Cargando…

Perceptual elements in Penn & Teller’s “Cups and Balls” magic trick

Magic illusions provide the perceptual and cognitive scientist with a toolbox of experimental manipulations and testable hypotheses about the building blocks of conscious experience. Here we studied several sleight-of-hand manipulations in the performance of the classic “Cups and Balls” magic trick...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rieiro, Hector, Martinez-Conde, Susana, Macknik, Stephen L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3628988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638353
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19
_version_ 1782266495138529280
author Rieiro, Hector
Martinez-Conde, Susana
Macknik, Stephen L.
author_facet Rieiro, Hector
Martinez-Conde, Susana
Macknik, Stephen L.
author_sort Rieiro, Hector
collection PubMed
description Magic illusions provide the perceptual and cognitive scientist with a toolbox of experimental manipulations and testable hypotheses about the building blocks of conscious experience. Here we studied several sleight-of-hand manipulations in the performance of the classic “Cups and Balls” magic trick (where balls appear and disappear inside upside-down opaque cups). We examined a version inspired by the entertainment duo Penn & Teller, conducted with three opaque and subsequently with three transparent cups. Magician Teller used his right hand to load (i.e. introduce surreptitiously) a small ball inside each of two upside-down cups, one at a time, while using his left hand to remove a different ball from the upside-down bottom of the cup. The sleight at the third cup involved one of six manipulations: (a) standard maneuver, (b) standard maneuver without a third ball, (c) ball placed on the table, (d) ball lifted, (e) ball dropped to the floor, and (f) ball stuck to the cup. Seven subjects watched the videos of the performances while reporting, via button press, whenever balls were removed from the cups/table (button “1”) or placed inside the cups/on the table (button “2”). Subjects’ perception was more accurate with transparent than with opaque cups. Perceptual performance was worse for the conditions where the ball was placed on the table, or stuck to the cup, than for the standard maneuver. The condition in which the ball was lifted displaced the subjects’ gaze position the most, whereas the condition in which there was no ball caused the smallest gaze displacement. Training improved the subjects’ perceptual performance. Occlusion of the magician’s face did not affect the subjects’ perception, suggesting that gaze misdirection does not play a strong role in the Cups and Balls illusion. Our results have implications for how to optimize the performance of this classic magic trick, and for the types of hand and object motion that maximize magic misdirection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3628988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36289882013-05-01 Perceptual elements in Penn & Teller’s “Cups and Balls” magic trick Rieiro, Hector Martinez-Conde, Susana Macknik, Stephen L. Peerj Neuroscience Magic illusions provide the perceptual and cognitive scientist with a toolbox of experimental manipulations and testable hypotheses about the building blocks of conscious experience. Here we studied several sleight-of-hand manipulations in the performance of the classic “Cups and Balls” magic trick (where balls appear and disappear inside upside-down opaque cups). We examined a version inspired by the entertainment duo Penn & Teller, conducted with three opaque and subsequently with three transparent cups. Magician Teller used his right hand to load (i.e. introduce surreptitiously) a small ball inside each of two upside-down cups, one at a time, while using his left hand to remove a different ball from the upside-down bottom of the cup. The sleight at the third cup involved one of six manipulations: (a) standard maneuver, (b) standard maneuver without a third ball, (c) ball placed on the table, (d) ball lifted, (e) ball dropped to the floor, and (f) ball stuck to the cup. Seven subjects watched the videos of the performances while reporting, via button press, whenever balls were removed from the cups/table (button “1”) or placed inside the cups/on the table (button “2”). Subjects’ perception was more accurate with transparent than with opaque cups. Perceptual performance was worse for the conditions where the ball was placed on the table, or stuck to the cup, than for the standard maneuver. The condition in which the ball was lifted displaced the subjects’ gaze position the most, whereas the condition in which there was no ball caused the smallest gaze displacement. Training improved the subjects’ perceptual performance. Occlusion of the magician’s face did not affect the subjects’ perception, suggesting that gaze misdirection does not play a strong role in the Cups and Balls illusion. Our results have implications for how to optimize the performance of this classic magic trick, and for the types of hand and object motion that maximize magic misdirection. PeerJ Inc. 2013-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3628988/ /pubmed/23638353 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19 Text en © 2013 Rieiro et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Rieiro, Hector
Martinez-Conde, Susana
Macknik, Stephen L.
Perceptual elements in Penn & Teller’s “Cups and Balls” magic trick
title Perceptual elements in Penn & Teller’s “Cups and Balls” magic trick
title_full Perceptual elements in Penn & Teller’s “Cups and Balls” magic trick
title_fullStr Perceptual elements in Penn & Teller’s “Cups and Balls” magic trick
title_full_unstemmed Perceptual elements in Penn & Teller’s “Cups and Balls” magic trick
title_short Perceptual elements in Penn & Teller’s “Cups and Balls” magic trick
title_sort perceptual elements in penn & teller’s “cups and balls” magic trick
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3628988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638353
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19
work_keys_str_mv AT rieirohector perceptualelementsinpenntellerscupsandballsmagictrick
AT martinezcondesusana perceptualelementsinpenntellerscupsandballsmagictrick
AT macknikstephenl perceptualelementsinpenntellerscupsandballsmagictrick