Cargando…
A Systematic Review of the Screening Accuracy of the HIV Dementia Scale and International HIV Dementia Scale
BACKGROUND: The HIV Dementia Scale (HDS) and International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) are brief tools that have been developed to screen for and aid diagnosis of HIV-associated dementia (HAD). They are increasingly being used in clinical practice for minor neurocognitive disorder (MND) as well as HAD...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3628906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23613945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061826 |
_version_ | 1782266484745043968 |
---|---|
author | Haddow, Lewis John Floyd, Sian Copas, Andrew Gilson, Richard John Cary |
author_facet | Haddow, Lewis John Floyd, Sian Copas, Andrew Gilson, Richard John Cary |
author_sort | Haddow, Lewis John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The HIV Dementia Scale (HDS) and International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) are brief tools that have been developed to screen for and aid diagnosis of HIV-associated dementia (HAD). They are increasingly being used in clinical practice for minor neurocognitive disorder (MND) as well as HAD, despite uncertainty about their accuracy. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A systematic review of the accuracy of the HDS and IHDS was conducted. Studies were assessed on Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy criteria. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (LR) and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were calculated for each scale as a test for HAD or MND. We retrieved 15 studies of the HDS, 10 of the IHDS, and 1 of both scales. Thirteen studies of the HDS were conducted in North America, and 7 of the IHDS studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Estimates of accuracy were highly heterogeneous between studies for the HDS but less so for the IHDS. Pooled DOR for the HDS was 7.52 (95% confidence interval 3.75–15.11), sensitivity and specificity for HAD were estimated at 68.1% and 77.9%, and sensitivity and specificity for MND were estimated at 42.0% and 91.2%. Pooled DOR for the IHDS was 3.49 (2.12–5.73), sensitivity and specificity for HAD were 74.3% and 54.7%, and sensitivity and specificity for MND were 64.3% and 66.0%. CONCLUSION: Both scales were low in accuracy. The literature is limited by the lack of a gold standard, and variation in estimates of accuracy is likely to be due to differences in reference standard. There is a lack of studies comparing both scales, and they have been studied in different populations, but the IHDS may be less specific than the HDS. These rapid tests are not recommended for diagnostic use, and further research is required to inform their use in asymptomatic screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3628906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36289062013-04-23 A Systematic Review of the Screening Accuracy of the HIV Dementia Scale and International HIV Dementia Scale Haddow, Lewis John Floyd, Sian Copas, Andrew Gilson, Richard John Cary PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The HIV Dementia Scale (HDS) and International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) are brief tools that have been developed to screen for and aid diagnosis of HIV-associated dementia (HAD). They are increasingly being used in clinical practice for minor neurocognitive disorder (MND) as well as HAD, despite uncertainty about their accuracy. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A systematic review of the accuracy of the HDS and IHDS was conducted. Studies were assessed on Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy criteria. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (LR) and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were calculated for each scale as a test for HAD or MND. We retrieved 15 studies of the HDS, 10 of the IHDS, and 1 of both scales. Thirteen studies of the HDS were conducted in North America, and 7 of the IHDS studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Estimates of accuracy were highly heterogeneous between studies for the HDS but less so for the IHDS. Pooled DOR for the HDS was 7.52 (95% confidence interval 3.75–15.11), sensitivity and specificity for HAD were estimated at 68.1% and 77.9%, and sensitivity and specificity for MND were estimated at 42.0% and 91.2%. Pooled DOR for the IHDS was 3.49 (2.12–5.73), sensitivity and specificity for HAD were 74.3% and 54.7%, and sensitivity and specificity for MND were 64.3% and 66.0%. CONCLUSION: Both scales were low in accuracy. The literature is limited by the lack of a gold standard, and variation in estimates of accuracy is likely to be due to differences in reference standard. There is a lack of studies comparing both scales, and they have been studied in different populations, but the IHDS may be less specific than the HDS. These rapid tests are not recommended for diagnostic use, and further research is required to inform their use in asymptomatic screening. Public Library of Science 2013-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3628906/ /pubmed/23613945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061826 Text en © 2013 Haddow et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Haddow, Lewis John Floyd, Sian Copas, Andrew Gilson, Richard John Cary A Systematic Review of the Screening Accuracy of the HIV Dementia Scale and International HIV Dementia Scale |
title | A Systematic Review of the Screening Accuracy of the HIV Dementia Scale and International HIV Dementia Scale |
title_full | A Systematic Review of the Screening Accuracy of the HIV Dementia Scale and International HIV Dementia Scale |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of the Screening Accuracy of the HIV Dementia Scale and International HIV Dementia Scale |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of the Screening Accuracy of the HIV Dementia Scale and International HIV Dementia Scale |
title_short | A Systematic Review of the Screening Accuracy of the HIV Dementia Scale and International HIV Dementia Scale |
title_sort | systematic review of the screening accuracy of the hiv dementia scale and international hiv dementia scale |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3628906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23613945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061826 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haddowlewisjohn asystematicreviewofthescreeningaccuracyofthehivdementiascaleandinternationalhivdementiascale AT floydsian asystematicreviewofthescreeningaccuracyofthehivdementiascaleandinternationalhivdementiascale AT copasandrew asystematicreviewofthescreeningaccuracyofthehivdementiascaleandinternationalhivdementiascale AT gilsonrichardjohncary asystematicreviewofthescreeningaccuracyofthehivdementiascaleandinternationalhivdementiascale AT haddowlewisjohn systematicreviewofthescreeningaccuracyofthehivdementiascaleandinternationalhivdementiascale AT floydsian systematicreviewofthescreeningaccuracyofthehivdementiascaleandinternationalhivdementiascale AT copasandrew systematicreviewofthescreeningaccuracyofthehivdementiascaleandinternationalhivdementiascale AT gilsonrichardjohncary systematicreviewofthescreeningaccuracyofthehivdementiascaleandinternationalhivdementiascale |