Cargando…
Cytotoxic Chromosomal Targeting by CRISPR/Cas Systems Can Reshape Bacterial Genomes and Expel or Remodel Pathogenicity Islands
In prokaryotes, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and their associated (Cas) proteins constitute a defence system against bacteriophages and plasmids. CRISPR/Cas systems acquire short spacer sequences from foreign genetic elements and incorporate these into their CR...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3630108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23637624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003454 |
_version_ | 1782266656856211456 |
---|---|
author | Vercoe, Reuben B. Chang, James T. Dy, Ron L. Taylor, Corinda Gristwood, Tamzin Clulow, James S. Richter, Corinna Przybilski, Rita Pitman, Andrew R. Fineran, Peter C. |
author_facet | Vercoe, Reuben B. Chang, James T. Dy, Ron L. Taylor, Corinda Gristwood, Tamzin Clulow, James S. Richter, Corinna Przybilski, Rita Pitman, Andrew R. Fineran, Peter C. |
author_sort | Vercoe, Reuben B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In prokaryotes, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and their associated (Cas) proteins constitute a defence system against bacteriophages and plasmids. CRISPR/Cas systems acquire short spacer sequences from foreign genetic elements and incorporate these into their CRISPR arrays, generating a memory of past invaders. Defence is provided by short non-coding RNAs that guide Cas proteins to cleave complementary nucleic acids. While most spacers are acquired from phages and plasmids, there are examples of spacers that match genes elsewhere in the host bacterial chromosome. In Pectobacterium atrosepticum the type I-F CRISPR/Cas system has acquired a self-complementary spacer that perfectly matches a protospacer target in a horizontally acquired island (HAI2) involved in plant pathogenicity. Given the paucity of experimental data about CRISPR/Cas–mediated chromosomal targeting, we examined this process by developing a tightly controlled system. Chromosomal targeting was highly toxic via targeting of DNA and resulted in growth inhibition and cellular filamentation. The toxic phenotype was avoided by mutations in the cas operon, the CRISPR repeats, the protospacer target, and protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) beside the target. Indeed, the natural self-targeting spacer was non-toxic due to a single nucleotide mutation adjacent to the target in the PAM sequence. Furthermore, we show that chromosomal targeting can result in large-scale genomic alterations, including the remodelling or deletion of entire pre-existing pathogenicity islands. These features can be engineered for the targeted deletion of large regions of bacterial chromosomes. In conclusion, in DNA–targeting CRISPR/Cas systems, chromosomal interference is deleterious by causing DNA damage and providing a strong selective pressure for genome alterations, which may have consequences for bacterial evolution and pathogenicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3630108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36301082013-05-01 Cytotoxic Chromosomal Targeting by CRISPR/Cas Systems Can Reshape Bacterial Genomes and Expel or Remodel Pathogenicity Islands Vercoe, Reuben B. Chang, James T. Dy, Ron L. Taylor, Corinda Gristwood, Tamzin Clulow, James S. Richter, Corinna Przybilski, Rita Pitman, Andrew R. Fineran, Peter C. PLoS Genet Research Article In prokaryotes, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and their associated (Cas) proteins constitute a defence system against bacteriophages and plasmids. CRISPR/Cas systems acquire short spacer sequences from foreign genetic elements and incorporate these into their CRISPR arrays, generating a memory of past invaders. Defence is provided by short non-coding RNAs that guide Cas proteins to cleave complementary nucleic acids. While most spacers are acquired from phages and plasmids, there are examples of spacers that match genes elsewhere in the host bacterial chromosome. In Pectobacterium atrosepticum the type I-F CRISPR/Cas system has acquired a self-complementary spacer that perfectly matches a protospacer target in a horizontally acquired island (HAI2) involved in plant pathogenicity. Given the paucity of experimental data about CRISPR/Cas–mediated chromosomal targeting, we examined this process by developing a tightly controlled system. Chromosomal targeting was highly toxic via targeting of DNA and resulted in growth inhibition and cellular filamentation. The toxic phenotype was avoided by mutations in the cas operon, the CRISPR repeats, the protospacer target, and protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) beside the target. Indeed, the natural self-targeting spacer was non-toxic due to a single nucleotide mutation adjacent to the target in the PAM sequence. Furthermore, we show that chromosomal targeting can result in large-scale genomic alterations, including the remodelling or deletion of entire pre-existing pathogenicity islands. These features can be engineered for the targeted deletion of large regions of bacterial chromosomes. In conclusion, in DNA–targeting CRISPR/Cas systems, chromosomal interference is deleterious by causing DNA damage and providing a strong selective pressure for genome alterations, which may have consequences for bacterial evolution and pathogenicity. Public Library of Science 2013-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3630108/ /pubmed/23637624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003454 Text en © 2013 Vercoe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vercoe, Reuben B. Chang, James T. Dy, Ron L. Taylor, Corinda Gristwood, Tamzin Clulow, James S. Richter, Corinna Przybilski, Rita Pitman, Andrew R. Fineran, Peter C. Cytotoxic Chromosomal Targeting by CRISPR/Cas Systems Can Reshape Bacterial Genomes and Expel or Remodel Pathogenicity Islands |
title | Cytotoxic Chromosomal Targeting by CRISPR/Cas Systems Can Reshape Bacterial Genomes and Expel or Remodel Pathogenicity Islands |
title_full | Cytotoxic Chromosomal Targeting by CRISPR/Cas Systems Can Reshape Bacterial Genomes and Expel or Remodel Pathogenicity Islands |
title_fullStr | Cytotoxic Chromosomal Targeting by CRISPR/Cas Systems Can Reshape Bacterial Genomes and Expel or Remodel Pathogenicity Islands |
title_full_unstemmed | Cytotoxic Chromosomal Targeting by CRISPR/Cas Systems Can Reshape Bacterial Genomes and Expel or Remodel Pathogenicity Islands |
title_short | Cytotoxic Chromosomal Targeting by CRISPR/Cas Systems Can Reshape Bacterial Genomes and Expel or Remodel Pathogenicity Islands |
title_sort | cytotoxic chromosomal targeting by crispr/cas systems can reshape bacterial genomes and expel or remodel pathogenicity islands |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3630108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23637624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vercoereubenb cytotoxicchromosomaltargetingbycrisprcassystemscanreshapebacterialgenomesandexpelorremodelpathogenicityislands AT changjamest cytotoxicchromosomaltargetingbycrisprcassystemscanreshapebacterialgenomesandexpelorremodelpathogenicityislands AT dyronl cytotoxicchromosomaltargetingbycrisprcassystemscanreshapebacterialgenomesandexpelorremodelpathogenicityislands AT taylorcorinda cytotoxicchromosomaltargetingbycrisprcassystemscanreshapebacterialgenomesandexpelorremodelpathogenicityislands AT gristwoodtamzin cytotoxicchromosomaltargetingbycrisprcassystemscanreshapebacterialgenomesandexpelorremodelpathogenicityislands AT clulowjamess cytotoxicchromosomaltargetingbycrisprcassystemscanreshapebacterialgenomesandexpelorremodelpathogenicityislands AT richtercorinna cytotoxicchromosomaltargetingbycrisprcassystemscanreshapebacterialgenomesandexpelorremodelpathogenicityislands AT przybilskirita cytotoxicchromosomaltargetingbycrisprcassystemscanreshapebacterialgenomesandexpelorremodelpathogenicityislands AT pitmanandrewr cytotoxicchromosomaltargetingbycrisprcassystemscanreshapebacterialgenomesandexpelorremodelpathogenicityislands AT fineranpeterc cytotoxicchromosomaltargetingbycrisprcassystemscanreshapebacterialgenomesandexpelorremodelpathogenicityislands |