Cargando…
The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room
BACKGROUND: Medical doctors who perform C-arm fluoroscopy-guided procedures are exposed to X-ray radiation. Therefore, radiation-protective shields are recommended to protect these doctors from radiation. For the past several years, these protective shields have sometimes been used without regular i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Pain Society
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23614075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.2.142 |
_version_ | 1782266568809381888 |
---|---|
author | Ryu, Jae Sung Baek, Seung Woo Jung, Cheol Hee Cho, Suk Ju Jung, Eu Gene Kim, Hae Kyoung Kim, Jae Hun |
author_facet | Ryu, Jae Sung Baek, Seung Woo Jung, Cheol Hee Cho, Suk Ju Jung, Eu Gene Kim, Hae Kyoung Kim, Jae Hun |
author_sort | Ryu, Jae Sung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medical doctors who perform C-arm fluoroscopy-guided procedures are exposed to X-ray radiation. Therefore, radiation-protective shields are recommended to protect these doctors from radiation. For the past several years, these protective shields have sometimes been used without regular inspection. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of damage to radiation-protective shields in the operating room. METHODS: This study investigated 98 radiation-protective shields in the operation rooms of Konkuk University Medical Center and Jeju National University Hospital. We examined whether these shields were damaged or not with the unaided eye and by fluoroscopy. RESULTS: There were seventy-one aprons and twenty-seven thyroid protectors in the two university hospitals. Fourteen aprons (19.7%) were damaged, whereas no thyroid protectors (0%) were. Of the twenty-six aprons, which have been used since 2005, eleven (42.3%) were damaged. Of the ten aprons, which have been used since 2008, none (0%) was damaged. Of the twenty-three aprons that have been used since 2009, two (8.7%) of them were damaged. Of the eight aprons used since 2010, one (12.3%) was damaged. Of the four aprons used since 2011, none (0%) of them were damaged. The most common site of damage to the radiation-protective shields was at the waist of the aprons (51%). CONCLUSIONS: As a result, aprons that have been used for a long period of time can have a higher risk of damage. Radiation-protective shields should be inspected regularly and exchanged for new products for the safety of medical workers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3629340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | The Korean Pain Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36293402013-04-23 The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room Ryu, Jae Sung Baek, Seung Woo Jung, Cheol Hee Cho, Suk Ju Jung, Eu Gene Kim, Hae Kyoung Kim, Jae Hun Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: Medical doctors who perform C-arm fluoroscopy-guided procedures are exposed to X-ray radiation. Therefore, radiation-protective shields are recommended to protect these doctors from radiation. For the past several years, these protective shields have sometimes been used without regular inspection. The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of damage to radiation-protective shields in the operating room. METHODS: This study investigated 98 radiation-protective shields in the operation rooms of Konkuk University Medical Center and Jeju National University Hospital. We examined whether these shields were damaged or not with the unaided eye and by fluoroscopy. RESULTS: There were seventy-one aprons and twenty-seven thyroid protectors in the two university hospitals. Fourteen aprons (19.7%) were damaged, whereas no thyroid protectors (0%) were. Of the twenty-six aprons, which have been used since 2005, eleven (42.3%) were damaged. Of the ten aprons, which have been used since 2008, none (0%) was damaged. Of the twenty-three aprons that have been used since 2009, two (8.7%) of them were damaged. Of the eight aprons used since 2010, one (12.3%) was damaged. Of the four aprons used since 2011, none (0%) of them were damaged. The most common site of damage to the radiation-protective shields was at the waist of the aprons (51%). CONCLUSIONS: As a result, aprons that have been used for a long period of time can have a higher risk of damage. Radiation-protective shields should be inspected regularly and exchanged for new products for the safety of medical workers. The Korean Pain Society 2013-04 2013-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3629340/ /pubmed/23614075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.2.142 Text en Copyright © The Korean Pain Society, 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ryu, Jae Sung Baek, Seung Woo Jung, Cheol Hee Cho, Suk Ju Jung, Eu Gene Kim, Hae Kyoung Kim, Jae Hun The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room |
title | The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room |
title_full | The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room |
title_fullStr | The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room |
title_full_unstemmed | The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room |
title_short | The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room |
title_sort | survey about the degree of damage of radiation-protective shields in operation room |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23614075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.2.142 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryujaesung thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT baekseungwoo thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT jungcheolhee thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT chosukju thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT jungeugene thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT kimhaekyoung thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT kimjaehun thesurveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT ryujaesung surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT baekseungwoo surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT jungcheolhee surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT chosukju surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT jungeugene surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT kimhaekyoung surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom AT kimjaehun surveyaboutthedegreeofdamageofradiationprotectiveshieldsinoperationroom |