Cargando…
Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques
Objective: To compare various visualization techniques for the detection of non-solid nodules in low-dose lung cancer screening computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: An enriched sample of 216 male lung cancer screening subjects aged 60.4 ± 6.0 years was used. Two blinded independent readers searc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
e-Med
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23598304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0016 |
_version_ | 1782266635391860736 |
---|---|
author | Th. Scholten, Ernst Mali, Willem P.Th.M. Prokop, Mathias van Ginneken, Bram Glandorf, Ron van Klaveren, Rob Oudkerk, Matthijs de Jong, Pim A. |
author_facet | Th. Scholten, Ernst Mali, Willem P.Th.M. Prokop, Mathias van Ginneken, Bram Glandorf, Ron van Klaveren, Rob Oudkerk, Matthijs de Jong, Pim A. |
author_sort | Th. Scholten, Ernst |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To compare various visualization techniques for the detection of non-solid nodules in low-dose lung cancer screening computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: An enriched sample of 216 male lung cancer screening subjects aged 60.4 ± 6.0 years was used. Two blinded independent readers searched for non-solid nodules on 5-mm multiplanar reconstructions, 1-mm slices and 7-mm maximum intensity projections (trial protocol). The reference standard was a consensus diagnosis of all non-solid nodules reported at least once. Results: Twenty-three individuals (10.6%) had in total 34 non-solid nodules. Interobserver agreement was good (Cohen kappa 0.89–0.95). For both observers, we found no differences between the 3 viewing techniques (P > 0.13). Conclusion: In low-dose lung cancer screening CT scans, we were unable to find a viewing technique superior to that used in the trial by experienced observers who focused on non-solid nodule detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3629890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | e-Med |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36298902014-06-13 Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques Th. Scholten, Ernst Mali, Willem P.Th.M. Prokop, Mathias van Ginneken, Bram Glandorf, Ron van Klaveren, Rob Oudkerk, Matthijs de Jong, Pim A. Cancer Imaging Original Article Objective: To compare various visualization techniques for the detection of non-solid nodules in low-dose lung cancer screening computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: An enriched sample of 216 male lung cancer screening subjects aged 60.4 ± 6.0 years was used. Two blinded independent readers searched for non-solid nodules on 5-mm multiplanar reconstructions, 1-mm slices and 7-mm maximum intensity projections (trial protocol). The reference standard was a consensus diagnosis of all non-solid nodules reported at least once. Results: Twenty-three individuals (10.6%) had in total 34 non-solid nodules. Interobserver agreement was good (Cohen kappa 0.89–0.95). For both observers, we found no differences between the 3 viewing techniques (P > 0.13). Conclusion: In low-dose lung cancer screening CT scans, we were unable to find a viewing technique superior to that used in the trial by experienced observers who focused on non-solid nodule detection. e-Med 2013-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3629890/ /pubmed/23598304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0016 Text en © 2013 International Cancer Imaging Society |
spellingShingle | Original Article Th. Scholten, Ernst Mali, Willem P.Th.M. Prokop, Mathias van Ginneken, Bram Glandorf, Ron van Klaveren, Rob Oudkerk, Matthijs de Jong, Pim A. Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques |
title | Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques |
title_full | Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques |
title_fullStr | Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques |
title_short | Non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques |
title_sort | non-solid lung nodules on low-dose computed tomography: comparison of detection rate between 3 visualization techniques |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23598304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thscholtenernst nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques AT maliwillempthm nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques AT prokopmathias nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques AT vanginnekenbram nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques AT glandorfron nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques AT vanklaverenrob nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques AT oudkerkmatthijs nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques AT dejongpima nonsolidlungnodulesonlowdosecomputedtomographycomparisonofdetectionratebetween3visualizationtechniques |