Cargando…

Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques

Objective: To compare various visualization techniques for the detection of non-solid nodules in low-dose lung cancer screening computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: An enriched sample of 216 male lung cancer screening subjects aged 60.4 ± 6.0 years was used. Two blinded independent readers searc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Th. Scholten, Ernst, Mali, Willem P.Th.M., Prokop, Mathias, van Ginneken, Bram, Glandorf, Ron, van Klaveren, Rob, Oudkerk, Matthijs, de Jong, Pim A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: e-Med 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23598304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0016
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To compare various visualization techniques for the detection of non-solid nodules in low-dose lung cancer screening computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: An enriched sample of 216 male lung cancer screening subjects aged 60.4 ± 6.0 years was used. Two blinded independent readers searched for non-solid nodules on 5-mm multiplanar reconstructions, 1-mm slices and 7-mm maximum intensity projections (trial protocol). The reference standard was a consensus diagnosis of all non-solid nodules reported at least once. Results: Twenty-three individuals (10.6%) had in total 34 non-solid nodules. Interobserver agreement was good (Cohen kappa 0.89–0.95). For both observers, we found no differences between the 3 viewing techniques (P > 0.13). Conclusion: In low-dose lung cancer screening CT scans, we were unable to find a viewing technique superior to that used in the trial by experienced observers who focused on non-solid nodule detection.