Cargando…

Sex-Differential Selection and the Evolution of X Inactivation Strategies

X inactivation—the transcriptional silencing of one X chromosome copy per female somatic cell—is universal among therian mammals, yet the choice of which X to silence exhibits considerable variation among species. X inactivation strategies can range from strict paternally inherited X inactivation (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Connallon, Tim, Clark, Andrew G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3630082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23637618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003440
_version_ 1782266650864648192
author Connallon, Tim
Clark, Andrew G.
author_facet Connallon, Tim
Clark, Andrew G.
author_sort Connallon, Tim
collection PubMed
description X inactivation—the transcriptional silencing of one X chromosome copy per female somatic cell—is universal among therian mammals, yet the choice of which X to silence exhibits considerable variation among species. X inactivation strategies can range from strict paternally inherited X inactivation (PXI), which renders females haploid for all maternally inherited alleles, to unbiased random X inactivation (RXI), which equalizes expression of maternally and paternally inherited alleles in each female tissue. However, the underlying evolutionary processes that might account for this observed diversity of X inactivation strategies remain unclear. We present a theoretical population genetic analysis of X inactivation evolution and specifically consider how conditions of dominance, linkage, recombination, and sex-differential selection each influence evolutionary trajectories of X inactivation. The results indicate that a single, critical interaction between allelic dominance and sex-differential selection can select for a broad and continuous range of X inactivation strategies, including unequal rates of inactivation between maternally and paternally inherited X chromosomes. RXI is favored over complete PXI as long as alleles deleterious to female fitness are sufficiently recessive, and the criteria for RXI evolution is considerably more restrictive when fitness variation is sexually antagonistic (i.e., alleles deleterious to females are beneficial to males) relative to variation that is deleterious to both sexes. Evolutionary transitions from PXI to RXI also generally increase mean relative female fitness at the expense of decreased male fitness. These results provide a theoretical framework for predicting and interpreting the evolution of chromosome-wide expression of X-linked genes and lead to several useful predictions that could motivate future studies of allele-specific gene expression variation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3630082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36300822013-05-01 Sex-Differential Selection and the Evolution of X Inactivation Strategies Connallon, Tim Clark, Andrew G. PLoS Genet Research Article X inactivation—the transcriptional silencing of one X chromosome copy per female somatic cell—is universal among therian mammals, yet the choice of which X to silence exhibits considerable variation among species. X inactivation strategies can range from strict paternally inherited X inactivation (PXI), which renders females haploid for all maternally inherited alleles, to unbiased random X inactivation (RXI), which equalizes expression of maternally and paternally inherited alleles in each female tissue. However, the underlying evolutionary processes that might account for this observed diversity of X inactivation strategies remain unclear. We present a theoretical population genetic analysis of X inactivation evolution and specifically consider how conditions of dominance, linkage, recombination, and sex-differential selection each influence evolutionary trajectories of X inactivation. The results indicate that a single, critical interaction between allelic dominance and sex-differential selection can select for a broad and continuous range of X inactivation strategies, including unequal rates of inactivation between maternally and paternally inherited X chromosomes. RXI is favored over complete PXI as long as alleles deleterious to female fitness are sufficiently recessive, and the criteria for RXI evolution is considerably more restrictive when fitness variation is sexually antagonistic (i.e., alleles deleterious to females are beneficial to males) relative to variation that is deleterious to both sexes. Evolutionary transitions from PXI to RXI also generally increase mean relative female fitness at the expense of decreased male fitness. These results provide a theoretical framework for predicting and interpreting the evolution of chromosome-wide expression of X-linked genes and lead to several useful predictions that could motivate future studies of allele-specific gene expression variation. Public Library of Science 2013-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3630082/ /pubmed/23637618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003440 Text en © 2013 Connallon and Clark http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Connallon, Tim
Clark, Andrew G.
Sex-Differential Selection and the Evolution of X Inactivation Strategies
title Sex-Differential Selection and the Evolution of X Inactivation Strategies
title_full Sex-Differential Selection and the Evolution of X Inactivation Strategies
title_fullStr Sex-Differential Selection and the Evolution of X Inactivation Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Sex-Differential Selection and the Evolution of X Inactivation Strategies
title_short Sex-Differential Selection and the Evolution of X Inactivation Strategies
title_sort sex-differential selection and the evolution of x inactivation strategies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3630082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23637618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003440
work_keys_str_mv AT connallontim sexdifferentialselectionandtheevolutionofxinactivationstrategies
AT clarkandrewg sexdifferentialselectionandtheevolutionofxinactivationstrategies