Cargando…

Wild edible plants of Belarus: from Rostafiński’s questionnaire of 1883 to the present

BACKGROUND: Belarus is an Eastern European country, which has been little studied ethnobotanically. The aim of the study was to compare largely unpublished 19th century sources with more contemporary data on the use of wild food plants. METHODS: The information on 19th century uses is based on twelv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Łuczaj, Łukasz, Köhler, Piotr, Pirożnikow, Ewa, Graniszewska, Maja, Pieroni, Andrea, Gervasi, Tanya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23557012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-9-21
_version_ 1782266334818598912
author Łuczaj, Łukasz
Köhler, Piotr
Pirożnikow, Ewa
Graniszewska, Maja
Pieroni, Andrea
Gervasi, Tanya
author_facet Łuczaj, Łukasz
Köhler, Piotr
Pirożnikow, Ewa
Graniszewska, Maja
Pieroni, Andrea
Gervasi, Tanya
author_sort Łuczaj, Łukasz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Belarus is an Eastern European country, which has been little studied ethnobotanically. The aim of the study was to compare largely unpublished 19th century sources with more contemporary data on the use of wild food plants. METHODS: The information on 19th century uses is based on twelve, mainly unpublished, responses to Józef Rostafiński’s questionnaire from 1883, and the newly discovered materials of the ethnographer Michał Federowski, who structured his data according to Rostafiński’s questionnaire and documented it with voucher specimens. Rostafiński’s questionnaire was concerned mainly with Polish territories, but for historical reasons this also encompassed a large part of Belarus, and we analyzed only the twelve responses (out of the few hundred Rostafiński obtained), which concerned the present Belarus. These data were compared with a few 20th century ethnographic sources, and our own 40 interviews and questionnaires from Belarus. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 58 taxa of wild food plants used in the 19th century were identified. Some of them are still used in modern Belarus, others are probably completely forgotten. In the 19th century several species of wild greens were widely used for making soups. Apart from Rumex, other wild greens are now either forgotten or rarely used. The list of species used in the 20th and 21st century encompasses 67 taxa. Nearly half of them were mentioned by Rostafiński’s respondents. The list of fruit species has not changed much, although in the 19th century fruits were mainly eaten raw, or with dairy or floury dishes, and now apart from being eaten raw, they are incorporated in sweet dishes like jams or cakes. Modern comparative data also contain several alien species, some of which have escaped from cultivation and are gathered from a semi-wild state, as well as children's snacks, which were probably collected in the 19th century but were not recorded back then. CONCLUSION: The responses to Rostafiński from 1883 present extremely valuable historical material as the use of wild food plants in Belarus has since undergone drastic changes, similar to those, which have taken place in other Eastern European countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3627636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36276362013-04-18 Wild edible plants of Belarus: from Rostafiński’s questionnaire of 1883 to the present Łuczaj, Łukasz Köhler, Piotr Pirożnikow, Ewa Graniszewska, Maja Pieroni, Andrea Gervasi, Tanya J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Research BACKGROUND: Belarus is an Eastern European country, which has been little studied ethnobotanically. The aim of the study was to compare largely unpublished 19th century sources with more contemporary data on the use of wild food plants. METHODS: The information on 19th century uses is based on twelve, mainly unpublished, responses to Józef Rostafiński’s questionnaire from 1883, and the newly discovered materials of the ethnographer Michał Federowski, who structured his data according to Rostafiński’s questionnaire and documented it with voucher specimens. Rostafiński’s questionnaire was concerned mainly with Polish territories, but for historical reasons this also encompassed a large part of Belarus, and we analyzed only the twelve responses (out of the few hundred Rostafiński obtained), which concerned the present Belarus. These data were compared with a few 20th century ethnographic sources, and our own 40 interviews and questionnaires from Belarus. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 58 taxa of wild food plants used in the 19th century were identified. Some of them are still used in modern Belarus, others are probably completely forgotten. In the 19th century several species of wild greens were widely used for making soups. Apart from Rumex, other wild greens are now either forgotten or rarely used. The list of species used in the 20th and 21st century encompasses 67 taxa. Nearly half of them were mentioned by Rostafiński’s respondents. The list of fruit species has not changed much, although in the 19th century fruits were mainly eaten raw, or with dairy or floury dishes, and now apart from being eaten raw, they are incorporated in sweet dishes like jams or cakes. Modern comparative data also contain several alien species, some of which have escaped from cultivation and are gathered from a semi-wild state, as well as children's snacks, which were probably collected in the 19th century but were not recorded back then. CONCLUSION: The responses to Rostafiński from 1883 present extremely valuable historical material as the use of wild food plants in Belarus has since undergone drastic changes, similar to those, which have taken place in other Eastern European countries. BioMed Central 2013-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3627636/ /pubmed/23557012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-9-21 Text en Copyright © 2013 Łuczaj et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Łuczaj, Łukasz
Köhler, Piotr
Pirożnikow, Ewa
Graniszewska, Maja
Pieroni, Andrea
Gervasi, Tanya
Wild edible plants of Belarus: from Rostafiński’s questionnaire of 1883 to the present
title Wild edible plants of Belarus: from Rostafiński’s questionnaire of 1883 to the present
title_full Wild edible plants of Belarus: from Rostafiński’s questionnaire of 1883 to the present
title_fullStr Wild edible plants of Belarus: from Rostafiński’s questionnaire of 1883 to the present
title_full_unstemmed Wild edible plants of Belarus: from Rostafiński’s questionnaire of 1883 to the present
title_short Wild edible plants of Belarus: from Rostafiński’s questionnaire of 1883 to the present
title_sort wild edible plants of belarus: from rostafiński’s questionnaire of 1883 to the present
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23557012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-9-21
work_keys_str_mv AT łuczajłukasz wildedibleplantsofbelarusfromrostafinskisquestionnaireof1883tothepresent
AT kohlerpiotr wildedibleplantsofbelarusfromrostafinskisquestionnaireof1883tothepresent
AT piroznikowewa wildedibleplantsofbelarusfromrostafinskisquestionnaireof1883tothepresent
AT graniszewskamaja wildedibleplantsofbelarusfromrostafinskisquestionnaireof1883tothepresent
AT pieroniandrea wildedibleplantsofbelarusfromrostafinskisquestionnaireof1883tothepresent
AT gervasitanya wildedibleplantsofbelarusfromrostafinskisquestionnaireof1883tothepresent