Cargando…

Extracorporeal versus peritoneal ultrafiltration in diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure – a review

Diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure in the form of type 2 cardiorenal syndrome is a problem of growing significance in everyday clinical practice because of high morbidity and mortality. There has been scant progress in the treatment of overhydration, the main cause of symptoms in this group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wańkowicz, Zofia, Próchnicka, Agnieszka, Olszowska, Anna, Baczyński, Daniel, Krzesiński, Paweł, Dziuk, Mirosław
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3628132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22129914
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.882118
_version_ 1782266382234157056
author Wańkowicz, Zofia
Próchnicka, Agnieszka
Olszowska, Anna
Baczyński, Daniel
Krzesiński, Paweł
Dziuk, Mirosław
author_facet Wańkowicz, Zofia
Próchnicka, Agnieszka
Olszowska, Anna
Baczyński, Daniel
Krzesiński, Paweł
Dziuk, Mirosław
author_sort Wańkowicz, Zofia
collection PubMed
description Diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure in the form of type 2 cardiorenal syndrome is a problem of growing significance in everyday clinical practice because of high morbidity and mortality. There has been scant progress in the treatment of overhydration, the main cause of symptoms in this group of patients. The aim of our review is to present recent advances in the ultrafiltration therapy of congestive heart failure, with special attention to the new dedicated device for extracorporeal isolated ultrafiltration, as well as modifications of peritoneal dialysis in the form of peritoneal ultrafiltration with icodextrin solution and incremental peritoneal dialysis. Technical and clinical features, costs and potential risks of available devices for isolated ultrafiltration are presented. This method should be reserved for patients with true diuretic resistance as part of a more complex strategy aiming at the adequate control of fluid retention. Peritoneal ultrafiltration is presented as a viable alternative to extracorporeal ultrafiltration because of medical and psychosocial benefits of home-based therapy, lower costs and more effective daily ultrafiltration. In conclusion, large, properly randomized and controlled clinical trials with long-term follow-up will be essential in assessing the logistics and cost-effectiveness of both methods. Most importantly, however, they should be able to evaluate the impact of both methods on preservation of renal function and delaying the progression of heart failure by interrupting the vicious circle of cardiorenal syndrome. Our review is supplemented with the case report of the use of peritoneal ultrafiltration with a single 12-hour nighttime icodextrin exchange as a life-saving procedure in a patient with congestive heart failure resistant to pharmacological treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3628132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36281322013-04-24 Extracorporeal versus peritoneal ultrafiltration in diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure – a review Wańkowicz, Zofia Próchnicka, Agnieszka Olszowska, Anna Baczyński, Daniel Krzesiński, Paweł Dziuk, Mirosław Med Sci Monit Review Article Diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure in the form of type 2 cardiorenal syndrome is a problem of growing significance in everyday clinical practice because of high morbidity and mortality. There has been scant progress in the treatment of overhydration, the main cause of symptoms in this group of patients. The aim of our review is to present recent advances in the ultrafiltration therapy of congestive heart failure, with special attention to the new dedicated device for extracorporeal isolated ultrafiltration, as well as modifications of peritoneal dialysis in the form of peritoneal ultrafiltration with icodextrin solution and incremental peritoneal dialysis. Technical and clinical features, costs and potential risks of available devices for isolated ultrafiltration are presented. This method should be reserved for patients with true diuretic resistance as part of a more complex strategy aiming at the adequate control of fluid retention. Peritoneal ultrafiltration is presented as a viable alternative to extracorporeal ultrafiltration because of medical and psychosocial benefits of home-based therapy, lower costs and more effective daily ultrafiltration. In conclusion, large, properly randomized and controlled clinical trials with long-term follow-up will be essential in assessing the logistics and cost-effectiveness of both methods. Most importantly, however, they should be able to evaluate the impact of both methods on preservation of renal function and delaying the progression of heart failure by interrupting the vicious circle of cardiorenal syndrome. Our review is supplemented with the case report of the use of peritoneal ultrafiltration with a single 12-hour nighttime icodextrin exchange as a life-saving procedure in a patient with congestive heart failure resistant to pharmacological treatment. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2011-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3628132/ /pubmed/22129914 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.882118 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2011 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
spellingShingle Review Article
Wańkowicz, Zofia
Próchnicka, Agnieszka
Olszowska, Anna
Baczyński, Daniel
Krzesiński, Paweł
Dziuk, Mirosław
Extracorporeal versus peritoneal ultrafiltration in diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure – a review
title Extracorporeal versus peritoneal ultrafiltration in diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure – a review
title_full Extracorporeal versus peritoneal ultrafiltration in diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure – a review
title_fullStr Extracorporeal versus peritoneal ultrafiltration in diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure – a review
title_full_unstemmed Extracorporeal versus peritoneal ultrafiltration in diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure – a review
title_short Extracorporeal versus peritoneal ultrafiltration in diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure – a review
title_sort extracorporeal versus peritoneal ultrafiltration in diuretic-resistant congestive heart failure – a review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3628132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22129914
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.882118
work_keys_str_mv AT wankowiczzofia extracorporealversusperitonealultrafiltrationindiureticresistantcongestiveheartfailureareview
AT prochnickaagnieszka extracorporealversusperitonealultrafiltrationindiureticresistantcongestiveheartfailureareview
AT olszowskaanna extracorporealversusperitonealultrafiltrationindiureticresistantcongestiveheartfailureareview
AT baczynskidaniel extracorporealversusperitonealultrafiltrationindiureticresistantcongestiveheartfailureareview
AT krzesinskipaweł extracorporealversusperitonealultrafiltrationindiureticresistantcongestiveheartfailureareview
AT dziukmirosław extracorporealversusperitonealultrafiltrationindiureticresistantcongestiveheartfailureareview