Cargando…
Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review
Introduction. Reduction of preterm birth is a major goal in obstetric care. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on the effectiveness of the cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth. Methods. We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE and Embase f...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3628502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23606848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/576723 |
_version_ | 1782266434216263680 |
---|---|
author | Liem, Sophie M. S. van Pampus, Mariëlle G. Mol, Ben Willem J. Bekedam, Dick J. |
author_facet | Liem, Sophie M. S. van Pampus, Mariëlle G. Mol, Ben Willem J. Bekedam, Dick J. |
author_sort | Liem, Sophie M. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. Reduction of preterm birth is a major goal in obstetric care. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on the effectiveness of the cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth. Methods. We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE and Embase from inception until April 2012 to identify studies investigating treatment with a cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth. We constructed two-by-two tables for delivery before 28, 34, and 37 weeks of gestation and calculated relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results. The search revealed 103 potentially eligible abstracts of which six cohort studies and four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the effectiveness of the pessary. One RCT (n = 380) demonstrated a lower delivery rate prior to 34 weeks (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.13–0.43) in the pessary group, while another RCT (n = 108) showed no positive effect of pessary for delivery before 34 weeks (RR 1.73; 95% CI 0.43–6.88). Two older quasi randomized studies and cohort studies indicated potential effect of the pessary. Conclusions. Available randomized and nonrandomized studies indicate potential effectiveness of a cervical pessary in the prevention of preterm birth. More randomized clinical trials are needed before this device can be used in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3628502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36285022013-04-19 Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review Liem, Sophie M. S. van Pampus, Mariëlle G. Mol, Ben Willem J. Bekedam, Dick J. Obstet Gynecol Int Review Article Introduction. Reduction of preterm birth is a major goal in obstetric care. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on the effectiveness of the cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth. Methods. We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE and Embase from inception until April 2012 to identify studies investigating treatment with a cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth. We constructed two-by-two tables for delivery before 28, 34, and 37 weeks of gestation and calculated relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results. The search revealed 103 potentially eligible abstracts of which six cohort studies and four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the effectiveness of the pessary. One RCT (n = 380) demonstrated a lower delivery rate prior to 34 weeks (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.13–0.43) in the pessary group, while another RCT (n = 108) showed no positive effect of pessary for delivery before 34 weeks (RR 1.73; 95% CI 0.43–6.88). Two older quasi randomized studies and cohort studies indicated potential effect of the pessary. Conclusions. Available randomized and nonrandomized studies indicate potential effectiveness of a cervical pessary in the prevention of preterm birth. More randomized clinical trials are needed before this device can be used in clinical practice. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3628502/ /pubmed/23606848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/576723 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sophie M. S. Liem et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Liem, Sophie M. S. van Pampus, Mariëlle G. Mol, Ben Willem J. Bekedam, Dick J. Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review |
title | Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | cervical pessaries for the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3628502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23606848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/576723 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liemsophiems cervicalpessariesforthepreventionofpretermbirthasystematicreview AT vanpampusmarielleg cervicalpessariesforthepreventionofpretermbirthasystematicreview AT molbenwillemj cervicalpessariesforthepreventionofpretermbirthasystematicreview AT bekedamdickj cervicalpessariesforthepreventionofpretermbirthasystematicreview |