Cargando…
Quantitative analysis of TALE–DNA interactions suggests polarity effects
Transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) have revolutionized the field of genome engineering. We present here a systematic assessment of TALE DNA recognition, using quantitative electrophoretic mobility shift assays and reporter gene activation assays. Within TALE proteins, tandem 34-amino aci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23408851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt085 |
_version_ | 1782266321340203008 |
---|---|
author | Meckler, Joshua F. Bhakta, Mital S. Kim, Moon-Soo Ovadia, Robert Habrian, Chris H. Zykovich, Artem Yu, Abigail Lockwood, Sarah H. Morbitzer, Robert Elsäesser, Janett Lahaye, Thomas Segal, David J. Baldwin, Enoch P. |
author_facet | Meckler, Joshua F. Bhakta, Mital S. Kim, Moon-Soo Ovadia, Robert Habrian, Chris H. Zykovich, Artem Yu, Abigail Lockwood, Sarah H. Morbitzer, Robert Elsäesser, Janett Lahaye, Thomas Segal, David J. Baldwin, Enoch P. |
author_sort | Meckler, Joshua F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) have revolutionized the field of genome engineering. We present here a systematic assessment of TALE DNA recognition, using quantitative electrophoretic mobility shift assays and reporter gene activation assays. Within TALE proteins, tandem 34-amino acid repeats recognize one base pair each and direct sequence-specific DNA binding through repeat variable di-residues (RVDs). We found that RVD choice can affect affinity by four orders of magnitude, with the relative RVD contribution in the order NG > HD ∼ NN ≫ NI > NK. The NN repeat preferred the base G over A, whereas the NK repeat bound G with 10(3)-fold lower affinity. We compared AvrBs3, a naturally occurring TALE that recognizes its target using some atypical RVD-base combinations, with a designed TALE that precisely matches ‘standard’ RVDs with the target bases. This comparison revealed unexpected differences in sensitivity to substitutions of the invariant 5′-T. Another surprising observation was that base mismatches at the 5′ end of the target site had more disruptive effects on affinity than those at the 3′ end, particularly in designed TALEs. These results provide evidence that TALE–DNA recognition exhibits a hitherto un-described polarity effect, in which the N-terminal repeats contribute more to affinity than C-terminal ones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3627578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36275782013-04-17 Quantitative analysis of TALE–DNA interactions suggests polarity effects Meckler, Joshua F. Bhakta, Mital S. Kim, Moon-Soo Ovadia, Robert Habrian, Chris H. Zykovich, Artem Yu, Abigail Lockwood, Sarah H. Morbitzer, Robert Elsäesser, Janett Lahaye, Thomas Segal, David J. Baldwin, Enoch P. Nucleic Acids Res Molecular Biology Transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) have revolutionized the field of genome engineering. We present here a systematic assessment of TALE DNA recognition, using quantitative electrophoretic mobility shift assays and reporter gene activation assays. Within TALE proteins, tandem 34-amino acid repeats recognize one base pair each and direct sequence-specific DNA binding through repeat variable di-residues (RVDs). We found that RVD choice can affect affinity by four orders of magnitude, with the relative RVD contribution in the order NG > HD ∼ NN ≫ NI > NK. The NN repeat preferred the base G over A, whereas the NK repeat bound G with 10(3)-fold lower affinity. We compared AvrBs3, a naturally occurring TALE that recognizes its target using some atypical RVD-base combinations, with a designed TALE that precisely matches ‘standard’ RVDs with the target bases. This comparison revealed unexpected differences in sensitivity to substitutions of the invariant 5′-T. Another surprising observation was that base mismatches at the 5′ end of the target site had more disruptive effects on affinity than those at the 3′ end, particularly in designed TALEs. These results provide evidence that TALE–DNA recognition exhibits a hitherto un-described polarity effect, in which the N-terminal repeats contribute more to affinity than C-terminal ones. Oxford University Press 2013-04 2013-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3627578/ /pubmed/23408851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt085 Text en © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Molecular Biology Meckler, Joshua F. Bhakta, Mital S. Kim, Moon-Soo Ovadia, Robert Habrian, Chris H. Zykovich, Artem Yu, Abigail Lockwood, Sarah H. Morbitzer, Robert Elsäesser, Janett Lahaye, Thomas Segal, David J. Baldwin, Enoch P. Quantitative analysis of TALE–DNA interactions suggests polarity effects |
title | Quantitative analysis of TALE–DNA interactions suggests polarity effects |
title_full | Quantitative analysis of TALE–DNA interactions suggests polarity effects |
title_fullStr | Quantitative analysis of TALE–DNA interactions suggests polarity effects |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative analysis of TALE–DNA interactions suggests polarity effects |
title_short | Quantitative analysis of TALE–DNA interactions suggests polarity effects |
title_sort | quantitative analysis of tale–dna interactions suggests polarity effects |
topic | Molecular Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23408851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mecklerjoshuaf quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects AT bhaktamitals quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects AT kimmoonsoo quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects AT ovadiarobert quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects AT habrianchrish quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects AT zykovichartem quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects AT yuabigail quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects AT lockwoodsarahh quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects AT morbitzerrobert quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects AT elsaesserjanett quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects AT lahayethomas quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects AT segaldavidj quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects AT baldwinenochp quantitativeanalysisoftalednainteractionssuggestspolarityeffects |