Cargando…
Nutrition therapy cost analysis in the US: Pre-mixed multi-chamber bag vs compounded parenteral nutrition
BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSI) occur in up to 350 000 inpatient admissions each year in the US, with BSI rates among patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) varying from 1.3% to 39%. BSI-attributable costs were estimated to approximate $US12000 per episode in 2000. While previous stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21761945 http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/11594980-000000000-00000 |
_version_ | 1782266747648212992 |
---|---|
author | Turpin, Robin S. Canada, Todd Liu, Frank Xiaoqing Mercaldi, Catherine J. Pontes-Arruda, Alessandro Wischmeyer, Paul |
author_facet | Turpin, Robin S. Canada, Todd Liu, Frank Xiaoqing Mercaldi, Catherine J. Pontes-Arruda, Alessandro Wischmeyer, Paul |
author_sort | Turpin, Robin S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSI) occur in up to 350 000 inpatient admissions each year in the US, with BSI rates among patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) varying from 1.3% to 39%. BSI-attributable costs were estimated to approximate $US12000 per episode in 2000. While previous studies have compared the cost of different PN preparation methods, this analysis evaluates both the direct costs of PN and the treatment costs for BSI associated with different PN delivery methods to determine whether compounded or manufactured pre-mixed PN has lower overall costs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare costs in the US associated with compounded PN versus pre-mixed multi-chamber bag (MCB) PN based on underlying infection risk. METHODS: Using claims information from the Premier Perspective™ database, multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of infection. A total of 44 358 hospitalized patients aged ≥18 years who received PN between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2007 were included in the analyses. A total of 3256 patients received MCB PN and 41 102 received compounded PN. The PN-associated costs and length of stay were analysed using multivariate ordinary least squares regression models constructed to measure the impact of infectious events on total hospital costs after controlling for baseline and clinical patient characteristics. RESULTS: There were 7.3 additional hospital days attributable to BSI. After adjustment for baseline variables, the probability of developing a BSI was 30% higher in patients receiving compounded PN than in those receiving MCB PN (16.1% vs 11.3%; odds ratio= 1.56; 95% CI 1.37, 1.79; p<0.0001), demonstrating 2172 potentially avoidable infections. The observed daily mean PN acquisition cost for patients receiving MCB PN was $US164 (including all additives and fees) compared with $US239 for patients receiving compounded PN (all differences p < 0.001). With a mean cost attributable to BSI of $US16 141, the total per-patient savings (including avoided BSI and PN costs) was $US1545. CONCLUSION: In this analysis of real-world PN use, MCB PN is associated with lower costs than compounded PN with regards to both PN acquisition and potential avoidance of BSI. Our base case indicates that $US1545 per PN patient may be saved; even if as few as 50% of PN patients are candidates for standardized pre-mix formulations, a potential savings of $US773 per patient may be realized. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3631121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36311212013-04-25 Nutrition therapy cost analysis in the US: Pre-mixed multi-chamber bag vs compounded parenteral nutrition Turpin, Robin S. Canada, Todd Liu, Frank Xiaoqing Mercaldi, Catherine J. Pontes-Arruda, Alessandro Wischmeyer, Paul Appl Health Econ Health Policy Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSI) occur in up to 350 000 inpatient admissions each year in the US, with BSI rates among patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) varying from 1.3% to 39%. BSI-attributable costs were estimated to approximate $US12000 per episode in 2000. While previous studies have compared the cost of different PN preparation methods, this analysis evaluates both the direct costs of PN and the treatment costs for BSI associated with different PN delivery methods to determine whether compounded or manufactured pre-mixed PN has lower overall costs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare costs in the US associated with compounded PN versus pre-mixed multi-chamber bag (MCB) PN based on underlying infection risk. METHODS: Using claims information from the Premier Perspective™ database, multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of infection. A total of 44 358 hospitalized patients aged ≥18 years who received PN between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2007 were included in the analyses. A total of 3256 patients received MCB PN and 41 102 received compounded PN. The PN-associated costs and length of stay were analysed using multivariate ordinary least squares regression models constructed to measure the impact of infectious events on total hospital costs after controlling for baseline and clinical patient characteristics. RESULTS: There were 7.3 additional hospital days attributable to BSI. After adjustment for baseline variables, the probability of developing a BSI was 30% higher in patients receiving compounded PN than in those receiving MCB PN (16.1% vs 11.3%; odds ratio= 1.56; 95% CI 1.37, 1.79; p<0.0001), demonstrating 2172 potentially avoidable infections. The observed daily mean PN acquisition cost for patients receiving MCB PN was $US164 (including all additives and fees) compared with $US239 for patients receiving compounded PN (all differences p < 0.001). With a mean cost attributable to BSI of $US16 141, the total per-patient savings (including avoided BSI and PN costs) was $US1545. CONCLUSION: In this analysis of real-world PN use, MCB PN is associated with lower costs than compounded PN with regards to both PN acquisition and potential avoidance of BSI. Our base case indicates that $US1545 per PN patient may be saved; even if as few as 50% of PN patients are candidates for standardized pre-mix formulations, a potential savings of $US773 per patient may be realized. Springer International Publishing 2012-08-06 2011-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3631121/ /pubmed/21761945 http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/11594980-000000000-00000 Text en © Adis Data Information BV 2011 |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Turpin, Robin S. Canada, Todd Liu, Frank Xiaoqing Mercaldi, Catherine J. Pontes-Arruda, Alessandro Wischmeyer, Paul Nutrition therapy cost analysis in the US: Pre-mixed multi-chamber bag vs compounded parenteral nutrition |
title | Nutrition therapy cost analysis in the US: Pre-mixed multi-chamber bag vs compounded parenteral nutrition |
title_full | Nutrition therapy cost analysis in the US: Pre-mixed multi-chamber bag vs compounded parenteral nutrition |
title_fullStr | Nutrition therapy cost analysis in the US: Pre-mixed multi-chamber bag vs compounded parenteral nutrition |
title_full_unstemmed | Nutrition therapy cost analysis in the US: Pre-mixed multi-chamber bag vs compounded parenteral nutrition |
title_short | Nutrition therapy cost analysis in the US: Pre-mixed multi-chamber bag vs compounded parenteral nutrition |
title_sort | nutrition therapy cost analysis in the us: pre-mixed multi-chamber bag vs compounded parenteral nutrition |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21761945 http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/11594980-000000000-00000 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turpinrobins nutritiontherapycostanalysisintheuspremixedmultichamberbagvscompoundedparenteralnutrition AT canadatodd nutritiontherapycostanalysisintheuspremixedmultichamberbagvscompoundedparenteralnutrition AT liufrankxiaoqing nutritiontherapycostanalysisintheuspremixedmultichamberbagvscompoundedparenteralnutrition AT mercaldicatherinej nutritiontherapycostanalysisintheuspremixedmultichamberbagvscompoundedparenteralnutrition AT pontesarrudaalessandro nutritiontherapycostanalysisintheuspremixedmultichamberbagvscompoundedparenteralnutrition AT wischmeyerpaul nutritiontherapycostanalysisintheuspremixedmultichamberbagvscompoundedparenteralnutrition |