Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of Rega 8: An Updated Genotypic Interpretation System That Significantly Predicts HIV-Therapy Response

INTRODUCTION: Clinically evaluating genotypic interpretation systems is essential to provide optimal guidance in designing potent individualized HIV-regimens. This study aimed at investigating the ability of the latest Rega algorithm to predict virological response on a short and longer period. MATE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vercauteren, Jurgen, Beheydt, Gertjan, Prosperi, Mattia, Libin, Pieter, Imbrechts, Stijn, Camacho, Ricardo, Clotet, Bonaventura, De Luca, Andrea, Grossman, Zehava, Kaiser, Rolf, Sönnerborg, Anders, Torti, Carlo, Van Wijngaerden, Eric, Schmit, Jean-Claude, Zazzi, Maurizio, Geretti, Anna-Maria, Vandamme, Anne-Mieke, Van Laethem, Kristel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23613852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061436
_version_ 1782266536763850752
author Vercauteren, Jurgen
Beheydt, Gertjan
Prosperi, Mattia
Libin, Pieter
Imbrechts, Stijn
Camacho, Ricardo
Clotet, Bonaventura
De Luca, Andrea
Grossman, Zehava
Kaiser, Rolf
Sönnerborg, Anders
Torti, Carlo
Van Wijngaerden, Eric
Schmit, Jean-Claude
Zazzi, Maurizio
Geretti, Anna-Maria
Vandamme, Anne-Mieke
Van Laethem, Kristel
author_facet Vercauteren, Jurgen
Beheydt, Gertjan
Prosperi, Mattia
Libin, Pieter
Imbrechts, Stijn
Camacho, Ricardo
Clotet, Bonaventura
De Luca, Andrea
Grossman, Zehava
Kaiser, Rolf
Sönnerborg, Anders
Torti, Carlo
Van Wijngaerden, Eric
Schmit, Jean-Claude
Zazzi, Maurizio
Geretti, Anna-Maria
Vandamme, Anne-Mieke
Van Laethem, Kristel
author_sort Vercauteren, Jurgen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clinically evaluating genotypic interpretation systems is essential to provide optimal guidance in designing potent individualized HIV-regimens. This study aimed at investigating the ability of the latest Rega algorithm to predict virological response on a short and longer period. MATERIALS & METHODS: 9231 treatment changes episodes were extracted from an integrated patient database. The virological response after 8, 24 and 48 weeks was dichotomized to success and failure. Success was defined as a viral load below 50 copies/ml or alternatively, a 2 log decrease from the baseline viral load at 8 weeks. The predictive ability of Rega version 8 was analysed in comparison with that of previous evaluated version Rega 5 and two other algorithms (ANRS v2011.05 and Stanford HIVdb v6.0.11). A logistic model based on the genotypic susceptibility score was used to predict virological response, and additionally, confounding factors were added to the model. Performance of the models was compared using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Per unit increase of the GSS reported by Rega 8, the odds on having a successful therapy response on week 8 increased significantly by 81% (OR = 1.81, CI = [1.76–1.86]), on week 24 by 73% (OR = 1.73, CI = [1.69–1.78]) and on week 48 by 85% (OR = 1.85, CI = [1.80–1.91]). No significant differences in AUC were found between the performance of Rega 8 and Rega 5, ANRS v2011.05 and Stanford HIVdb v6.0.11, however Rega 8 had the highest sensitivity: 76.9%, 76.5% and 77.2% on 8, 24 and 48 weeks respectively. Inclusion of additional factors increased the performance significantly. CONCLUSION: Rega 8 is a significant predictor for virological response with a better sensitivity than previously, and with rules for recently approved drugs. Additional variables should be taken into account to ensure an effective regimen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3629176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36291762013-04-23 Clinical Evaluation of Rega 8: An Updated Genotypic Interpretation System That Significantly Predicts HIV-Therapy Response Vercauteren, Jurgen Beheydt, Gertjan Prosperi, Mattia Libin, Pieter Imbrechts, Stijn Camacho, Ricardo Clotet, Bonaventura De Luca, Andrea Grossman, Zehava Kaiser, Rolf Sönnerborg, Anders Torti, Carlo Van Wijngaerden, Eric Schmit, Jean-Claude Zazzi, Maurizio Geretti, Anna-Maria Vandamme, Anne-Mieke Van Laethem, Kristel PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Clinically evaluating genotypic interpretation systems is essential to provide optimal guidance in designing potent individualized HIV-regimens. This study aimed at investigating the ability of the latest Rega algorithm to predict virological response on a short and longer period. MATERIALS & METHODS: 9231 treatment changes episodes were extracted from an integrated patient database. The virological response after 8, 24 and 48 weeks was dichotomized to success and failure. Success was defined as a viral load below 50 copies/ml or alternatively, a 2 log decrease from the baseline viral load at 8 weeks. The predictive ability of Rega version 8 was analysed in comparison with that of previous evaluated version Rega 5 and two other algorithms (ANRS v2011.05 and Stanford HIVdb v6.0.11). A logistic model based on the genotypic susceptibility score was used to predict virological response, and additionally, confounding factors were added to the model. Performance of the models was compared using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Per unit increase of the GSS reported by Rega 8, the odds on having a successful therapy response on week 8 increased significantly by 81% (OR = 1.81, CI = [1.76–1.86]), on week 24 by 73% (OR = 1.73, CI = [1.69–1.78]) and on week 48 by 85% (OR = 1.85, CI = [1.80–1.91]). No significant differences in AUC were found between the performance of Rega 8 and Rega 5, ANRS v2011.05 and Stanford HIVdb v6.0.11, however Rega 8 had the highest sensitivity: 76.9%, 76.5% and 77.2% on 8, 24 and 48 weeks respectively. Inclusion of additional factors increased the performance significantly. CONCLUSION: Rega 8 is a significant predictor for virological response with a better sensitivity than previously, and with rules for recently approved drugs. Additional variables should be taken into account to ensure an effective regimen. Public Library of Science 2013-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3629176/ /pubmed/23613852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061436 Text en © 2013 Vercauteren et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vercauteren, Jurgen
Beheydt, Gertjan
Prosperi, Mattia
Libin, Pieter
Imbrechts, Stijn
Camacho, Ricardo
Clotet, Bonaventura
De Luca, Andrea
Grossman, Zehava
Kaiser, Rolf
Sönnerborg, Anders
Torti, Carlo
Van Wijngaerden, Eric
Schmit, Jean-Claude
Zazzi, Maurizio
Geretti, Anna-Maria
Vandamme, Anne-Mieke
Van Laethem, Kristel
Clinical Evaluation of Rega 8: An Updated Genotypic Interpretation System That Significantly Predicts HIV-Therapy Response
title Clinical Evaluation of Rega 8: An Updated Genotypic Interpretation System That Significantly Predicts HIV-Therapy Response
title_full Clinical Evaluation of Rega 8: An Updated Genotypic Interpretation System That Significantly Predicts HIV-Therapy Response
title_fullStr Clinical Evaluation of Rega 8: An Updated Genotypic Interpretation System That Significantly Predicts HIV-Therapy Response
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Evaluation of Rega 8: An Updated Genotypic Interpretation System That Significantly Predicts HIV-Therapy Response
title_short Clinical Evaluation of Rega 8: An Updated Genotypic Interpretation System That Significantly Predicts HIV-Therapy Response
title_sort clinical evaluation of rega 8: an updated genotypic interpretation system that significantly predicts hiv-therapy response
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23613852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061436
work_keys_str_mv AT vercauterenjurgen clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT beheydtgertjan clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT prosperimattia clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT libinpieter clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT imbrechtsstijn clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT camachoricardo clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT clotetbonaventura clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT delucaandrea clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT grossmanzehava clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT kaiserrolf clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT sonnerborganders clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT torticarlo clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT vanwijngaerdeneric clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT schmitjeanclaude clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT zazzimaurizio clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT gerettiannamaria clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT vandammeannemieke clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse
AT vanlaethemkristel clinicalevaluationofrega8anupdatedgenotypicinterpretationsystemthatsignificantlypredictshivtherapyresponse