Cargando…

Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques

Objective: To compare various visualization techniques for the detection of non-solid nodules in low-dose lung cancer screening computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: An enriched sample of 216 male lung cancer screening subjects aged 60.4 ± 6.0 years was used. Two blinded independent readers searc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Th. Scholten, Ernst, Mali, Willem P.Th.M., Prokop, Mathias, van Ginneken, Bram, Glandorf, Ron, van Klaveren, Rob, Oudkerk, Matthijs, de Jong, Pim A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: e-Med 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23598304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0016
_version_ 1782266635391860736
author Th. Scholten, Ernst
Mali, Willem P.Th.M.
Prokop, Mathias
van Ginneken, Bram
Glandorf, Ron
van Klaveren, Rob
Oudkerk, Matthijs
de Jong, Pim A.
author_facet Th. Scholten, Ernst
Mali, Willem P.Th.M.
Prokop, Mathias
van Ginneken, Bram
Glandorf, Ron
van Klaveren, Rob
Oudkerk, Matthijs
de Jong, Pim A.
author_sort Th. Scholten, Ernst
collection PubMed
description Objective: To compare various visualization techniques for the detection of non-solid nodules in low-dose lung cancer screening computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: An enriched sample of 216 male lung cancer screening subjects aged 60.4 ± 6.0 years was used. Two blinded independent readers searched for non-solid nodules on 5-mm multiplanar reconstructions, 1-mm slices and 7-mm maximum intensity projections (trial protocol). The reference standard was a consensus diagnosis of all non-solid nodules reported at least once. Results: Twenty-three individuals (10.6%) had in total 34 non-solid nodules. Interobserver agreement was good (Cohen kappa 0.89–0.95). For both observers, we found no differences between the 3 viewing techniques (P > 0.13). Conclusion: In low-dose lung cancer screening CT scans, we were unable to find a viewing technique superior to that used in the trial by experienced observers who focused on non-solid nodule detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3629890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher e-Med
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36298902014-06-13 Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques Th. Scholten, Ernst Mali, Willem P.Th.M. Prokop, Mathias van Ginneken, Bram Glandorf, Ron van Klaveren, Rob Oudkerk, Matthijs de Jong, Pim A. Cancer Imaging Original Article Objective: To compare various visualization techniques for the detection of non-solid nodules in low-dose lung cancer screening computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: An enriched sample of 216 male lung cancer screening subjects aged 60.4 ± 6.0 years was used. Two blinded independent readers searched for non-solid nodules on 5-mm multiplanar reconstructions, 1-mm slices and 7-mm maximum intensity projections (trial protocol). The reference standard was a consensus diagnosis of all non-solid nodules reported at least once. Results: Twenty-three individuals (10.6%) had in total 34 non-solid nodules. Interobserver agreement was good (Cohen kappa 0.89–0.95). For both observers, we found no differences between the 3 viewing techniques (P > 0.13). Conclusion: In low-dose lung cancer screening CT scans, we were unable to find a viewing technique superior to that used in the trial by experienced observers who focused on non-solid nodule detection. e-Med 2013-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3629890/ /pubmed/23598304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0016 Text en © 2013 International Cancer Imaging Society
spellingShingle Original Article
Th. Scholten, Ernst
Mali, Willem P.Th.M.
Prokop, Mathias
van Ginneken, Bram
Glandorf, Ron
van Klaveren, Rob
Oudkerk, Matthijs
de Jong, Pim A.
Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques
title Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques
title_full Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques
title_fullStr Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques
title_full_unstemmed Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques
title_short Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques
title_sort non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23598304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0016
work_keys_str_mv AT thscholtenernst nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques
AT maliwillempthm nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques
AT prokopmathias nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques
AT vanginnekenbram nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques
AT glandorfron nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques
AT vanklaverenrob nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques
AT oudkerkmatthijs nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques
AT dejongpima nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques