Cargando…

The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room

BACKGROUND: Medical doctors who perform C-arm fluoroscopy-guided procedures are exposed to X-ray radiation. Therefore, radiation-protective shields are recommended to protect these doctors from radiation. For the past several years, these protective shields have sometimes been used without regular i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryu, Jae Sung, Baek, Seung Woo, Jung, Cheol Hee, Cho, Suk Ju, Jung, Eu Gene, Kim, Hae Kyoung, Kim, Jae Hun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Pain Society 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23614075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.2.142
_version_ 1782266568809381888
author Ryu, Jae Sung
Baek, Seung Woo
Jung, Cheol Hee
Cho, Suk Ju
Jung, Eu Gene
Kim, Hae Kyoung
Kim, Jae Hun
author_facet Ryu, Jae Sung
Baek, Seung Woo
Jung, Cheol Hee
Cho, Suk Ju
Jung, Eu Gene
Kim, Hae Kyoung
Kim, Jae Hun
author_sort Ryu, Jae Sung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical doctors who perform C-arm fluoroscopy-guided procedures are exposed to X-ray radiation. Therefore, radiation-protective shields are recommended to protect these doctors from radiation. For the past several years, these protective shields have sometimes been used without regular inspection. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of damage to radiation-protective shields in the operating room. METHODS: This study investigated 98 radiation-protective shields in the operation rooms of Konkuk University Medical Center and Jeju National University Hospital. We examined whether these shields were damaged or not with the unaided eye and by fluoroscopy. RESULTS: There were seventy-one aprons and twenty-seven thyroid protectors in the two university hospitals. Fourteen aprons (19.7%) were damaged, whereas no thyroid protectors (0%) were. Of the twenty-six aprons, which have been used since 2005, eleven (42.3%) were damaged. Of the ten aprons, which have been used since 2008, none (0%) was damaged. Of the twenty-three aprons that have been used since 2009, two (8.7%) of them were damaged. Of the eight aprons used since 2010, one (12.3%) was damaged. Of the four aprons used since 2011, none (0%) of them were damaged. The most common site of damage to the radiation-protective shields was at the waist of the aprons (51%). CONCLUSIONS: As a result, aprons that have been used for a long period of time can have a higher risk of damage. Radiation-protective shields should be inspected regularly and exchanged for new products for the safety of medical workers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3629340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Pain Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36293402013-04-23 The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room Ryu, Jae Sung Baek, Seung Woo Jung, Cheol Hee Cho, Suk Ju Jung, Eu Gene Kim, Hae Kyoung Kim, Jae Hun Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: Medical doctors who perform C-arm fluoroscopy-guided procedures are exposed to X-ray radiation. Therefore, radiation-protective shields are recommended to protect these doctors from radiation. For the past several years, these protective shields have sometimes been used without regular inspection. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of damage to radiation-protective shields in the operating room. METHODS: This study investigated 98 radiation-protective shields in the operation rooms of Konkuk University Medical Center and Jeju National University Hospital. We examined whether these shields were damaged or not with the unaided eye and by fluoroscopy. RESULTS: There were seventy-one aprons and twenty-seven thyroid protectors in the two university hospitals. Fourteen aprons (19.7%) were damaged, whereas no thyroid protectors (0%) were. Of the twenty-six aprons, which have been used since 2005, eleven (42.3%) were damaged. Of the ten aprons, which have been used since 2008, none (0%) was damaged. Of the twenty-three aprons that have been used since 2009, two (8.7%) of them were damaged. Of the eight aprons used since 2010, one (12.3%) was damaged. Of the four aprons used since 2011, none (0%) of them were damaged. The most common site of damage to the radiation-protective shields was at the waist of the aprons (51%). CONCLUSIONS: As a result, aprons that have been used for a long period of time can have a higher risk of damage. Radiation-protective shields should be inspected regularly and exchanged for new products for the safety of medical workers. The Korean Pain Society 2013-04 2013-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3629340/ /pubmed/23614075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.2.142 Text en Copyright © The Korean Pain Society, 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ryu, Jae Sung
Baek, Seung Woo
Jung, Cheol Hee
Cho, Suk Ju
Jung, Eu Gene
Kim, Hae Kyoung
Kim, Jae Hun
The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room
title The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room
title_full The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room
title_fullStr The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room
title_full_unstemmed The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room
title_short The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room
title_sort survey about the degree of damage of radiation-protective shields in operation room
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23614075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.2.142
work_keys_str_mv AT ryujaesung thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT baekseungwoo thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT jungcheolhee thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT chosukju thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT jungeugene thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT kimhaekyoung thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT kimjaehun thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT ryujaesung surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT baekseungwoo surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT jungcheolhee surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT chosukju surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT jungeugene surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT kimhaekyoung surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom
AT kimjaehun surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom