis without perforation was diagnosed during operation. Exclusion criteria - patients with acute perforated appendicitis and local or diffuse peritonitis. Data was grouped according to the appendiceal stump closure technique, with either endoloops – 112 patients (73.7 percent) or intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture – 40 patients (26.3 per cent). The primary outcome measure was the rate of intraabdominal surgical-site infection, defined as post-operative intra-abdominal abscess. Secondary outcome variables were intraoperative and postoperative complications, duration of operation, hospital stay. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in overall intraoperative and postoperative complications rate and in hospital stay. The median duration of operation was significantly shorter when the endoloop was used. The use of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture instead of endoloop to close the appendiceal stump decreased the total cost of laparoscopic appendectomy. CONCLUSIONS: According our study results, intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture appendiceal stump closure technique is acceptable laparoscopic procedure, which intraoperative and postoperative results do not differ from endoloops technique. The total cost of this procedure is 80 € cheaper then endoloops technique. Termedia Publishing House 2012-10-30 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3627155/ /pubmed/23630557 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2011.31535 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sekcja Wideochirurgii TChP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kiudelis, Mindaugas
Ignatavicius, Povilas
Zviniene, Kristina
Grizas, Saulius
Analysis of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure
title Analysis of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure
title_full Analysis of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure
title_fullStr Analysis of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure
title_short Analysis of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure
title_sort analysis of intracorporeal knotting with invaginating suture versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23630557
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2011.31535
work_keys_str_mv AT kiudelismindaugas analysisofintracorporealknottingwithinvaginatingsutureversusendoloopsinappendicealstumpclosure
AT ignataviciuspovilas analysisofintracorporealknottingwithinvaginatingsutureversusendoloopsinappendicealstumpclosure
AT zvinienekristina analysisofintracorporealknottingwithinvaginatingsutureversusendoloopsinappendicealstumpclosure
AT grizassaulius analysisofintracorporealknottingwithinvaginatingsutureversusendoloopsinappendicealstumpclosure