Cargando…

Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review

Introduction. Reduction of preterm birth is a major goal in obstetric care. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on the effectiveness of the cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth. Methods. We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE and Embase f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liem, Sophie M. S., van Pampus, Mariëlle G., Mol, Ben Willem J., Bekedam, Dick J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3628502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23606848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/576723
_version_ 1782266434216263680
author Liem, Sophie M. S.
van Pampus, Mariëlle G.
Mol, Ben Willem J.
Bekedam, Dick J.
author_facet Liem, Sophie M. S.
van Pampus, Mariëlle G.
Mol, Ben Willem J.
Bekedam, Dick J.
author_sort Liem, Sophie M. S.
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Reduction of preterm birth is a major goal in obstetric care. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on the effectiveness of the cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth. Methods. We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE and Embase from inception until April 2012 to identify studies investigating treatment with a cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth. We constructed two-by-two tables for delivery before 28, 34, and 37 weeks of gestation and calculated relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results. The search revealed 103 potentially eligible abstracts of which six cohort studies and four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the effectiveness of the pessary. One RCT (n = 380) demonstrated a lower delivery rate prior to 34 weeks (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.13–0.43) in the pessary group, while another RCT (n = 108) showed no positive effect of pessary for delivery before 34 weeks (RR 1.73; 95% CI 0.43–6.88). Two older quasi randomized studies and cohort studies indicated potential effect of the pessary. Conclusions. Available randomized and nonrandomized studies indicate potential effectiveness of a cervical pessary in the prevention of preterm birth. More randomized clinical trials are needed before this device can be used in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3628502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36285022013-04-19 Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review Liem, Sophie M. S. van Pampus, Mariëlle G. Mol, Ben Willem J. Bekedam, Dick J. Obstet Gynecol Int Review Article Introduction. Reduction of preterm birth is a major goal in obstetric care. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on the effectiveness of the cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth. Methods. We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE and Embase from inception until April 2012 to identify studies investigating treatment with a cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth. We constructed two-by-two tables for delivery before 28, 34, and 37 weeks of gestation and calculated relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results. The search revealed 103 potentially eligible abstracts of which six cohort studies and four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the effectiveness of the pessary. One RCT (n = 380) demonstrated a lower delivery rate prior to 34 weeks (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.13–0.43) in the pessary group, while another RCT (n = 108) showed no positive effect of pessary for delivery before 34 weeks (RR 1.73; 95% CI 0.43–6.88). Two older quasi randomized studies and cohort studies indicated potential effect of the pessary. Conclusions. Available randomized and nonrandomized studies indicate potential effectiveness of a cervical pessary in the prevention of preterm birth. More randomized clinical trials are needed before this device can be used in clinical practice. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3628502/ /pubmed/23606848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/576723 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sophie M. S. Liem et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Liem, Sophie M. S.
van Pampus, Mariëlle G.
Mol, Ben Willem J.
Bekedam, Dick J.
Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review
title Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review
title_full Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review
title_short Cervical Pessaries for the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review
title_sort cervical pessaries for the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3628502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23606848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/576723
work_keys_str_mv AT liemsophiems cervicalpessariesforthepreventionofpretermbirthasystematicreview
AT vanpampusmarielleg cervicalpessariesforthepreventionofpretermbirthasystematicreview
AT molbenwillemj cervicalpessariesforthepreventionofpretermbirthasystematicreview
AT bekedamdickj cervicalpessariesforthepreventionofpretermbirthasystematicreview