Cargando…

The influence of perfusion solution on renal graft viability assessment

BACKGROUND: Kidneys from donors after cardiac or circulatory death are exposed to extended periods of both warm ischemia and intra-arterial cooling before organ recovery. Marshall’s hypertonic citrate (HOC) and Bretschneider’s histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) preservation solutions are cheap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Colin H, Wyrley-Birch, Hugh, Vijayanand, Dhakshinarmoorthy, Leea, Anabelle, Carter, Noel M, Haswell, Malcolm, Cunningham, Anne C, Talbot, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23369648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-1440-1-18
_version_ 1782266642178244608
author Wilson, Colin H
Wyrley-Birch, Hugh
Vijayanand, Dhakshinarmoorthy
Leea, Anabelle
Carter, Noel M
Haswell, Malcolm
Cunningham, Anne C
Talbot, David
author_facet Wilson, Colin H
Wyrley-Birch, Hugh
Vijayanand, Dhakshinarmoorthy
Leea, Anabelle
Carter, Noel M
Haswell, Malcolm
Cunningham, Anne C
Talbot, David
author_sort Wilson, Colin H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Kidneys from donors after cardiac or circulatory death are exposed to extended periods of both warm ischemia and intra-arterial cooling before organ recovery. Marshall’s hypertonic citrate (HOC) and Bretschneider’s histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) preservation solutions are cheap, low viscosity preservation solutions used clinically for organ flushing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of these two solutions both on parameters used in clinical practice to assess organ viability prior to transplantation and histological evidence of ischemic injury after reperfusion. METHODS: Rodent kidneys were exposed to post-mortem warm ischemia, extended intra-arterial cooling (IAC) (up to 2 h) with preservation solution and reperfusion with either Krebs-Hensleit or whole blood in a transplant model. Control kidneys were either reperfused directly after retrieval or stored in 0.9% saline. Biochemical, immunological and histological parameters were assessed using glutathione-S-transferase (GST) enzymatic assays, polymerase chain reaction and mitochondrial electron microscopy respectively. Vascular function was assessed by supplementing the Krebs-Hensleit perfusion solution with phenylephrine to stimulate smooth muscle contraction followed by acetylcholine to trigger endothelial dependent relaxation. RESULTS: When compared with kidneys reperfused directly post mortem, 2 h of IAC significantly reduced smooth muscle contractile function, endothelial function and upregulated vascular cellular adhesion molecule type 1 (VCAM-1) independent of the preservation solution. However, GST release, vascular resistance, weight gain and histological mitochondrial injury were dependent on the preservation solution used. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that initial machine perfusion viability tests, including ischemic vascular resistance and GST, are dependent on the perfusion solution used during in situ cooling. HTK-perfused kidneys will be heavier, have higher GST readings and yet reduced mitochondrial ischemic injury when compared with HOC-perfused kidneys. Clinicians should be aware of this when deciding which kidneys to transplant or discard.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3629996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36299962013-04-22 The influence of perfusion solution on renal graft viability assessment Wilson, Colin H Wyrley-Birch, Hugh Vijayanand, Dhakshinarmoorthy Leea, Anabelle Carter, Noel M Haswell, Malcolm Cunningham, Anne C Talbot, David Transplant Res Research BACKGROUND: Kidneys from donors after cardiac or circulatory death are exposed to extended periods of both warm ischemia and intra-arterial cooling before organ recovery. Marshall’s hypertonic citrate (HOC) and Bretschneider’s histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) preservation solutions are cheap, low viscosity preservation solutions used clinically for organ flushing. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of these two solutions both on parameters used in clinical practice to assess organ viability prior to transplantation and histological evidence of ischemic injury after reperfusion. METHODS: Rodent kidneys were exposed to post-mortem warm ischemia, extended intra-arterial cooling (IAC) (up to 2 h) with preservation solution and reperfusion with either Krebs-Hensleit or whole blood in a transplant model. Control kidneys were either reperfused directly after retrieval or stored in 0.9% saline. Biochemical, immunological and histological parameters were assessed using glutathione-S-transferase (GST) enzymatic assays, polymerase chain reaction and mitochondrial electron microscopy respectively. Vascular function was assessed by supplementing the Krebs-Hensleit perfusion solution with phenylephrine to stimulate smooth muscle contraction followed by acetylcholine to trigger endothelial dependent relaxation. RESULTS: When compared with kidneys reperfused directly post mortem, 2 h of IAC significantly reduced smooth muscle contractile function, endothelial function and upregulated vascular cellular adhesion molecule type 1 (VCAM-1) independent of the preservation solution. However, GST release, vascular resistance, weight gain and histological mitochondrial injury were dependent on the preservation solution used. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that initial machine perfusion viability tests, including ischemic vascular resistance and GST, are dependent on the perfusion solution used during in situ cooling. HTK-perfused kidneys will be heavier, have higher GST readings and yet reduced mitochondrial ischemic injury when compared with HOC-perfused kidneys. Clinicians should be aware of this when deciding which kidneys to transplant or discard. BioMed Central 2012-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3629996/ /pubmed/23369648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-1440-1-18 Text en Copyright © 2012 Wilson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Wilson, Colin H
Wyrley-Birch, Hugh
Vijayanand, Dhakshinarmoorthy
Leea, Anabelle
Carter, Noel M
Haswell, Malcolm
Cunningham, Anne C
Talbot, David
The influence of perfusion solution on renal graft viability assessment
title The influence of perfusion solution on renal graft viability assessment
title_full The influence of perfusion solution on renal graft viability assessment
title_fullStr The influence of perfusion solution on renal graft viability assessment
title_full_unstemmed The influence of perfusion solution on renal graft viability assessment
title_short The influence of perfusion solution on renal graft viability assessment
title_sort influence of perfusion solution on renal graft viability assessment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3629996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23369648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-1440-1-18
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsoncolinh theinfluenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT wyrleybirchhugh theinfluenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT vijayananddhakshinarmoorthy theinfluenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT leeaanabelle theinfluenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT carternoelm theinfluenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT haswellmalcolm theinfluenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT cunninghamannec theinfluenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT talbotdavid theinfluenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT wilsoncolinh influenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT wyrleybirchhugh influenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT vijayananddhakshinarmoorthy influenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT leeaanabelle influenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT carternoelm influenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT haswellmalcolm influenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT cunninghamannec influenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment
AT talbotdavid influenceofperfusionsolutiononrenalgraftviabilityassessment